Who was in on the inside job ?

[cjnewson88]

I love that list by gravy

 

[Belz...]

Everyone, obviously.

 

[Animal]

I love that list by gravy

That list is missing quite a bit.
You would have to add in multiple union locals and their affiliated national groups. Nothing moves in Manhattan without several unions involved. Anyone crazy enough to believe that union reps would turn a blind eye to elevator work, drywall work, electrical work, trucking, etc. etc.without the union seal of approval is crazy enough to believe in ninja arsonist.

 

[HotRodDeluxe]

Everyone, except the truthers of course.

 

[Athyrio]

I heard the bomb sniffing dogs were bribed with Beggin' Strips.

.

 

[Jango]

So far I have heard the following were involved in the "inside Job"

Aviation industry Oil industry NYFDLarry Silverstein
George Bush
The NIST This forum Police departmentDemolition teams
Arsonists
The military Judges The media
What have I missed ?

Re highlighted: am I to read that as *all* people related to those industries were/are in on it?

 

[JSanderO]

Re highlighted: am I to read that as *all* people related to those industries were/are in on it?

Kind of a dumb question... hierarchical organization compartmentalize information on a need to know basis...

That's the way the world works... and the bottom never knows what the top is up to.

 

[ozeco41]

Kind of a dumb question... hierarchical organization compartmentalize information on a need to know basis...

That's the way the world works... and the bottom never knows what the top is up to.

...and vice versa???

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Every living human being with one active functioning brain cell.

 

[JSanderO]

...and vice versa???

well yeah... but the top can demand to know what the guys under them are doing... in fact direct them through the chain of command... but the guys down can't know what the managers are doing or question them.

 

[LSSBB]

well yeah... but the top can demand to know what the guys under them are doing... in fact direct them through the chain of command... but the guys down can't know what the managers are doing or question them.

Sorry JSO, in my opinion this is a somewhat ...cartoonish view. Folks at the top can demand all they want. that doesn't mean those at the bottom may comply. Folks can drag their feet, pocket veto, or sabatoge efforts and will definitely do so if demands are used instead of more effective means of persuasion. Influence in large organizations is not a simple matter. And there are plenty of ways for folks farther down to know what is going on higher up. Grapevines, stuff overheard, organizational clues, leaks at all levels. The monolithic organization is a myth. Governnment or commercial.

I recommend you do some research on Organizational Change Management. "It's All Politics" by Kathleen Reardon is another good read on the subject of influence.

 

[ozeco41]

Sorry JSO, in my opinion this is a somewhat ...cartoonish view. Folks at the top can demand all they want. that doesn't mean those at the bottom may comply. Folks can drag their feet, pocket veto, or sabatoge efforts and will definitely do so if demands are used instead of more effective means of persuasion. Influence in large organizations is not a simple matter. And there are plenty of ways for folks farther down to know what is going on higher up. Grapevines, stuff overheard, organizational clues, leaks at all levels. The monolithic organization is a myth. Governnment or commercial.

I recommend you do some research on Organizational Change Management. "It's All Politics" by Kathleen Reardon is another good read on the subject of influence.

Most of the info the "higher ups" rely on is sourced through the activities/efforts of the "lower downs". The direction setting role of the "higher ups" is more about setting directions - and interpreting information in a broader context rather than actually sourcing the information.

 

[JSanderO]

Sorry JSO, in my opinion this is a somewhat ...cartoonish view. Folks at the top can demand all they want. that doesn't mean those at the bottom may comply. Folks can drag their feet, pocket veto, or sabatoge efforts and will definitely do so if demands are used instead of more effective means of persuasion. Influence in large organizations is not a simple matter. And there are plenty of ways for folks farther down to know what is going on higher up. Grapevines, stuff overheard, organizational clues, leaks at all levels. The monolithic organization is a myth. Governnment or commercial.

I recommend you do some research on Organizational Change Management. "It's All Politics" by Kathleen Reardon is another good read on the subject of influence.

I know about bureaucracies and how they work.. Obviously it's impossible for everyone in them to know what everyone else is doing...

I find it unreasonable that low level folks could engineer a complex conspiracy... and it be completely under the radar. Possible? perhaps... likely? no

 

[carlitos]

Kind of a dumb question... hierarchical organization compartmentalize information on a need to know basis...

That's the way the world works... and the bottom never knows what the top is up to.

I agree; this is completely cartoonish.

 

[slowsmile]

So far I have heard the following were involved in the "inside Job"

Aviation industry
Oil industry
NYFD
Larry Silverstein
George Bush
The NIST
This forum
Police department
Demolition teams
Arsonists
The military
Judges
The media

What have I missed ?

Teh joos.

 

[jaydeehess]

Me, or so I am told.

 

[chrismohr]

Here is my video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iya9P5TRd-0&index=5&list=PLDD5BD81A636031A5
Plus, more theories about this:
Richard Gage says his belief in 9/11 controlled demolition is not a conspiracy theory, but he casts a net of suspicion over hundreds of people and institutions in his video 9/11 Blueprint for Truth. How many people do you think would have to be involved in a conspiracy of this magnitude, and why hasn't anyone run to WikiLeaks or created a blog to deliver smoking-gun inside information?
Do you believe most people just can't face 9/11 Truth? Do you think the truth is the most horrible scenario imaginable? I don't. The truth is just the truth, and the evidence tells me it's not nearly as bad as the nightmare that is "9/11 Truth."
Here's an article that says it would take over 8,000 people to pull this off... http://conspiraciesrnotus.blogspot.com/2007/12/8157-high-ranking-american-british-and.html
And here is a lot more info with links about this conspiracy's size:
http://www.debunking911.com/massivect.htm

 

[Trebuchet]

I plead guilty. As part of the Aviation Industry, I designed some of the flight controls that were NOT used to fly the non-existent airplanes into the building.

 

[Redwood]

The insurers of all destroyed and damaged buildings for not pursuing the obvious signs of demolition.
Larry Silverstein and all the other building owners and developers for the same reason and for making out like bandits.
The History Channel for deleting all evidence they ever did a show where Silverstein admitted to CD.
The Internet (Google, Yahoo...) for assisting in the History Channel's cover-up.
Oystein for being a shill.
Jim Fetzer, Judy Wood, Dmitri Khazelov and all their fans for their active disinfo. (Alternatively: Gage and his 2350 A&E for the same, depending on which CT you favor)

 

[Redwood]

Ace Elevator needs to be added to the list. In fact, I believe they've been directly accused by "truthers".

Don't forget Otis Elevator. Although Ace Elevator had won the Twin Towers contract many years before, Larry Silverstein stuck with Otis with regards to WTC 7 right up until 9/11/2001.