Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let me ask YOU a simple question!

Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?

have you been drinking? Not only does the above make no sense, but I do not even speak German.

TAM:rolleyes:
 
Dr. Haritt spent a year and a half carefully analyzing the debris and writing the paper.

Has Haritt made his resume/C.V and his professional affiliations known to the public?

What are they?

If he hasn't, he's a fraud.
 
Let me ask YOU a simple question!

Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?



Your exposure as a complete fraud has apparently induced a breakdown. You are the religious fanatic, remember?
 
T....Heiwa has answered your question on the''Heiwa Challenge'' page. I was wondering when you are going to reply ? This could be a highly interesting debate between you.

Speaking of replying to questions, would you mind responding to post 1209?
 
"... highly interesting ..."??

Not a chance.

I know what I'm talking about. It makes the discussion both one-sided and annoying.

Well...actually No.... I see Heiwa giving you an education in structural damage analysis (about which you know nothing btw).

Is the following an example of such an "education"?

Let me ask YOU a simple question!

Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?
 
have you been drinking? Not only does the above make no sense, but I do not even speak German.

TAM:rolleyes:
I thought I had de ja vu until I realized he did this twice.... once here, and the other in response to TK... If that is the apparent standard for AE911truth expertise..... god help them...
 
I thought I had de ja vu until I realized he did this twice.... once here, and the other in response to TK... If that is the apparent standard for AE911truth expertise..... god help them...


His public breakdown is giving me the creeps. Does anyone else feel that way?
 
I was wondering when you are going to reply ?
You're funny!

Alas, not in a humourous way

Thoughtful answer--exactly what we've learned to expect. In the meantime, you remain trapped in 2005. No escape is possible. Events have exposed all of your delusions. Absolutely nothing turned out the way you predicted. You can't learn; you can't adapt; you can't submit your cherished myths to the slightest bit of critical examination. You've been selected for extinction by inexorable evolutionary forces.
This post is a virtual twin to the one in which I used the 'Bullcrap' remark. Therefore I must repeat myself. Bullcrap from start to finish.
If it really is 'bullcrap from start to finish', you will be able to describe at least one thing that has "turned out the way you predicted"

Please, EITHER do so OR accept that your reputation as a self-deluding and willfully-ignorant liar will become further entrenched in the minds of those reading this thread

When are you going to respond to my exceedingly simple challenge?
 
Last edited:
yah that comment came out of nowhere, and was just...insane.

TAM:)

I believe it better translates into the God question.
He is trying to tie in each sides "beliefs", and how we justify them. Then again, who really eff'n knows?

Here is a paper on it.http://www.lsu.edu/artsci/groups/voegelin/EVS/2004 Papers/Hollweck2004.htm
THE GOD-QUESTION. JAN ASSMAN’S THE MOSAIC DISTINCTION AND THE RETURN OF THE REPRESSED IN THE “POST-SECULAR” AGE

BY THOMAS HOLLWECK
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER


“The distinction I am concerned with in this book is the distinction between true and false religion that underlies more specific distinctions such as Jews and Gentiles, Christians and pagans, Muslims and unbelievers..

Once the distinction is made, however, a new type of religion comes into existence, something that must be called a “’counter-religion’ because it rejects and repudiates everything that went before and what is outside itself as ‘paganism
 
Let me ask YOU a simple question!

Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?

So how does a "humble man," such as yourself, bow down to lemons and pizza boxes?
 
The Heiwa Challenge structure must obviously be real! And there is no money involved. Just honour!


You said:
See post #1 above.

BTW I'll pay you $1M if you can produce a structure that can be crushed like that. Suteki desu ne!? Get working!

No money involved? You may or may not be stupid, but you are definitely a liar.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
No I never believed that he would give anyone a million dollars, but it is satisfying to point out a blatant lie.

I think my model is a pretty eye-opening example of how a "one-way crush down" is possible. "Part C crushed Part A! Suck on that!"
 
The Heiwa Challenge structure must obviously be real! And there is no money involved. Just honour!
Honour?

Is that German for 'the impotent, psychotic, delusional vomit-spouting paranoia of a domineering, cowardly megalomaniac with the exceedingly poor judgment typical of one unable to notice contradictions in their own thinking, prone to disposing of obvious objections in an irrational fashion whilst in a sort of dream world in which their own contemptuous ideas, desires and fears are mixed up with no distinction between fact and fancy'?

Or is it 'the hallmark of a half-educated, self-deluding fool with a preference for pseudo-science and a penchant for spinning out theories based on a small, usually very questionable factual foundation, who believes that 'we must distrust the intelligence and the conscience and must place our trust in our bad tempered, weak, scared, aggressive, instincts' who, instead of adjusting his assumptions to reality, tries in vain to adjust reality to his perception of a fantasy world whilst flying into an indignant, uncontrollable rage'?

Ich bin ein bin liner :)
 
I believe it better translates into the God question.
He is trying to tie in each sides "beliefs", and how we justify them. Then again, who really eff'n knows?

Here is a paper on it.http://www.lsu.edu/artsci/groups/voegelin/EVS/2004 Papers/Hollweck2004.htm
THE GOD-QUESTION. JAN ASSMAN’S THE MOSAIC DISTINCTION AND THE RETURN OF THE REPRESSED IN THE “POST-SECULAR” AGE

BY THOMAS HOLLWECK
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER

If you were able to decipher that much out of it, my hat's off to you. To me it looked like a half-drunken, half-insane word salad.

TAM:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom