• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wall a huge failure

Jim Bowen:
"Many thanks, The Fool. That goes quite a way to explaining the credibility gap between some posts and the facts."

Jim, if you ever find yourself with a little time on your hands...say ten years or so, you could do worse than ask Mycroft about his views on Eretz Israel....I guarantee you`ll find his replies amusing and they will certainly pass the time.

If you want some real entertainment then ask him about "torture"...what it is and what it isn`t etc etc etc...

And as for The Fool and AUP etc, don`t let them say I`m not good to newcomers here, you are gonna have a damn good laugh if you follow my advice ;)
 
demon said:
Jim Bowen:

Jim, if you ever find yourself with a little time on your hands...say ten years or so, you could do worse than ask Mycroft about his views on Eretz Israel....I guarantee you`ll find his replies amusing and they will certainly pass the time.

If you want some real entertainment then ask him about "torture"...what it is and what it isn`t etc etc etc...

And as for The Fool and AUP etc, don`t let them say I`m not good to newcomers here, you are gonna have a damn good laugh if you follow my advice ;)

I have the feeling that you are spot on about getting a good laugh from some of his views, mate:) I have the feeling that there is something of an, ahem, tiny bias, in how he sees things out there. :D

Jim Bowen (sat at work, being paid to surf the web and drink tea, which all things considered isn't that bad a way of spending time)
 
Originally posted by The Fool
Lol.....you doofus, why are you not defending me? Calling my post a "generalisation" denying its a lie?

In part because you go far beyond generalization, but mostly because you made such an issue of Skeptic "misrepresenting" your views. Honestly, if Demon had said exactly what you said, I very likely would either have ignored it entirely or simply stated a correction.

Because you have made such a huge issue of others misrepresenting your views, because you fail to live up to your own standards and do exactly what you’ve complained about so vocally in others, you are especially deserving of contempt.

Do you hold yourself to the same standards you expect of others or not?

Originally posted by The Fool
Anyway....which bit is a lie? You point out which particular bit is a lie and we'll explore your opinion on the matter...or you can run off, your choice.

All of it.

I believe the expectation is that if you make a claim it’s up to you to back it up. Feel free to document any of those assertions of yours, then I will discuss them.

I’ll also point out for the record that the last several times I asked you to document your words it was you who ran off.

A year ago I had some respect for you. While we disagreed on much, I at least thought you were somewhat interested in discussion and were willing to consider other viewpoints. For the past six months or so, it seems as though you’ve abandoned all pretense of debating anything and have become incapable of anything more than ad homonem attacks against anyone that says anything that doesn’t fit within your world view.

What changed? Did you have a stroke? A personal tragedy? What?
 
Mycroft said:
In part because you go far beyond generalization, but mostly because you made such an issue of Skeptic "misrepresenting" your views. Honestly, if Demon had said exactly what you said, I very likely would either have ignored it entirely or simply stated a correction.

Because you have made such a huge issue of others misrepresenting your views, because you fail to live up to your own standards and do exactly what you’ve complained about so vocally in others, you are especially deserving of contempt.

Do you hold yourself to the same standards you expect of others or not?



All of it.

I believe the expectation is that if you make a claim it’s up to you to back it up. Feel free to document any of those assertions of yours, then I will discuss them.


lets take this one at a time then...
1. You reject that Israel has stolen land off palestinians....is that true or a lie? do you really want me to quote all the times you have denied it is/was theft???????
2. You claim the land was either purchased or taken only because Israel was attacked (but not by the owners of the land) is that true or a lie? Do you really want me to quote all the times you have claimed the land was purchased or all the times you claimed it was because Israel was attacked??????
3. You are unable to set a limit to Israeli expansion after many requests...is that true or a lie? Do you really want me to quote all the times you have not answered that one....Hang on, how the hell can I quote what you won't do???? ....you could settle this by just telling us what the ultimate limit to Israels borders should be...(its got to be worth one more try to get an answer)



I have lost patience with you Mycroft. You watch skeptic lie and fabricate and rant racist hate and all you can do is rationalise or applaud it....I also, at one point, held you in higher regard than skeptic and Tony and other racist trash that inhabit this place....but in the end thier apologists are no better.
 
