• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Well, this politcal cartoon sure is spot on.

I'm calling it. "Show me where I said that" is going to be the new Bobbing.
 
Venom said:
Poor River, backed into a corner by his own nonsense.
Click to expand...


Yes, so backed into a corner because an actual image from the trial that depicts the trial in one image. WOW, what a concept. But of course, leftist trolls must try to look for something deeper, something to be offended by. Of course.
 
River said:
Yes, so backed into a corner because an actual image from the trial that depicts the trial in one image. WOW, what a concept. But of course, leftist trolls must try to look for something deeper, something to be offended by. Of course.
Click to expand...

Says the guy telling people to "bite him". Yeah, everyone else are the ones getting offended. :thumbsup:
 
plague311 said:
Says the guy telling people to "bite him". Yeah, everyone else are the ones getting offended. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Offended? Hardly. Annoyed at the trolling. Because, real answers are not accepted. We must demand more! Trying to read in your own answer might serve some better.
 
Last edited:
Stacyhs said:
River seems to be taking a page straight out of Kavanaugh's playbook. Classic evasion of a straight forward question.
Click to expand...
This forum does seem to encourage hit-and-run posts. I see it in the Trump threads, the CT forums, and the eternal Israel-Palestine thread. Someone will show up periodically only to dump a link or quote and then run away, refusing to engage in actual discussion.

River posting a photography with no context, only to refuse to tell us what it even shows, much less why they posted it, is just one of countless examples.

It's really strange.
 
Safe-Keeper said:
This forum does seem to encourage hit-and-run posts. I see it in the Trump threads, the CT forums, and the eternal Israel-Palestine thread. Someone will show up periodically only to dump a link or quote and then run away, refusing to engage in actual discussion.

River posting a photography with no context, only to refuse to tell us what it even shows, much less why they posted it, is just one of countless examples.

It's really strange.
Click to expand...

I'll paste the OP for you. No context? Please.

Can you sum up what any logical person is thinking after seeing the hearings on Thursday in one picture?
Click to expand...
 
River said:
Offended? Hardly. Annoyed at the trolling. Because, real answers are not accepted.
Click to expand...

Your answer did. not. answer. the. question. TBD actually gave me a much more rational and clear answer. Imagine that. And it's not trolling to ask you for a clarification.

This whole thing escalated because you were being evasive, not because I wanted to "trap" you in some imagined, if you will, "perjury trap".
 
Belz... said:
Your answer did. not. answer. the. question. TBD actually gave me a much more rational and clear answer. Imagine that. And it's not trolling to ask you for a clarification.

This whole thing escalated because you were being evasive, not because I wanted to "trap" you in some imagined, if you will, "perjury trap".
Click to expand...

Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about with perjury trap. I answered your question a number of times. If you ask again, I'm going to consider you likely insane as if you expect a different answer from the same question and likely ignore. I posted the picture because: it's an actual image from the trial that depicts the trial in one image.
 
Not knowing politicians on sight, I see in that picture a woman with her personal space being invaded by multiple men. What does it depict to you?
 
River said:
Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about with perjury trap.
Click to expand...

It was an attempt at humour. You seem to think that I'm playing some sort of game, like I'm trying to get you to say something so I can play some "gotcha" with you, which is not the case. The perjury trap reference was something Kavanaugh's defenders sometimes bring up, which I thought was appropriate to describe your misconceptions about my intent.

I answered your question a number of times.
Click to expand...

You said that it was in response to the OP. You did not tell me or anyone else in what way it responds to the OP or what the image shows in your view. Maybe you think it's obvious. We don't. It's common courtesy to clarify your meaning when others don't understand it. Maybe we're stupid, but it won't help to clam up and refuse to clarify.

If you ask again, I'm going to consider you likely insane as if you expect a different answer from the same question and likely ignore.
Click to expand...

The only person who made any effort to clarify your position is, ironically, a different poster.

I posted the picture because: it's an actual image from the trial that depicts the trial in one image.
Click to expand...

Any single image from the trial would do the trick as well, which is why I want to know what it is about this specific image that works better than any other. I don't think this is an unfair question to ask. Do you?
 
Belz... said:
It was an attempt at humour. You seem to think that I'm playing some sort of game, like I'm trying to get you to say something so I can play some "gotcha" with you, which is not the case. The perjury trap reference was something Kavanaugh's defenders sometimes bring up, which I thought was appropriate to describe your misconceptions about my intent.



You said that it was in response to the OP. You did not tell me or anyone else in what way it responds to the OP or what the image shows in your view. Maybe you think it's obvious. We don't. It's common courtesy to clarify your meaning when others don't understand it. Maybe we're stupid, but it won't help to clam up and refuse to clarify.



The only person who made any effort to clarify your position is, ironically, a different poster.



Any single image from the trial would do the trick as well, which is why I want to know what it is about this specific image that works better than any other. I don't think this is an unfair question to ask. Do you?
Click to expand...


[SNIP] I seriously did not look that deeply at it. I simply picked an image that looked like one that would depict the hearing in one image. Anything further than that would be made up.
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed to comply with Rule 12 & Rule 0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to use this for a reply to anyone asking why I posted that. SOP.

zzz.jpg
 
River said:
Dude, I have no idea what you're talking about with perjury trap. I answered your question a number of times. If you ask again, I'm going to consider you likely insane as if you expect a different answer from the same question and likely ignore. I posted the picture because: it's an actual image from the trial that depicts the trial in one image.
Click to expand...
I think I get it! The question was: "Can you sum up what any logical person is thinking after seeing the hearings on Thursday in one picture?". Yes, you summed it up with an image of an important scene from the actual hearings, instead of with a cartoon.:thumbsup: (Sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth; that's not my intention.)
 
Last edited:
Hevneren said:
I think I get it! The question was: "Can you sum up what any logical person is thinking after seeing the hearings on Thursday in one picture?". Yes, you summed it up with an image of an important scene from the actual hearings, instead of with a cartoon.:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Indeed! Cheers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom