Who actually committed the crime on 9/11?

[LashL]

Bush and Cheney and their accomplices must be tried, convicted and hanged.

You have left out the most important step in the process. It's called evidence.

How about bringing some?

Please be specific as to the allegations that you are making and please be specific as to the evidence that you have in support of your allegations. This is a necessary step before anyone can or should be "tried, convicted and hanged", after all.

...so...what's the latest fiction as to why no Arabic, or even Arabic-sounding, names appeared on any of the sedulously maintained, computerized passenger lists?

Psst. It's 2008. That silly canard that you are regurgitating is way past its best-before date, as it was proven untrue years ago.

It seems apparent that you have a lot of catching up to do.

 

[Wildy]

Bush and Cheney and their accomplices must be tried, convicted and hanged.

What happens if they are tried and not convicted? Does that mean you will still hang them?

 

[gumboot]

What happens if they are tried and not convicted? Does that mean you will still hang them?

iAmerican said they must be convicted.

-Gumboot

 

[Wildy]

So in other words he just wants to see Bush and Cheney hang?

 

[Hans]

I've noted that iAmerica is making it his "method" to make wild statements and when challenged on them; change the subject, abandon the thread or rant about something else.

He appears to be a wordy troll

 

[iAmerican]

Still trying to un-ring the bell, eh? Indict, and impeach on the evidence provided. Treason trial, conviction, full expropriation and execution to follow. Deal with the facts. Millions of Americans and people around the globe watched Larry King that night - with the eyewitness accounts, freely given from workers on Capitol Hill, of the passenger jet swooping up over the Capitol...in the direct line from the Pentagon and its Columbia Pike approach path. Maps of the flight path were published in newspapers the next day, before the "spin" could be put together to deal with those who had yet to conform their "take" on the power elite's lie...like "poor" Jamie McIntyre's laughable efforts.

Your "catch up" is too late for those who wish to confine their perspective to the knowable truth...no "memory hole" available. E.S.&D. if Death for Treason isn't what you require, Tory.

 

[peteweaver]

Clearly this forum entertains a lot of very intelligent folks who think of themselves as scientific critical thinking investigators. Personally, I don't see how anyone can "watch" the video of the WTC Building Number 7 collapse and believe it just fell down so beautifully..all from fatigue?

Since the FBI said they don't have any evidence linking either Osama or Saddam to the crime on 9/11, who do you feel actually did commit this crime?

Of course, when you express your opinion about this you will be labeled a Conspiracy Theorist. To Hell with the critics. Show some backbone and say what you think, even if you're wrong.

Personally, I think Francesco Cossiga was telling the truth, not just being sarcastic, when he said the CIA and MOSSAD ran the operation. I could be wrong. Please share your thoughts on this matter.

No it was the Silurians and the Sea Devils in a combined operation with the Daleks of Skaro, the Cybermen of Mondas, the Sontaran battlefleet, and The Master, a renegade time lord from the Planet Gallifrey, who has a penchant for conspiring.

 

[tomwaits]

Treason trial, conviction, full expropriation and execution to follow.

Edited by chillzero: 

Edited for civility

 

[iAmerican]

Whig Historical Consciousness was good enough for America's Founders...good enough today.

N.B. Thanks "chillzero," however I took it as a kind of compliment. I am not young, have also raised children well, and know many others suffer from cultural factors which compel them to regard those with extraordinarily high intelligence as the now-edited poster expressed. Whig principles are available to all. America's Founders established them. Enough information has been archived that their traces will never be lost. No offense was taken. The poster is welcome to read The Founders' wisdom to recognize that the world view my understanding reflects is fundamental Americanism.

 

[uk_dave]

Still trying to un-ring the bell, eh? Indict, and impeach on the evidence provided. Treason trial, conviction, full expropriation and execution to follow. Deal with the facts. Millions of Americans and people around the globe watched Larry King that night - with the eyewitness accounts, freely given from workers on Capitol Hill, of the passenger jet swooping up over the Capitol...in the direct line from the Pentagon and its Columbia Pike approach path. Maps of the flight path were published in newspapers the next day, before the "spin" could be put together to deal with those who had yet to conform their "take" on the power elite's lie...like "poor" Jamie McIntyre's laughable efforts.

Your "catch up" is too late for those who wish to confine their perspective to the knowable truth...no "memory hole" available. E.S.&D. if Death for Treason isn't what you require, Tory.

