• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

UK - December 2019 General Election

Maybe some of them will be so pissed off they'll stand as unofficial Brexit party candidates, and spoil Nigel's day.

I guess they can stand as independents, there are probably rules against them standing using the name they've got in all their publicity materials.
 
I guess they can stand as independents, there are probably rules against them standing using the name they've got in all their publicity materials.

Probably, but this might be muddied by the Brexit party being a limited company, not a political party. In any case, they could probably get away with using the leaflets and posters they already have by stickering them with 'Independent' or some such.
 
I guess they can stand as independents, there are probably rules against them standing using the name they've got in all their publicity materials.
Can the Brexit party actually stop them standing? As far as I can tell they have done all the necessary work, paid the fees and registered. Can Nigel stop them legally?
 
Probably, but this might be muddied by the Brexit party being a limited company, not a political party. In any case, they could probably get away with using the leaflets and posters they already have by stickering them with 'Independent' or some such.

That's what Wayne "I spent 10k, and all Nige gave me was this T-shirt" is planning on doing.
 
But they would be pro-Brexit.

Well obviously they'd BE pro-Brexit, but they'd campaign as anti-Brexit in order to split the anti-Brexit vote, thus allowing the pro-Brexit candidate who actually campaigned as pro-Brexit to win.

It's all quite simple really.
 
Under the Conservatives' decade-long stewardship, NHS performance has fallen off a cliff.

A&E waiting times hit worst-ever level

The data from NHS England showed 83.6% of patients arriving at A&E were treated or admitted in four hours.

The target is 95%. It has not been met since July 2015.

Other targets covering cancer and routine hospital treatment are also being missed.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-50397856

I guess the issue is that the NHS is a monolithic state enterprise, once the Tories can get around to selling it off piece by piece to US healthcare companies, performance will increase and costs will fall :rolleyes:
 
Under the Conservatives' decade-long stewardship, NHS performance has fallen off a cliff.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-50397856

I guess the issue is that the NHS is a monolithic state enterprise, once the Tories can get around to selling it off piece by piece to US healthcare companies, performance will increase and costs will fall :rolleyes:


It's worth noting that health policy is devolved and there are four independent health services in the UK, with reciprocal agreements for treating each other's patients. Also, at least as far as Scotland is concerned, this didn't begin with devolution at the turn of the century. The Scottish NHS has always been an entirely separate beast. Performance varies quite a lot between the four organisations, and that's worth a mention.

However I take your point. I was living in England from 1982 unti 2006 and I saw a dreadful decline under Thatcher and Major, and if Blair did anything to be proud of it was that he increased investment in the NHS and brought performance up to fairly acceptable levels. When Cameron was elected I hoped that his rhetoric about protecting the NHS might even be sincere, particularly in view of his personal experience with his epileptic son, but alas it was not to be. It all seems to be back in the state it was in the 1990s, or even worse.
 
Not being flippant, but even failing to reach the 95% target, the vast majority of people are still admitted or treated within four hours, and obviously it's all about individual urgency, rather than everyone being dealt with in the order they arrive.

As it happens, what I thought was going to be a routine ECG a few weeks back (referral from GP to the hospitals drop-in service, with no specific appointment), resulted in me being immediately sent to A&E, and I was seen in less than ten minutes. They then didn't let me leave until some three hours after I'd arrived in the first place.
 
Not being flippant, but even failing to reach the 95% target, the vast majority of people are still admitted or treated within four hours, and obviously it's all about individual urgency, rather than everyone being dealt with in the order they arrive.

As it happens, what I thought was going to be a routine ECG a few weeks back (referral from GP to the hospitals drop-in service, with no specific appointment), resulted in me being immediately sent to A&E, and I was seen in less than ten minutes. They then didn't let me leave until some three hours after I'd arrived in the first place.

If not meeting the target isn't really an issue then they have the wrong targets surely? Which would be a different but equally serious problem
 
If they win three elections in a row. Don't hold your breath.

And maybe some free food for children and indeed anyone who is hungry would be a better use of the money.
 
Free broadband.

I hate to say it, but they almost deserve to lose if that's an early campaign pledge. It's so easy to label it as "crackpot communism" and BT has already put their own much higher (100B) costing on it.

Pathetic politics.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom