Who's who in the 911-truth movement?

pagan said:
120+ Professors Question 9/11

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html
Click to expand...


I noticed that the site lists Steven Jones' "Why Indeed" paper as "Journal of 9/11 Studies Peer reviewed paper."

If you want a real treat, go to that page and scroll down to

Bruce R. Henry, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Mathematics and Computer Science, Worcester State College. Former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles, General Electric Co.
Click to expand...


His photo begs the question, "Did something once go terribly, terribly, horribly, awfully wrong with the guidance system of a Polaris or Trident missile, and has that incident been covered up lo, these many years?"
 
Last edited:
MikeW said:
Phil Jayhan, suggested along with Deborah Simon that photos of the plane that hit the South Tower showed it had a "pod" on the underside, that may have fired a missile at the tower immediately before impact. Also gave Dylan Avery some money in April 2005 to help with pressing DVDs of the first edition of Loose Change, although the two have since fallen out and are now feuding.
Click to expand...

A yes, the list did lack a representative of the pod-people. Tnx.

Btw, is he the one behind Letsroll.org or does he just contribute there?



/S
 
Last edited:
Barrie Zwicker, Canadian journalist who was one of the first to raise questions about the response of Bush and NORAD on 9/11. He has produced documentaries on the topic, including The Great Deception and The Great Conspiracy: The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw, which may have influenced UK MP Michael Meacher into speaking out about on 9/11 issues. 2006 saw the release of Zwicker's book Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11, but this was generally a compendium of other researchers work and added little new in itself.
 
Excellent additions, Mike. I'm always impressed by the depth of your knowledge and the clarity of your writing.
 
Daniel Hopsicker, a journalist who suggests the Florida-based pilots were involved in drug-smuggling operations and that there was high-level Government knowledge. Also notable for claiming that Mohamed Atta used cocaine, drank, partied with strippers and more. Hopsicker supports this with interviews from Amanda Keller, someone he says was Atta's Florida girlfriend (although that's sometimes questioned, or even ridiculed, and she now denies it). Hopsicker gave his account in the book Welcome to Terrorland, and publishes more stories on his own site, The Mad Cow Morning News. He's criticised by some 9/11 researchers, though, for avoiding theories like controlled demolition.
 
Last edited:
Tnx a lot Mike. I seem to be out of editing time so I cant make any additions to the first post. However, if more keeps coming, I'll do a sum-up in this thread.

If anyone can help me adding context to those already in the list, the same way as MikeW has, I would greatly appreciate it. Ill add that also to a later post.

Cheers,
S
 
Thanks Gravy! Actually I should have done something like this on 911myths a while ago... Maybe I can host it there when we're done.
 
Does Kevin Ryan deserve a position on that list? He's one of my personal favorites.

Also- it's nice that you have some of their positions listed, but not all of them are on there. I have a hard time keeping the pod-people from the death-ray-from-outer-space people from the CD people from the CNN-makes-cartoons people...

Not that it really matters- they're all debunked with the same evidence...
 
Totovader said:
Does Kevin Ryan deserve a position on that list? He's one of my personal favorites.

Also- it's nice that you have some of their positions listed, but not all of them are on there. I have a hard time keeping the pod-people from the death-ray-from-outer-space people from the CD people from the CNN-makes-cartoons people...

Not that it really matters- they're all debunked with the same evidence...
Click to expand...

Problem is that not a lot of them have locked on a theory or position yet. Steven Jones is pretty easy, so is dr Wood. However Fetzer seem willing to publish anything - and afaik hasn't commited to anything but "Inside job. Of some kind".

Same goes for the Pentacon guy, he has just commited to "It went north of Citgo, thats for sure"...

/S
 
Sofia's full name is reported as Sofia Shafquat, and she apparently posts online as "Monica Smallstorm". She created and narrated the film 9-11 Mysteries Part 1: Demolitions with Brad Waddell. The film was based on a play that she and Brad performed in Los Angeles. Brad appears briefly at the beginning of the movie and Sofia appears briefly at the end.