You mean the conspirators allowed people to see through the deception and then hurriedly had to cover up the fact because apparently those people went completely against the conspirators predictions and actually spoke about what they'd seen?

Doesn't ever worry you that the conspiracy you fantasize about has to be so obvious to the layperson and yet only special people like you can actually see it?

If it was so obvious why didn't the conspirators do a better job of concealment? Why do they conform so readily to your preconceptions when it is you they are trying to fool in the first place?

Do you ever hold any doubts that your view of the world might just be a bit.......

.............. twisted?

 

[proxywar]

Here is the original story of the quote alleged to have been given by an FBI official:




First, the article doesn't say what you claim it says--there's nothing about "not a shred of evidence."

Second, from of Dale L. Watson, Executive Assistant Director of the FBI's Counterterrorism/Counterintelligence Division, February 6, 2002, before the Senate Intelligence Committee:




This is from the FBI's own web site. So, even assuming for the sake of argument that Tomb was not misquoted or quoted out of context, which statement is more likely to be accurate? The prepared, sworn testimony of a high-ranking FBI official before a Congressional committee, or a presumably off-the-cuff response to an unexpected question?




Bin Laden had already been indicted for the 1998 embassy bombings, and is eligible for the death penalty. What's the point of going to the additional time and trouble to indict him again, especially when he's exceedingly unlikely ever to be captured alive to stand trial?

If that's true then explain why OBL wasn't added to the FBI's most wanted list before for the 1998 embassy bombings. Also has OBL now been added to the list?

 

[iAmerican]

You mean the conspirators allowed people to see through the deception and then hurriedly had to cover up the fact because apparently those people went completely against the conspirators predictions and actually spoke about what they'd seen?

Doesn't ever worry you that the conspiracy you fantasize about has to be so obvious to the layperson and yet only special people like you can actually see it?

If it was so obvious why didn't the conspirators do a better job of concealment? Why do they conform so readily to your preconceptions when it is you they are trying to fool in the first place?

Do you ever hold any doubts that your view of the world might just be a bit.......

.............. twisted?

Tories felt our American world view was "twisted" right up to Yorktown...and beyond. Mox nix. Bush did 9-11...not in a vacuum or without an established faction. Those whose karma and character dictate affiliation therewith shall continue to voice their objections concerning those American patriots resigned to point out the proof of his, his father's, his grandfather's, and his faction's, treason.

Novus Ordo Seclorem: The New Secular Order
Annuit Coeptis

 

[uk_dave]

Tories felt our American world view was "twisted" right up to Yorktown...and beyond. Mox nix. Bush did 9-11...not in a vacuum or without an established faction. Those whose karma and character dictate affiliation therewith shall continue to voice their objections concerning those American patriots resigned to point out the proof of his, his father's, his grandfather's, and his faction's, treason.

Novus Ordo Seclorem: The New Secular Order
Annuit Coeptis

Was that a 'yes'?

 

[iAmerican]

Actually that was a 'no,' Einstein.

 

[proxywar]

It's Novus Ordo Seclorum and it means "New Order of the Ages" not The New Secular Order. Novus Ordo Mundi is latin for new world order. and Annuit Coeptis means "He has approved our undertakings" basically meaning God.

 

[tsig]

The FBI announced that they did not have a single shred of evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to the 9/11 caper, yet many of you are saying he was the mastermind behind it.

Are you mistaken or is the FBI?

The NWO is never mistaken. Skimpy clad young ladies yelling this makes it more true.

 

[tsig]

St. Valentine's Day Massacre was a false flag. EVERYONE knows that.

Except the dead guys.

 

[westprog]

St. Valentine's Day Massacre was a false flag. EVERYONE knows that.

They were "dressed as cops". Yeah, right.

 

[iAmerican]

Dictionaries are fun: Unless you're a Latinizer with "the Agenda"

It's Novus Ordo Seclorum and it means New Order of the Ages not The New Secular Order.

Check a Latin-English Dictionary with some years on it: Novus Ordo Seclorem means "The New Secular Order."

Viz: "The Pocket Oxford Latin Dictionary" - a 1913 reprint.

Learn something new everyday.

Come out of Babylon...or just learn to be a better American.

 

[twinstead]

For God's sake iM PLEASE stop with the irrational ideological diatribes; nobody likes world views shoved down their throats, especially ones that don't conform to reality like yours.