The Fool said:
lets take this one at a time then...
1. You reject that Israel has stolen land off palestinians....is that true or a lie? do you really want me to quote all the times you have denied it is/was theft???????
2. You claim the land was either purchased or taken only because Israel was attacked (but not by the owners of the land) is that true or a lie? Do you really want me to quote all the times you have claimed the land was purchased or all the times you claimed it was because Israel was attacked??????
3. You are unable to set a limit to Israeli expansion after many requests...is that true or a lie? Do you really want me to quote all the times you have not answered that one....Hang on, how the hell can I quote what you won't do???? ....you could settle this by just telling us what the ultimate limit to Israels borders should be...(its got to be worth one more try to get an answer)

Yes and yes to the bolded questions. Perhaps in researching my words in context you might catch their meaning that apparently has eluded you the first several times. I’m losing track, is this the third or fourth time you’ve run away when I asked you to back up similar assertions?

To the third, you can research the three or four times I did answer that question, your assertion that I haven't is an outright lie. I don’t know what it means that you continue to repeat it again and again or have never addressed the answer when I have given it, but I’ve lost patience with this particular lie. If you don’t like my answer, say so. If you disagree, debate it, but if you continue to assert that I haven’t answered it, you’re just lying.

Then you can answer my question about if you believe you should live up to the standards you hold others to. Are you a hypocrite or not? Yes or no. If you get mad when you think Skeptic mischaracterized your words, why is it okay for you to do it?

Originally posted by The Fool
I have lost patience with you Mycroft. You watch skeptic lie and fabricate and rant racist hate and all you can do is rationalise or applaud it....I also, at one point, held you in higher regard than skeptic and Tony and other racist trash that inhabit this place....but in the end thier apologists are no better.

Whatever. I remember your deplorable behavior in Renata’s Talmud thread. Work your crusade to find racism in everyone who disagrees with you. Not only will it save you the effort of thinking, it might distract you from what you see in the mirror.
 
The Fool said:
ignorance.

The ignorance here is claiming anyone said Arab land owners didn't have title to their lands. Nobody said that.

Of course, recognizing that might force you to put your two brain cells to work figuring out what was said, so it's best to just call everyone who disagrees with you a racist so you don't have to think about it anymore.

Good-night.
 
Mycroft said:
The ignorance here is claiming anyone said Arab land owners didn't have title to their lands. Nobody said that.

Of course, recognizing that might force you to put your two brain cells to work figuring out what was said, so it's best to just call everyone who disagrees with you a racist so you don't have to think about it anymore.

Good-night.
Congratulations Mycroft, you appear to be the only one here fanatical enough to be an apologist for Tony.

tony says..
"Yep. The sooner the palestinian sh!t stain is wiped off the earth, the better."
Mycroft thinks the author of this hate rant is....... ?? the word starts with R...any guesses??
 
Mycroft said:
Yes and yes to the bolded questions. Perhaps in researching my words in context you might catch their meaning that apparently has eluded you the first several times. I’m losing track, is this the third or fourth time you’ve run away when I asked you to back up similar assertions?

out of contect...Lol, ok 1 point to you, I had overlooked your ability to use the out of context excuse....Can I ask if it is not too much trouble for you to type the words yes or no? Or would that be too much? Do you deny that Israel has stolen Palestinian land? You said I lied by claiming you deny this....you can clear this up right now with 2 or three keystrokes, how about it big fella?


To the third, you can research the three or four times I did answer that question, your assertion that I haven't is an outright lie. I don’t know what it means that you continue to repeat it again and again or have never addressed the answer when I have given it, but I’ve lost patience with this particular lie. If you don’t like my answer, say so. If you disagree, debate it, but if you continue to assert that I haven’t answered it, you’re just lying.

Was that the change of topic answer? you crack me up Mycroft. but anyway, you can clear this up by linking to just one of your "answers". There has been more confirmed sightings of Elvis than any answer from you on that topic...



Then you can answer my question about if you believe you should live up to the standards you hold others to. Are you a hypocrite or not? Yes or no. If you get mad when you think Skeptic mischaracterized your words, why is it okay for you to do it?

this is like pulling teeth....you claim I lied about your position yet you will not give a yes or no as to if it is your position or not.... gimme a break, I'm trying as hard as I can but I can't force you to type yes or no.



Whatever. I remember your deplorable behavior in Renata’s Talmud thread. Work your crusade to find racism in everyone who disagrees with you. Not only will it save you the effort of thinking, it might distract you from what you see in the mirror.

My "deplorable" behavior was to apply the same standards to Talmudic writings as Skeptic was applying to christian writings. strangely, you don't find refering to palestinians as backward bloodthirsty savages deplorable....what delightful double standards. ....but what the hell would you care, if Skeptic says jump all you want to know is how high.


anyway, new leaf time, I am sick and tired of digging over the same ground with bigots and thier apologists....you can go back to your daily wacky muslim says something silly thread....hope you have fun...they certainly keep Tony amused..
 
