Trump, Man of Science?

[NoahFence]

Funny about the pottery question, people thought I was leading into a discussion about Clinton and Trump... ..who is more wise or intelligent or whatever. I wasn't, but it has become one of those irrational vectors that display the wonders of human understanding.
So now, it is going to be an experiment. Lets see if anybody can accurately predict teh track and conversation I had in mind when I asked about the books and pottery.

Oh boy, the more I write, the more fun this sounds.



8 or 9 seasons says most people that knew anything about him (I dont watch television, so I hardly knew who he was. In fact, I first met Trump at Debate 2 of the General), did not mind seeing him come back into their living rooms the next year.



Are you trying to tell me how to think, or trying to tell me what I was thinking?

I call BS at the highlighted.

 

[uke2se]

I call BS at the highlighted.

Quite obviously. But it's important for him to know that he's more important than us.

 

[Dave Rogers]

That's more than four months old.

One of the many bizarre aspects of this election campaign has been watching the disintegration of Scott Adams' integrity. He started out by saying that he wasn't particularly in favour of Trump, but that Trump was going to win. As that's got less likely, he's got more pro-Trump, to the point where he is now claiming that ISIS supports Hillary Clinton, apparently in order to manufacture a means to ridicule anyone who disagrees with him. He's descended into full-blown pseudoscience in his methodology now, it seems, in that he makes a prediction of people's responses then retroactively declares any and all responses to be in agreement with his prediction. And I see that UWdood is preparing the ground for the same sort of charade.

Dave

 

[UWdood]

You are an important individual and there are people who enjoy your company.

But I want to know if you enjoy my company.

Thought you should know that, as your posts here are coming off as slightly self-centered and insecure.

I have no problem being self-centered. Insecure? On an internet forum? I'll have you know, I have no problems down there.

It's the first I have heard of such rumours

I love how you responded to me line by line, even mentioning this one.

*YAWN*

I have a cat.

 

[uke2se]

But I want to know if you enjoy my company.

We haven't met, so I wouldn't know. I'm sure you're a Lovely individual when you're not ****posting.

I have no problem being self-centered. Insecure? On an internet forum? I'll have you know, I have no problems down there.

In Australia?

 

[Spindrift]

8 or 9 seasons says most people that knew anything about him (I dont watch television, so I hardly knew who he was. In fact, I first met Trump at Debate 2 of the General), did not mind seeing him come back into their living rooms the next year.

Not MOST people, the best ratings for the Apprentice was the first season and it went steadily downhill each year until it drew 4.5 million and it had to be changed to Celebrity Apprentice, because Trump by himself could not draw a sufficient audience. Even then it was not much of a success. At the end more people watched "State of Affairs", whatever that was. Less than 2.5% of the US feel that the Donald was must see TV.

 

[ddt]

You are an important individual and there are people who enjoy your company.

Thought you should know that, as your posts here are coming off as slightly self-centered and insecure.

You're all individuals!

 

[UWdood]

I call BS at the highlighted.

I am only on post 11. Yet you are claiming you know me well enough to know how interested I have been in politics. You did not question whether I was telling the truth about watching TV, but you think I am indeed some political junkie.

I'll have you know, I kind of remember cable news form 2004 or so, when I completely stopped watching it. I watched no debates between 2008 - 2016, except one McCain Obama debate, which was Booooring. Oh, I don't vote. I might register for Trump, but my ego is not tied into his victory. I really hate television and movies and political puppet shows. They are so tiresome and lame.

This one though... ...now that's entertainment.

We haven't met, so I wouldn't know.

No you don't know.

 

[NoahFence]

Quite obviously. But it's important for him to know that he's more important than us.

Oh, well that's just understood!

 

[Stacko]

One of the many bizarre aspects of this election campaign has been watching the disintegration of Scott Adams' integrity. He started out by saying that he wasn't particularly in favour of Trump, but that Trump was going to win. As that's got less likely, he's got more pro-Trump, to the point where he is now claiming that ISIS supports Hillary Clinton, apparently in order to manufacture a means to ridicule anyone who disagrees with him. He's descended into full-blown pseudoscience in his methodology now, it seems, in that he makes a prediction of people's responses then retroactively declares any and all responses to be in agreement with his prediction. And I see that UWdood is preparing the ground for the same sort of charade.

Dave

Only because you probably just started paying attention to him again. He's been an open misogynist for at least half a decade now. Watching him bend over backward to argue that the man must win isn't surprising.

 

[I Am The Scum]

So what are the odds that UWdood admits he was wrong after election day? I put it at less than 50%.

 

[NoahFence]

I am only on post 11. Yet you are claiming you know me well enough to know how interested I have been in politics. You did not question whether I was telling the truth about watching TV, but you think I am indeed some political junkie.

Working under the assumption that this is your first foray into the ISF / JREF forums, you should know that your posting style has been seen here many, many times.

Call it a body of work for a mindset.

Mostly in the Conspiracy Theory forums though.

 

[UWdood]

So what are the odds that UWdood admits he was wrong after election day? I put it at less than 50%.

I put it at 0%.

Mostly in the Conspiracy Theory forums though.

Do you think there will be any trials for the Podesta email revelations? What about convictions?

 

[uke2se]

So what are the odds that UWdood admits he was wrong after election day? I put it at less than 50%.

I'd say less than Trump has of being elected president, so not good.

 

[Dave Rogers]

I put it at 0%.

As do we all.

Dave

 

[NoahFence]

So what are the odds that UWdood admits he was wrong after election day? I put it at less than 50%.

He'll flame out long before then.

 

[UWdood]

He'll flame out long before then.

Hey, you're right. I actually already came what I wanted to come here for.

I won't be back to gloat, I think we can all agree on that.

See ya!

 

[Spindrift]

I am only on post 11. Yet you are claiming you know me well enough to know how interested I have been in politics. You did not question whether I was telling the truth about watching TV, but you think I am indeed some political junkie.

I'll have you know, I kind of remember cable news form 2004 or so, when I completely stopped watching it. I watched no debates between 2008 - 2016, except one McCain Obama debate, which was Booooring. Oh, I don't vote. I might register for Trump, but my ego is not tied into his victory. I really hate television and movies and political puppet shows. They are so tiresome and lame.

This one though... ...now that's entertainment.



No you don't know.

I'm going to call it on gut, not on statistics.

 

[uke2se]

Hey, you're right. I actually already came what I wanted to come here for.

I won't be back to gloat, I think we can all agree on that.

See ya!

Good bye, and have a nice weekend.

 

[NoahFence]

Do you think there will be any trials for the Podesta email revelations? What about convictions?

Nope. I didn't see anything illegal in them.