The film is controversial because it credits Eric Hufschmid, a Holocaust Denier, as introducing "Brad" to 9-11 Denial. In addition, Rick Siegel, maker of 9-11 Eyewitness, has threatened legal action against Sofia for using his footage in what he says is disinformation.

Her website is here. She is also the writer of a novel called The Shadow Man which is described as "Thelma and Louise without the gunfire."
 
Totovader said:
Does Kevin Ryan deserve a position on that list? He's one of my personal favorites.
Click to expand...


He most definately do:


Kevin R. Ryan, an lab director at Environmental Health Laboratories Inc. wrote an open letter to NIST questioning their report. He claimed that his alleged employer Underwriter Laboratories had tested and certified the steel in the Twin Towers. The open letter which was published at Septembereleventh.org led to mr Ryans subsequent termination at EHL. The reason given was that he had expressed his own opinions as though they were the institutional opinions of Underwriter Laboratories. I believe that Ryan is the source for the "No way WTC Steel Could Melt At 2000 F" -claim that later gave path for "Only CD could account for molten steel at WTC".

/S
 
Brainster said:
Sofia's full name is reported as Sofia Shafquat, and she apparently posts online as "Monica Smallstorm". She created and narrated the film 9-11 Mysteries Part 1: Demolitions with Brad Waddell. The film was based on a play that she and Brad performed in Los Angeles. Brad appears briefly at the beginning of the movie and Sofia appears briefly at the end.

The film is controversial because it credits Eric Hufschmid, a Holocaust Denier, as introducing "Brad" to 9-11 Denial. In addition, Rick Siegel, maker of 9-11 Eyewitness, has threatened legal action against Sofia for using his footage in what he says is disinformation.

Her website is here. She is also the writer of a novel called The Shadow Man which is described as "Thelma and Louise without the gunfire."
Click to expand...

Tnx Brainster for that detailed addition, I will correct the Sofia entry. I thought the Tulsatruth homepage was here, simply because it appears in the first frames of her plead for money.

I wonder how that play looked... The enactment of 911 on stage, never thought that could happen.

/S
 
Gravy said:
I noticed that the site lists Steven Jones' "Why Indeed" paper as "Journal of 9/11 Studies Peer reviewed paper."

If you want a real treat, go to that page and scroll down to




His photo begs the question, "Did something once go terribly, terribly, horribly, awfully wrong with the guidance system of a Polaris or Trident missile, and has that incident been covered up lo, these many years?"
Click to expand...

Bruce R. Henry, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Mathematics and Computer Science, Worcester State College. Former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles, General Electric Co.
Click to expand...
Bruce%20Henry2%20220%20JPG80.jpg


He has the look of the Grim Reaper. You better watch it Gravy. He is coming for you. To deliver "the truth".


Hey, maybe you are onto something? Perhaps this guy was responsible for the programming of a Trident missile test in the 70's?

Something went wrong, but luckily the missile disapeared into space and everybody went... phew... and forgot about it.

Then the chick came home to roost and hit the Pentagon on 9/11?


Anyway, I really like credentials of this guy.

  • Article 8/12/06: "The sudden collapse, the seamless downward cascade of the crumbling World Trade Center towers planted doubt in Bruce Henry's mind.

    The way the buildings fell didn't seem right. The implosion-like plummeting, the absence of central beams and girders refusing to fall, the speed of the collapse -- all raised suspicion for the retired mathematics professor from Worcester.

    "That was the seed," said Henry, who taught at Worcester State College. "To me it seems so transparent with a minimal amount of reflection that there's something catawampus," or cockeyed, with the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

    Finally, he came to a shocking conclusion that runs counter to the accepted history of America's darkest day: The towers, he believes, "were brought down by planted explosives." http://www.information
  • Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."
Click to expand...
This is the type of guy we need in the 911 truth movement.
 
Gravy said:
pagan – anonymous internet poster who claims to possess absolute scientific proof that 9/11 was an inside job, but refuses to produce it. Believes everyone who doesn't think like him is a Bush-lover.
Click to expand...

I like this one better:


pagan: also known as the "mighty pagan". The nemesis of the "debunkers". The slayer of the Gravy monster and the bringer of truth.:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom