Furcifer
Guest
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 13,797
I had shared those things privately, and not publicly, because they are private matters.You're equivocating. Why did you say it was embarrassing, even though you'd posted about it on the internet and spoken about it in public, and you continue to speak about it today?
It certainly is woo, but I certainly do believe in those things, because what they are is my identity and my religion*, neither of which need to be proven by science. And I do not like talking about these private matters here in a public Forum. The meaning of being a Star Person is not to be special, it is just that it fits so well with my experiences, personality, feelings, and background. As for Breatharianism, it also has got nothing to do with feeling special relative to others. It is an entirely private and personal experience, just like prayer.Admit it. It's woo, and unsupported by Science, and you don't really believe those things, but you like to talk about them because they make you feel special.
How interesting that you would be so wrong, since I am not lying to anyone. Just because I am not like you does not make me a liar. I am being very honest to myself by being a Star Person and by having interest in Breatharianism.I haven't had many dealings with you, but it seems you are a liar to yourself, if not to others.
I had shared those things privately, and not publicly, because they are private matters.
It certainly is woo, but I certainly do believe in those things, because what they are is my identity and my religion*, neither of which need to be proven by science. And I do not like talking about these private matters here in a public Forum. The meaning of being a Star Person is not to be special, it is just that it fits so well with my experiences, personality, feelings, and background. As for Breatharianism, it also has got nothing to do with feeling special relative to others. It is an entirely private and personal experience, just like prayer.
How interesting that you would be so wrong, since I am not lying to anyone. Just because I am not like you does not make me a liar. I am being very honest to myself by being a Star Person and by having interest in Breatharianism.
*But I am also a Lutheran Christian.
So that's how you avoid the comment. So if I say you are trying to be who Lancaster is? Now how do you respond?RSL is a who not a what.
Me manipulative? Here is an example of just how manipulative you can be. And all this just for you to try to find out what the date of my IIG demonstration would be, when the reason I couldn't tell you was that the IIG had asked me to not tell anyone.After our first private chat I publicly posted that I found you manipulative and flirtatious. I have simply been prudent.
How sad. You're the one who can't stop talking about how fat I am while I am finally taking the IIG test that you said I would never take. And you're the one who tells me you're drinking and because your wife is leaving you because you had asked me for topless pictures, all a lie just to find out when my test is. I do not do things like that to you or to anyone. The only reason I ever called you was when I was upset about being called a racist all because I had said that my perceptions of black people are that they are healthier and because racism makes me very upset.I keep records of everything by saving the contents or publicly posting things like when you repeatedly harassed me by phone or continued to send me IMs after I told you not to contact me directly unless through an attorney. When anything happens that I think you could manipulate later, I let others know. That way if you make any attempt to twist things around (which you have done), I will have a record of what was actually said at the time. Thus, if there is any dispute, the tiebreaker is that if *I* was the one lying, then it must be that I set up the lie months in advance in order to use it to refute what *you* claim.
What ever Jim Carr.It's not a threat. It was solid advice. You publicly accused Bookitty of something that she did not do. I have evidence that it is not her. I'm simply doing you a favor. It's not like *I* could do anything to stop you from saying whatever you want.
Well as a matter of fact I know exactly what that is about. And I had nothing to do with it. You can ask him about that. You'll be surprised that it's not what you think.The Starseed84 person who posted the videos was fawning all over you (Google Starseed84 and look at the cached version). For some reason those videos have just been removed. Do you know anything about that?
I know it's through Facebook. I don't see how it could be anything else. And I did not seek publicity, I just wanted to discuss my paranormal claim of medical perception, not to have my whole private life trashed.First, you claimed that I "spied" on your account. Not true. Then you claimed that Bookitty clued me in. Again, that's not true. Why are you assuming that anybody told me about it in the first place? It could be any of your FB friends or friends of friends. You sought publicity, and now you have it. Such is the price of infamy. Or maybe I am just a diligent researcher.
