• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

Which has nothing to do with what the million people that were eyewitnesses to some aspect of 9/11 and the forensic and engineering research that shows that aircraft collisions caused all the death and destruction on 9/11.

But aren't the people who were direct eyewitnesses far fewer than a million? And compare that to the 300 million U.S. citizens plus the billions of people around the world.
 
Once again, the first newscast video is of a program called FLIGHT TRACKER. It is a program that shows where flights are SUPPOSED to be as of the last info sent from the FAA. Here it is in action right now:
http://www.flightstats.com/go/Airpo...hn+F.+Kennedy+Intl,+New+York,+NY,+US&x=29&y=0

There is a contact page if you wish to find out information. It will save you the effort of pulling it out your backside.

No, it's from a live news broadcast. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fNloyNL88w
 
All that is a part of the immense cover-up. The cover-up HAD to be done in order for mainstream media and politics to remain functioning.

Ah, so this is another part of the plan that the control freaks decided to leave to chance, is it? They based the entire plan on the belief that the government and media would cover up for them, rather than simply try, convict and sentence them, and they relied on millions of people believing what they'd seen on TV over the evidence of their own eyes?

They seem to have been remarkably bad at being control freaks.

Dave
 
Bunnies did it. Prove me wrong!

1181968173830.gif
 
Ah, so this is another part of the plan that the control freaks decided to leave to chance, is it? They based the entire plan on the belief that the government and media would cover up for them, rather than simply try, convict and sentence them, and they relied on millions of people believing what they'd seen on TV over the evidence of their own eyes?

They seem to have been remarkably bad at being control freaks.

Dave

No, since they HAD to do it, it was no chance involved.
 
No, since they HAD to do it, it was no chance involved.

Since the government HAD to cover up the conspiracy despite not being guilty of it in any way? Or since the eyewitnesses HAD to believe what they saw on television and disbelieve what they saw with their own eyes?

The only reason it HAD to work out that way is for your fantasies to appear plausible. Real life doesn't obey the laws of narrative causality.

Dave
 
Since the government HAD to cover up the conspiracy despite not being guilty of it in any way? Or since the eyewitnesses HAD to believe what they saw on television and disbelieve what they saw with their own eyes?

The only reason it HAD to work out that way is for your fantasies to appear plausible. Real life doesn't obey the laws of narrative causality.

Dave

I think the cover-up had to be made. And that the shadow power group knew that and took advantage of it.
 
Reminds me of a song my little sister used to always sing.....looked it up and here's a verse, seems quite apt for Anders.

Land of Make Believe

I've got a friend who comes to tea
And no-one else can see but me
He came today
But had to go
To visit you
You never know


Compus
 
I question if it really is a fact that people actually saw planes hitting the WTC towers (not counting on television of course ;)).

Huh? So there was no one...not one single person, in all of Manhattan...a city of over 1.6 million people...the most densely populated city in the US...that bothered to step outside, or look out a window on the morning of 9/11? Even though the tallest building in the city was on fire? Damn...them New Yorkers are some seriously apathetic S.O.B.'s! :)

You do realize the chance of that happening is about the same chance of me winning the lottery and being struck by two separate lightning bolts, while having group sex with the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders?
 
I question if it really is a fact that people actually saw planes hitting the WTC towers (not counting on television of course ;)).

You can do what you call "question" all you want. It just has nothing to do with reality.

Anders, how did your alleged video fakery generate the huge (and unusual) roar of the low-flying jets heard by millions as the jets flew the length of Manhattan island?
 
Last edited:
I have no doubt Mr Praimnath was lying. although I am glad he managed to avoid the engine power plant hurtling over his head heading off for Murray Street.

However the fact that Mr Praimnath was lying does not automatically prove that nothing flying hit the WTC.

why do you think he was lying about the plane coming towards him and him ducking under the desk?

TAM:)
 
Anders, how did your alleged video fakery generate the huge (and unusual) roar of the low-flying jets heard by millions as the jets flew the length of Manhattan island?


Without getting too technical, it involved Michael Winslow and a REALLY big speaker.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom