Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

LucyR said:



What groups, organizations, etc., do you consider to be examples of cults?


Why is the cult thing a stopping point. Notice I said cults _and_ _sects_ ?
 
Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

LucyR said:



What groups, organizations, etc., do you consider to be examples of cults?

Does it matter? Once again (for the third time no less) I must point out that I said cults _and_ sects.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

corplinx said:


Does it matter? Once again (for the third time no less) I must point out that I said cults _and_ sects.

Actually, I was asking Whodini, not you. He used the word 'cult'. I used the word 'cult'. Clear?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

LucyR said:


Actually, I was asking Whodini, not you. He used the word 'cult'. I used the word 'cult'. Clear?

Crystal
 
Another good scientology-related site: http://www.xenutv.com

Lots of informative documentaries on the subject up there, as well as tapings of pickets, protests, court hearings, and so on. Also, some humor.

One thing I have to point out: scientologists have a thing for labeling anyone who dares to criticize their organization in any way as being religious bigots. It's their standard defensive-mechanism for just about anything, really. Unfortunately, it's also hypocritical, because by being so utterly intolerent of criticism, the organization has revealed its own manner of bigotry.
 
hammegk said:
Secular-humanistic, Atheistic, communism has by far the highest body count, and holds the potential for similar destructiveness on a world-wide scale. US-UK-Canada-Australia are the core effective force counterbalancing the New World (communist dictatorship) Order the remainder of the world appears to so badly crave.

The cults & sects mentioned so far will never have similar massive destructive capability, imnsho.

Hard to argue with the statement at face value, your refering to our friend Iosef Stalin (can't remember his real name) right? He certainly has an impressive body count, and moa didn't do that bad either (something at straightdope on this, can't remember).

But seriously, us commies are toothless now, I'll have to go with radical islam, all variants, that way I can lump wars in the middle east and acts of terrorism in the score.
 
----
Still defending your $cientology, eh? You suck worse than I ever would have believed possible.
----


Yahzi,

Like I said before, I'm not going to participate in involved debates with you; I just don't like your tone.

Hey another Clambake link... Who would have thought. ;)
 
Xenu Loves you!....well, maybe not..

I'm afraid I'm going to have to state that Scientology appears to be far and away one of the most dangerous cults, beaten only by fundamentalist Islam.

The main difference between Scientolgy and Islam is that one is trying to suck all the money from your wallet(thereby killing you[albeit slowly]), and the other is just trying to kill you.

I was going to post a clambake link but I figured everybody here is probably sick of them by now.


-Hunter
 
I thought the largest danger of scientology is western society was the attempt to get scientologists in high places so that scientology cannot be effectively investigated by authorities.


In other words, by the time they become a real danger its too late to do anything about them.

Of course, this borders on paranoid conspiracy theories.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

corplinx said:



That page is scary. I got a banner ad for a Dr. Weill book. He is a notorious quack.

Religious tolerance...


Doesn't that mean .. " We'll take your money, no matter what you believe in.." ?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

Diogenes said:

Religious tolerance...
Doesn't that mean .. " We'll take your money, no matter what you believe in.." ?


http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_tol.htm

They clearly state their position of what religious tolerance means. But instead of actually reading the page and comprehending its meaning, you may find it easier to continue to make fun.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

corplinx said:

That page is scary. I got a banner ad for a Dr. Weill book. He is a notorious quack.


A "quack" who is more educated about medicine and biology than you will ever be.

But I could be wrong.
 
Corplinx,

----
I thought the largest danger of scientology is western society was the attempt to get scientologists in high places so that scientology cannot be effectively investigated by authorities.
----


Can you give 10 examples?


----
Of course, this borders on paranoid conspiracy theories.
----


Yes, it does. :)
 
Upchurch said:

From what I've read of them, I'd have to agree. Scientology is pure capitalism with little interest in helping its followers.


Upchurch,


What about all of the Scientologists that it did and does help?

Do you remember the misses and forget the hits?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

Whodini said:



http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_tol.htm

They clearly state their position of what religious tolerance means. But instead of actually reading the page and comprehending its meaning, you may find it easier to continue to make fun.

Believe me, I'm not making fun.

I don't have any religious tolerance.

added:

I'll read it later, and try to come up with an honest opinion.
 
Whodini said:



Upchurch,


What about all of the Scientologists that it did and does help?

Do you remember the misses and forget the hits?

I'd say those instances were the result of individuals acting helpful, in spite of scientology teachings. :(

How much of scientology do you believe in? I'm not trying to sound insulting... and i'm sorry if it is.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which Cult or Sect is Most Dangerous?

Whodini said:



A "quack" who is more educated about medicine and biology than you will ever be.

But I could be wrong.


Yes. He may have taken more biology and physiology classes than I did. However, I apparently remember that whole "scientific method" thing.

I probably took a lot more classes in mathematics than him. If I was saying 2+2=5 and he corrected me, then my superior education would not automatically mean he is wrong.
 

Back
Top Bottom