• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

photos etc.

911myths must be down. But if you won't be swayed by more evidence, I guess there is no point.

Humans have 5 senses. At least four of them recorded this event, which was real and not faked.

  • Sight - Thousands of people saw the planes. Some took pictures and even video.
  • Hearing - Thousands of people heard the planes. Some broadcast the sound on phone calls and even video soundtracks.
  • Touch - The planes impacted the buildings, felt by thousands in the WTC towers. This was confirmed by seismography.
  • Smell - Thousands of people smelled the jet fuel. Some were even physically burned by it.

Seriously, print this page out and bring it to a mental health professional. What could it hurt?
 
Anders Lindman said:
It would be cool to have some of the 911 truthers start looking into the no plane theories more. Most of them have much more experience researching the 9/11 attack than me. I have only focused on some particular parts plus tried to come up with a hypothesis about the big picture (that the U.S. government was innocent and that the inside job was carried out by a much smaller group of people within some shadowy powers that span internationally).
Click to expand...

So a shadowy group whose name you do not know carried out 911 in ways you don't understand for reasons you can't say.

Well I guess you've covered every question.:rolleyes:
 
Anders Lindman said:
No, it's from a live news broadcast. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fNloyNL88w
Click to expand...

It is from a live news broadcast that used FLIGHT TRACKER. It was using the last updated info and extrapolated where the flight should have been as of the last update. I don't think the FAA was to concerned about updating a program whose sole purpose is convenience of travelers. They were kind of busy at that point.

The page has contact info, ask them your questions and get information from what is called a primary source.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Yes, I looked at some of those. Now the links to those images are broken for me. :confused: But yes, the planes have been photoshopped in I believe.
Click to expand...

Anders, how did your alleged video fakery generate the huge (and unusual) roar of the low-flying jets heard by millions as the jets flew the length of Manhattan island?
 
Macgyver1968 said:
Huh? So there was no one...not one single person, in all of Manhattan...a city of over 1.6 million people...the most densely populated city in the US...that bothered to step outside, or look out a window on the morning of 9/11? Even though the tallest building in the city was on fire? Damn...them New Yorkers are some seriously apathetic S.O.B.'s! :)

You do realize the chance of that happening is about the same chance of me winning the lottery and being struck by two separate lightning bolts, while having group sex with the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders?
Click to expand...

Only a handful of people saw the actual fireball explosion. The vast majority of people watched it happen on television. I remember a video showing people on the street in New York City watching an outdoor huge screen television! And it would not have been easy to spot the plane for someone in Manhattan I guess. Further away, the plane would have been much easier to see, but then why aren't there more amateur videos of the plane?
 
Wolrab said:
It is from a live news broadcast that used FLIGHT TRACKER. It was using the last updated info and extrapolated where the flight should have been as of the last update. I don't think the FAA was to concerned about updating a program whose sole purpose is convenience of travelers. They were kind of busy at that point.

The page has contact info, ask them your questions and get information from what is called a primary source.
Click to expand...

Watch from about 3:00: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fNloyNL88w They are talking about radar tracking.
 
sabretooth47 said:
[qimg]http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n101/sabretooth47/ForumPics/1181968173830.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Wow! That's an evil animal. It's got long ears to hear wickedness and laser beams shooting out of it's eyes and it's eating human remains right in front of us.
 
BigAl said:
You've been lied to by people that use the word,
"truth" much too much. And, being gullible, you believe it.
Click to expand...

Listen to the commentator later on when he says: "...in the FAA system, just a handful, in the skies, over the north-east, right now."
 
BigAl said:
But you claim there were no planes.

Which is it? :jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

No planes that hit the WTC towers that is. Listen to the commentator in the beginning of the video, he talks about both planes already having hit the towers. Computer graphics planes. [my comment] So the time for the tracking of Flight 175 shown is at a later moment in time than the supposed crash, and Flight 175 is still flying high up in the air: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fNloyNL88w
 
Wolrab said:
It is from a live news broadcast that used FLIGHT TRACKER.
Click to expand...
FlightExplorer

It was using the last updated info and extrapolated where the flight should have been as of the last update.
Click to expand...
No. FlightExplorer does not use extrapolated positional data. A more probable explanation is a manually keyed ghost track, but there's no definitive details.

This thread is more instructive...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=177005&highlight=flightexplorer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom