• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Understanding False Flag operations

abaddon said:
Leaving aside your unreadable and unreasonable formatting, the bottom line in all of that is that you do not understand what the term "false-flag" actually means, so you are simply going to avoid your misconception and attempt to redefine the term to mean whatever it is you want it to mean.

If you consider that to be in any way a valid line of argument, then any and all of the rest of us are free to redefine the term "false-flag" as we see fit. OK then. I define the term "false-flag" to be synonymous with "potato". Henceforward, I will use the synonym. Because I prefer it.

Tell us more about your claimed potatoes which are occurring all the time.
Click to expand...

It's funny how the War on Reason is so frequently waged coincident with the War on Paragraphs.
 
I was hoping that the OP would demonstrate an understanding of what a "False Flag" was.

Boy, was I disappointed, not surprised, just disappointed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
'I don't know what you mean by "glory",' Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. 'Of course you don't — till I tell you. I meant "there's a nice knock-down argument for you!"'

'But "glory" doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument",' Alice objected.

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
 
Does one pledge allegiance to a false flag? And if so, does one stand up or sit down?
 
Malbec said:
Along with Cyber Warfare , FFs are todays really smart weapons because the culprits are hard to spot when you control the MSM and when the trail is well hidden .Fortunately , and almost as though some strange cosmic reason seems to apply , culprits are always slipshod , poorly prepared and perhaps more stupid than those that seek to expose them .
Click to expand...

This, I think, is the key. The conspiracy theorist must hold the conflicting views that the conspirators are at the same time fiendishly clever and criminally stupid; and that he himself is an intellectual giant, able to spot the patterns in history that almost everyone else misses because they are so well hidden, yet that these patterns are so obvious that only the unending efforts of biased media are able to hide the fact that the vast majority of the population have figured them out. It's a point of view so desperately ridden with fatal internal contradictions that it's almost impossible to put into words, which may be why its proponents find it so difficult to express themselves coherently.

Dave
 
Mind control comes with a False Flag Attack, and a FFA comes under mind control techniques. It depends upon the planners' intent.

The tactic has come a long way from a Man O War flying bogus colors.

If true, Menachim Begin's Irgun bombing the King David Hotel to frame arabs would be another example.

I think COINTELPRO provides another suitable example

Side note:
....how much massive mass mind control a controlled major media like TVnews can accomplish in a few seconds.
 
Last edited:
promo248121207

All 350 million of you will be unable to see this False Flag operation, except for Malbec and maybe some of his looney friends.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Mind control comes with a False Flag Attack, and a FFA comes under mind control techniques. It depends upon the planners' intent.

The tactic has come a long way from a Man O War flying bogus colors.

If true, Menachim Begin's Irgun bombing the King David Hotel to frame arabs would be another example.
Click to expand...
The King David Hotel bombing was not a false flag attack. The Irgun never intended to try to blame the bombing on the Arabs and never did.
 
Craig4 said:
Care to provide evidence such mind control technology exists?
Click to expand...



Maybe you will recognize it as deception. Lying. Gas lighting. Religion. Indoctrination. Some people believe their authorities' media systems.

I think that when deception succeeds/convinces beyond doubt, it controls how the person(s) think, perceive. I consider that a form of mind control.

Supposedly the crying woman that the TV News told us "witnessed" Saddam's troops killing babies in a maternity ward was later found to be a lying daughter of a wealthy Saudi. That would be an example, if true.
 
Last edited:
Axxman300 said:
How many times in the past 2 months as the event in Orlando been in the news? (1)

The shooter's motives were confusing, was he gay, or Islamic and gay?

The result is that nobody cares, and most Americans right now would need to be reminded about the event, as it had faded from memory under a stack of many more shootings.

So your cause and effect is right down the toilet. It's not the Reichstag Fire.
Click to expand...

The Orlando Murders also made his employer, G4S Security, look very bad. If there's any company that's part of the "New World Order", it's G4S. So apparently the NWO faked Orlando to make itself look bad! :crazy: But I'm sure that conspiracists can explain that, too.
 
ddt said:
The King David Hotel bombing was not a false flag attack. The Irgun never intended to try to blame the bombing on the Arabs and never did.
Click to expand...


As you wish.

Makes a good example of FFA, nonetheless.
 
Redwood said:
The Orlando Murders also made his employer, G4S Security, look very bad. If there's any company that's part of the "New World Order", it's G4S. So apparently the NWO faked Orlando to make itself look bad! :crazy: But I'm sure that conspiracists can explain that, too.
Click to expand...



Are you sure you're sure?

As if evil wouldn't sacrifice its own.

Even the good guys do that when necessary to defeat evil.
 
ddt said:
The King David Hotel bombing was not a false flag attack. The Irgun never intended to try to blame the bombing on the Arabs and never did.
Click to expand...

True- the Irgun murderers did it and were clearly known to have done it. Never did get what they deserved for their terrorism!!!!!
 
Bubba said:
Maybe you will recognize it as deception. Lying. Gas lighting. Religion. Indoctrination. Some people believe their authorities' media systems.

I think that when deception succeeds/convinces beyond doubt, it controls how the person(s) think, perceive. I consider that a form of mind control.

Supposedly the crying woman that the TV News told us "witnessed" Saddam's troops killing babies in a maternity ward was later found to be a lying daughter of a wealthy Saudi. That would be an example, if true.
Click to expand...

That's hardly mind control. Influence perhaps but no one is in control of anyone's mind in those examples.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom