• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

Stacyhs said:
Will it become a US territory before or after he takes over Greenland and Canada becomes the 51st state?
Click to expand...
I remember when a statement like that would stop the presses and be on a constant 24 hour news cycle. I haven't even seen a blurb about it on any news channel.
 

The BBC is seeking to subpoena President Donald Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr., his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner in connection with a $10 billion defamation lawsuit the president is pressing against the U.K. broadcaster.

Lawyers for the BBC say the Trump family members “without question have personal knowledge” about President Trump’s intentions in delivering the speech at the heart of the case: his Jan. 6, 2021, address to supporters at the Ellipse as the Capitol attack was getting underway.
Click to expand...
 
Armitage72 said:
View attachment 74571
Click to expand...
What’s sadly ironic about this administration constantly but-Bidening seemingly every aspect of their failures, both policy and personal, is that the next president and crew, if Democrats, will have a legitimate claim to turn the tables, probably for their full four-year (maybe eight) efforts to clean up the explosive-diarrhea of biblical proportions Trump and his fellow felons* continually, relentlessly sprayed on, God bless us, everyone.

And that, dear friends, is a sentence.

*Rhetorical license claimed.
 
This will boost morale. It's like he deliberately thinks of the worst thing he can say, then says it.

bbc.com

Trump on USS Lincoln deployment: 'Not nearly long enough'

President Donald Trump also denied that family members were concerned about the welfare of their relatives on board the US aircraft carrier.
bbc.com bbc.com
Oh please please please let Fox News pick up this clip.

Mr. Trump’s comments came in response to a reporter who asked about the reported conditions stemming from the extended deployment, which have included shortages of basic supplies, safety and hygiene issues and deteriorating mental health. When the reporter said that the crew members’ families were concerned, Mr. Trump said, “No, they’re not.”

The president, who was about to depart the Washington area for an event in New York, was asked whether he was concerned about the crew’s mental health and whether he thought the deployment had gone on too long.

“No. No. No,” he said. “Not nearly long enough.”
Click to expand...
 
tldr; Gimme my ballroom!

Donald Trump
@realDonaldTrump
These are the TREASONISTS that brought the suit against the Military. They revealed Top Military Secrets!

“The National Trust for Historic Preservation” is a beautiful name, but even their name is fake because when they add the words “in the United States” to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not. In fact, the United States refused to continue funding it in 2005 because they strongly disagreed with their mission and objectives. They are very bad for our Country. They stop many projects that are worthy, and hurt many others. In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, and the Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, and Cabinet members. They were asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because of the Top Secret nature of the important facility being built. They were shown detailed plans and specifications of this knitted, unified, and cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service. But this did not deter them because they suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, commonly referred to as TDS, as noted by Democrat Senator John Fetterman, of Pennsylvania. The lower section does not work without the upper section and, likewise, the upper section does not work without the lower. It is all one highly integrated unit.

The then President of the National Trust, who brought the case, Carol Quillen, had no background in Historic Preservation, and has been replaced, unanimously, effective immediately. This is similar to her departure from Davidson College, where she was, likewise, dismissed, but the people of our Country are forced to live on with her bad decision, especially that of revealing to everyone, including our enemies throughout the World, the Top Secret Military features of the Building that are already built, and/or under construction, such as the DronePort, which occupies the entire roof.

There is absolutely no argument that a woman walking her dog in the vicinity of the White House has STANDING to stop such a desperately needed National Security structure for the people of the United States of America, as it will provide Presidents, current and future, a secure space to do their jobs, especially when she never saw the Building, because it had not risen, and she had no rendering, or pictures of the Building because they, also, were in the formative stages of production. This woman is not a “walker,” she is an activist, or serial plaintiff, who is involved in much other frivolous litigation throughout the City. In fact, whenever the National Trust files a lawsuit, she seems to be involved. So, she walked at the site of the White House, where there was no Building, and it bothered her, but she also walks in front of all of those other places, where she must also be bothered, and hence, additional court cases? She has no Clearances, or expertise whatsoever, in National Security, Defense, or required protections for the President. She has absolutely no standing to be involved in this case and, in fact, her name is not even mentioned as a plaintiff in the case! It is this kind of gross and flagrant abuse of our Courts that is exactly why Americans are losing faith in our System of Justice. It is so bad for our Country! President DONALD J. TRUMP
 
PitPat said:
tldr; Gimme my ballroom!

Donald Trump
@realDonaldTrump
These are the TREASONISTS that brought the suit against the Military. They revealed Top Military Secrets!

“The National Trust for Historic Preservation” is a beautiful name, but even their name is fake because when they add the words “in the United States” to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not. In fact, the United States refused to continue funding it in 2005 because they strongly disagreed with their mission and objectives. They are very bad for our Country. They stop many projects that are worthy, and hurt many others. In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, and the Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, and Cabinet members. They were asked by the United States Military not to bring this suit because of the Top Secret nature of the important facility being built. They were shown detailed plans and specifications of this knitted, unified, and cohesive structure by Top Officers and Leaders in both the Military and Secret Service. But this did not deter them because they suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, commonly referred to as TDS, as noted by Democrat Senator John Fetterman, of Pennsylvania. The lower section does not work without the upper section and, likewise, the upper section does not work without the lower. It is all one highly integrated unit.

The then President of the National Trust, who brought the case, Carol Quillen, had no background in Historic Preservation, and has been replaced, unanimously, effective immediately. This is similar to her departure from Davidson College, where she was, likewise, dismissed, but the people of our Country are forced to live on with her bad decision, especially that of revealing to everyone, including our enemies throughout the World, the Top Secret Military features of the Building that are already built, and/or under construction, such as the DronePort, which occupies the entire roof.

There is absolutely no argument that a woman walking her dog in the vicinity of the White House has STANDING to stop such a desperately needed National Security structure for the people of the United States of America, as it will provide Presidents, current and future, a secure space to do their jobs, especially when she never saw the Building, because it had not risen, and she had no rendering, or pictures of the Building because they, also, were in the formative stages of production. This woman is not a “walker,” she is an activist, or serial plaintiff, who is involved in much other frivolous litigation throughout the City. In fact, whenever the National Trust files a lawsuit, she seems to be involved. So, she walked at the site of the White House, where there was no Building, and it bothered her, but she also walks in front of all of those other places, where she must also be bothered, and hence, additional court cases? She has no Clearances, or expertise whatsoever, in National Security, Defense, or required protections for the President. She has absolutely no standing to be involved in this case and, in fact, her name is not even mentioned as a plaintiff in the case! It is this kind of gross and flagrant abuse of our Courts that is exactly why Americans are losing faith in our System of Justice. It is so bad for our Country! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Click to expand...
This sounds like that bat-◊◊◊◊ crazy, Navarro. Not Nazi enough for Miller, and about 1000 words too big and long for Trump.
 
So, lets assume the delusional grifting pedophile's fantasy becomes a reality and the rest of the world accepts the US unilaterally declare the strait of Hormuz a US territory, does that mean anyone in there is a US citizen?
I'd be interested to see how many boats will suddenly float into that strait with new US citizens.
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
So, lets assume the delusional grifting pedophile's fantasy becomes a reality and the rest of the world accepts the US unilaterally declare the strait of Hormuz a US territory, does that mean anyone in there is a US citizen?
I'd be interested to see how many boats will suddenly float into that strait with new US citizens.
Click to expand...
Where will they build the border wall?
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
So, lets assume the delusional grifting pedophile's fantasy becomes a reality and the rest of the world accepts the US unilaterally declare the strait of Hormuz a US territory, does that mean anyone in there is a US citizen?
I'd be interested to see how many boats will suddenly float into that strait with new US citizens.
Click to expand...
No, because residents of US territories aren't automatically US citizens.
 
shemp said:
dailyboulder.com

CIA doubted Trump assassination threat, but proceeded with secret plane swap because Trump believed he was in danger: Report

The CIA reportedly had “low confidence” in a warning from Israel that Iran might try to assassinate Donald Trump. According to a report, U.S. intelligence officials received the warning from Israel ahead of Trump's departure from Turkey following the NATO summit in Ankara. But officials...
dailyboulder.com dailyboulder.com

CIA doubted Trump assassination threat, but proceeded with secret plane swap because Trump believed he was in danger: Report​

Click to expand...
Uh huh,

 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
So, lets assume the delusional grifting pedophile's fantasy becomes a reality and the rest of the world accepts the US unilaterally declare the strait of Hormuz a US territory, does that mean anyone in there is a US citizen?
I'd be interested to see how many boats will suddenly float into that strait with new US citizens.
Click to expand...
Maternity cruises
 
Planigale said:
No, because residents of US territories aren't automatically US citizens.
Click to expand...
Google says :

People born in Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands are automatic U.S. citizens by birth. The only major U.S. territory where people are not automatic citizens is American Samoa, where residents are born as U.S. nationals instead.
 
BBC seeks to subpoena Trump's family members in Panorama lawsuit

Court filings show that representatives for the BBC's legal team attempted in May to serve subpoenas to the president's son Donald Trump Jr, his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner...

The BBC's lawyers argue in the latest filing that Trump's family members had "personal knowledge" of his intentions in delivering the speech, making their testimony and documents relevant to the president's defamation claim...

The filing asks the court to allow the subpoenas to be served by email and certified mail, saying attempts to serve them by hand were unsuccessful...

www.bbc.co.uk

BBC seeks to subpoena Trump's family members in Panorama lawsuit

The BBC's lawyers argue Trump's family members "have personal knowledge" of his intentions in the speech he gave outside the US Capitol on 6 January 2021.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom