Well, this politcal cartoon sure is spot on.

[autumn1971]

The sword doesn't fit the liberal narrative.

Hopefully it will soon

 

[Belz...]

No you're not. You've already been answered.

No, the question is about how it answered the OP, specifically. You have not given an answer.

You're waiting for something you can attack and point fingers at.

Stop lying. You have made up this nonsense about me wanting a specific answer, which makes no sense SINCE I HAVE NO IDEA HOW YOU THINK IT ANSWERS THE OP.

 

[Cabbage]

This is probably a lot more accurate.

View attachment 39004

In what way?

 

[River]

No, the question is about how it answered the OP, specifically. You have not given an answer.



Stop lying. You have made up this nonsense about me wanting a specific answer, which makes no sense SINCE I HAVE NO IDEA HOW YOU THINK IT ANSWERS THE OP.

Sorry, I don't deal with crazy or presumptuous frantics.

 

[ServiceSoon]

Can you sum up what any logical person is thinking after seeing the hearings on Thursday in one picture?

This political cartoonist can:

The cartoon depicts a Democrat wearing a shirt with the GOP insignia whom is silencing the historical and now contemporary multicultural standard of presumption of innocence.

 

[Porpoise of Life]

The cartoon depicts a Democrat wearing a shirt with the GOP insignia whom is silencing the historical and now contemporary multicultural standard of presumption of innocence.

This isn't a trial...

 

[Belz...]

Sorry, I don't deal with crazy or presumptuous frantics.

What's crazy about asking you to explain your own words?

You are being spectacularily evasive, so I can only conclude that you know full well that you goofed when posting the picture, and now that you're backed into a corner you refuse to admit it.

 

[TurkeysGhost]

This isn't a trial...

No kidding. Republicans have really had a great success of defining the goalposts on this one. It's a job interview for a highly prestigious, very important position in the government. There's a huge pool of highly qualified candidates, even if you view it through a partisan filter. The standards should be a little higher than "you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt I tried to rape a girl".

it's a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS, we get to be picky. If you're over 6'3", you don't get to be a NASA astronaut. It sucks, but that's the way it is. And if you have been credibly accused of attempted rape and being a drunken, entitled frat-boy, you don't get to be a SC judge. Life's not fair like that sometimes.

 

[sir drinks-a-lot]

I really hope they appoint the serial gang rapist to the Supreme Court soon.

 

[Belz...]

I really hope they appoint the serial gang rapist to the Supreme Court soon.

Don't mince words, Sir, what do you really think?

 

[Scootch]

I really hope they appoint the serial gang rapist to the Supreme Court soon.

Why?

 

[sir drinks-a-lot]

This should be good.

What do you think you see in this picture?

Four white people, half of which are giving the white supremacy sign.

 

[Belz...]

Four white people, half of which are giving the white supremacy sign.

I... I actually don't know what the hell that means.

 

[Stacyhs]

This should be good.

What do you think you see in this picture?

I see a photo that answers the OP question.

No, no no. Answer my question please. What does that picture reveal, in your mind? Don't avoid the question.

I'm not quite sure what you're looking for here. Why don't you tell me what you want me to say instead. I've answered.

I find it odd that you are not sure what I'm asking when I asked it twice. So I'll ask again in all caps:

WHY DID YOU POST THAT PICTURE, AND WHAT DO YOU THINK IT SHOWS?

I'll answer again, not in all caps. I was answering the OP question.



Why don't you tell us what you think it shows, or what you wanted me to say instead? That would be much more salacious.

I don't see how it answers the OP in any way, shape or form, which is why I'm asking you to fill that blank for me. HOW DOES IT ANSWER THE OP?



Why are you under the deluded impression that I'm looking for a specific answer?

Still waiting for your answer, Riv.

No you're not. You've already been answered. You're waiting for something you can attack and point fingers at. Please, help yourself. Go ahead and make up a description that fits for you. That'll be fine with me.

River seems to be taking a page straight out of Kavanaugh's playbook. Classic evasion of a straight forward question.

 

[johnny karate]

The cartoon depicts a Democrat wearing a shirt with the GOP insignia whom is silencing the historical and now contemporary multicultural standard of presumption of innocence.

On average, how many times do you lie during a job interview?

 

[AnonyMoose]

I... I actually don't know what the hell that means.

Neither do I, but I'm sure someone from the US will come along and explain it to us leftist libtard tourists.

 

[Belz...]

I don't get it. Zig and Sir drinks-a-lot usually make sense. But right now it's gobbledygook to me.

 

[AnonyMoose]

So I did some digging around, and found this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OK_(gesture)

In early 2017, media outlets began reporting on the usage of the OK gesture being used as a white supremacist hand gesture, described by Areo Magazine as a "moral panic".[16][17] Later that year the Anti-Defamation League stated that the OK gesture was not a white supremacist hand sign.[18]


Reports of this specific usage of the "OK" sign as a white power symbol traced its origins to a prank on the website 4chan.[19]


The Boston Globe reported that users on 4chan's Politically Incorrect channel were instructed to "flood Twitter and other social media websites...claiming that the OK hand sign is a symbol of white supremacy,” as part of a campaign dubbed "Operation O-KKK."[20]

So I think it's making the "Ok" gesture with your hand where you put your thumb and index finger together like you're sayin "A-Ok"?

Wow, learn something new every day. I had no idea there's actually hand signals for this kind of stuff.

Crazy.

 

[Segnosaur]

Re: the cartoon showing Kavanaugh's daughter praying for the woman her drunk father tried to attack....

That sounds awful.
But it reminds me of how Kavanaugh used his daughter's praying as a shield.
Doesn't make the cartoon ok.

You have to wonder, if Kavanaugh hadn't brought up his daughter in the first place during his testimony, would the cartoonist have drawn this? I rather suspect not.

 

[johnny karate]

I don't get it. Zig and Sir drinks-a-lot usually make sense. But right now it's gobbledygook to me.

It's difficult to be a Trump apologist and sound rational.