Well, because you are going through great lengths in prying into my personal life.How is the manner in which I came to know public information you posted on the web relevant to anything we're discussing here?
Well then you don't mind if I post some pictures I have of you that I have found on the web do you? I would consider them private if I were you.You have a tenuous grasp on reality. The web is not private.
I do not selectively represent data. Sorry but you must be in your diagnose land where things seem the way you want them to be.Well, YOU claim to be a skeptic and you selectively represent your data...
An undergraduate student should know to keep their best ideas to themselves until they have their Ph.D. I will begin my research work in a few years from now, and if they lead to any new and useful discoveries we'll just have to see about that.If you have great knowledge of physics which we humans haven't discovered yet, why not send it to a peer reviewed physics journal and tell the world about it?
Of course you'll need convincing evidence but if you say this is "real" knowledge than you can surely come up with verifiable tests to prove it in the laboratory for example.
You can shut us up if you come up with even one peer reviewed article about this physics knowledge you speak of.
Sorry. I don't crave attention. I'm just defending myself when you lie about me, in case someone ever reads this.again, I have to ask, why do you people insist on giving this person the attention she obviously craves?
OK, no explanation of breatharianism from VFF, so I Googled it.
Wiki came up, and low and behold Jasmuheen.
Doppelganger? What the heck is going on here? What's with all the blonde woo from Scandinavia? Food From Air, Vision From Feeling...what's next?
Well then you don't mind if I post some pictures I have of you that I have found on the web do you? I would consider them private if I were you.

Oh really? After desertgal is mocking me for having had a heart condition? I was just defending myself.This shows that you are being mean and lashing out at anyone you can.
desertgal kindly mocked me for having had a heart condition. I then like to illustrate what that is like.Desertgal kindly posted about her experiences to try and help you. Since she has sense, she posted only what she was comfortable putting on the internet for anyone to have permanent access to. She didn't post her full name, location, college, major, pictures, videos, career aspirations, boyfriends, etc.
I think it is more mean to mock someone for having had a heart condition.I think it is very mean, and also useless to try to attack her for this.
I did.No, you didn't.
Quite a read. Her devoted disciple dies of starvation and it is her(the disciple's) fault because she lacked faith.
I have not said that none of them agreed with me. Besides I do not share most of my ideas. I will do my work on my own once I am at least a graduate student.You mentioned sharing this with your Professors, and you said none of them agreed with you. If they thought there was any validity in your ideas, they would have rushed to test your hypotheses, then co-authored a paper with you, since what you say would overturn all of modern physics.
That is with respect to my paranormal investigation. Those fellow students do not even know about my physics research hypotheses. And I would certainly not involve any of them in my physics research. They can come up with their own research ideas.Some fellow UNC Charlotte students have written that no other students or graduate students there think your view of physics is correct. Surely, if one of them would work with you and confirm your views with a test, it would mean instant success in academia for both of you.
That is because I am careful not to share my best ideas. You'll just have to see a few years from now if anything comes of my ideas.Can you get one fellow undergrad, graduate student, college professor, or internet science blogger, or even someone from this forum to agree with your writings about physics, and post an affadavid here? No you can't. So don't say scientists agree with you.
Can I name one person with scientific knowledge with whom I have shared my ideas? No.Can you name one person with scientific knowledge who agrees with you? No.
What? This does not apply to what I am doing. Physics is not based on thoughts, physics is based on research hypotheses that are researched and then either validated or dismissed, and once validated the supporting evidence is such that all scientists can agree to it and their personal opinions do not change its validity one way or another.Profesional orchestra musicians think my thoughts on 16th century lute music is groundbreaking and amazing!!! So anyone who disagrees with me is a hater!