Originally posted by The Fool
Congratulations Mycroft, you appear to be the only one here fanatical enough to be an apologist for Tony.

tony says..
"Yep. The sooner the palestinian sh!t stain is wiped off the earth, the better."
Mycroft thinks the author of this hate rant is....... ?? the word starts with R...any guesses??

You change the topic. We were discussing your support of AUP's idiotic statement that anyone had claimed that Arab land owners did not hold title to their land. I addressed only that specific issue, that you take it as a defense of Tony's extreme and racist statement is only another example of your dishonesty.

I'll address the rest of your idiocy later when I have time.
 
a_unique_person said:
What makes you think they didn't have title deeds to their land?

I never made a claim either way.
 
The Fool said:
I tell you that that you read about muslim extremists then you com to the conclusion that extremism is rampant among extremists.... to support this you link to someones musim bashing forum???

Yep, I expected an ad hom attack in place of a valid rebuttal.

Please tell me the evidence you have that Extremism is the status quo among australian Muslims...

I never made that claim, but since we're touching the subject of muslims in austrailia. Why don't you provide evidence for your claim that: "Muslim Community in Australia containing some extremists....no more or less than any other ethnic/religious grouping.".

If you can do that I'll give you my evidence for stupidity being the status quo among texans...deal?

So wait. You have "evidence" that stupidity is the status quo for people of color and mexicans? You must be hanging out at StormFront again, if not, I'm sure those guys would love to see it.
 
The Fool said:
anyway, new leaf time, I am sick and tired of digging over the same ground with bigots and thier apologists...

If that's really the case, you must have severe self hate issues.

you can go back to your daily wacky muslim says something silly thread....hope you have fun...they certainly keep Tony amused.

Amused? No. More like disgust. But it is my duty as a human to oppose and condemn hateful ideologies and religions, so I'll keep opposing and speaking against Islam and Nazism (your two favorite ideals).
 
The Fool said:
anyway, new leaf time, I am sick and tired of digging over the same ground with bigots and thier apologists....you can go back to your daily wacky muslim says something silly thread....hope you have fun...they certainly keep Tony amused..

blah...blah...blah....

don't you still have a naked lap around the WhiteHouse to perform.....a doughnut to ship somewhere????

DO IT FOOL :p

-z
 
The fool has never been to Israel, nor has Demon or a_u_p. I feel that makes them eminently qualified as arm-chair critics but not knowledgable regarding Israeli security issues.

Perhaps their perspective would be different if they lived under constant threat of death by suicide bomber - for ten years now. I dunno. I am sure they will twist the morality and blame something else for people who knowingly and with premeditation suicide bomb innocent civilians.

The fence was built because enough was enough and something had to be done to stop the suicide bombers who didn't care if it was a pizzeria full of familes or a bus full of high school students or a university cafeteria full of people having lunch. Arab, jew, Russian, American...it doesn't matter. If you are in the wrong place at the wrong time too bad. You are dead because some guy or girl disguised themselves, strapped on a bomb vest and got on the bus. Sorry but no society should have to live like that and there is no moral equivalence to justify such an act.

Here's an interesting article and only supports my contention that Arafat is the stumbling block in this entire mess.

Nobody spent more time with Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat during the years of the Oslo peace process than I did. Why didn't I see that he was incapable of ending the conflict with Israel?

Throughout the Oslo process I repeatedly asked myself if Arafat was a real partner. There always were reasons to question his credibility. Initially, he would try to deny Palestinian responsibility for terrorist attacks in Israel, even when groups like Hamas were claiming credit for those acts. To accept responsibility meant Arafat would have had to take action against Hamas or Islamic Jihad -- and he sought, he said, to divide them rather than confront them.

None of us ultimately understood that the "cause" defined Arafat; he could not live without it and the struggle that it embodied.
 
originally posted by Tony
Genocide and persecution of minorities (especially jews) are holy pursuits in islam. They are bound by their love of allah to kill, and oppress the infidel.


Quack alert.

Extremist Islamophobia.
 
originally posted by Tony
Real quack alert. PC idiot with head in sand.

Au contraire. I am not hiding my head in the sand. In fact I am more than happy to call you an sectarian Islamophobe to your face based squarely on the evidence of your own words.
 
E.J.Armstrong said:
I am not hiding my head in the sand.

That's all you do. You ignore the facts and prefer to argue from ignorance.

In fact I am more than happy to call you an sectarian Islamophobe to your face based squarely on the evidence of your own words.

Is that right before you strap on a bomb and kill some infidels? I'd be more than happy to call you a muslim to your face based on your attitude.
 

Back
Top Bottom