Why thank you. This must be the kindest and most respectful post in the past few thousand posts made here by everyone. I of course have no eating disorder, and I am not trying to lose weight.I have been thinking about , and I wanted to apologize for talking about eating disorders with regard to VFF. I only meant if someone I knew, especially a high achieving young woman became a Breatharian, I would worry it was a cover for an eating disorder. It was wrong of me to write specifically about her with regard to this subject. Obviously these are serious dangerous psychological disorders, and I apologize if I offended anyone.
Oh really? After desertgal is mocking me for having had a heart condition? I was just defending myself.
desertgal kindly mocked me for having had a heart condition. I then like to illustrate what that is like.
I think it is more mean to mock someone for having had a heart condition.
I do not have an eating disorder, if I did, I would humbly admit that on behalf of everyone who suffers from the condition. I am also not a perfectionist simply because I find my college courses very easy and have easy to make good grades. For instance as a little girl I learned to read in one day whereas the other kids struggled to learn it for months, and I always finished my workbooks ahead of everyone else and was about a year ahead in third grade. Not because I was a perfectionist or tried really hard, but because it came quick and easy for me. You do not need to insult me for being that way, it is almost as hurtful as someone who does struggle with courses and is called dumb. Just let everyone have their own level of academic capabilities and do not turn it into insults.as someone who has had eating disorders close by I would first like to note that I see no reason to be offended by what you wrote - but someone who was affected themselves may feel differently, I don't know. More than one person that I love have fought eating disorders, but not myself so I can only speak from "co-dependent" viewpoint.
I know that the narrative of eating disorders often includes perfectionism, but as it has become more diagnosed the perfectionism angle has lost ground. The only "active" eating disordered person I have around me now is a man in his fourties - not an insecure attention starved young woman/girl.
Eating disorders seem to be a little more complicated than previously perceived, and a Swedish researcher into the illnes recently was quoted saying a bit dejectedly: (paraphrased) "Really, all we can say with certainty about anorexia today is that a person at some point stops eating, and then is unable to start again without feeling deep agony."
I have, however, come across people who "play" at anorexia for attention and this kind of person would typically not try to hide their eating habits like an anorexic would (like posting with their real name on pro-ana sites etc) and they always take the perfectionist narrative to heart. Basically, telling them that being perfectionist and starving yourself goes together feeds their ego. Typically - they will then use the fact that they starve themselves as signs of their perfectionism, and therefore do not have to excel in anything. They would also typically downplay the fact they were far from perfectionists and conveniently forget things like their inability to keep their room tidy or their gradepoint average up without omitting grades they didn't think counted for contrived reasons.
This is not signs of an eating disorder. At least not the eating part.
It is not a personal attack. I say it to illustrate how silly it is of you to mock me for having had a heart condition. So I do the same with your diagnose, just so you can all see how ridiculous it is to mock someone for having a health condition. Since you are obviously appalled by what it looks like when someone mocks someone for having a health condition, take another look at what you did here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5450634&postcount=48Thanks, Ness. Anita's attempt at using this for a personal attack doesn't bother me, though, so no worries.
I just wish she'd explain how it relates to her squawking that stuff she posted on the Internet should be considered private.
(Boyfriends...hee hee. After 30+ years of marriage, if I had boyfriends, I would definitely be posting that on the Internet. I'd even grab passing strangers to let them know.)
I do not selectively represent data.
It is not a personal attack. I say it to illustrate how silly it is of you to mock me for having had a heart condition. So I do the same with your diagnose, just so you can all see how ridiculous it is to mock someone for having a health condition. Since you are obviously appalled by what it looks like when someone mocks someone for having a health condition, take another look at what you did here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5450634&postcount=48
I think the only thing I've shared about my boyfriend is that he is 42 years older than me, to explain why many years ago I said that I felt like I was 300 years old.
Oh really? After desertgal is mocking me for having had a heart condition?
desertgal kindly mocked me
No, I didn't, since you never had a heart condition.for having had a heart condition. I then like to illustrate what that is like.
But you never had a heart condition, so your point is moot.I think it is more mean to mock someone for having had a heart condition.