True skeptics are 'conspiracy theorists'

[jsfisher]

Case-by-case? Oh so that's the remedy you need to avoid seeing the truth?
I prefer to see the context.

You are not a Bush supporter? I would say that you're not only a Bush lover but a Bush butt kisser. Proud?

Well, pagan, perhaps there is a favorite 9/11 topic you'd like to discuss, preferably without any over generalizations and ad hominem remarks--just facts and educated opinion. You have free-reign to pick the subject matter; just be considerate enough to stay on that topic. Many poor debaters attempt to quickly switch from subject to subject rather than make a valid point. I am sure you are more capable than that.

 

[Z]

39

... and still living in your parents' basement, downloading pictures of Sarah Michelle Geller*, and watching your X-Files DVD collection, occasionally screaming, "Yes! The truth is out there!"?

*ok, who DOESN'T still do this?

 

[pagan]

Well, pagan, perhaps there is a favorite 9/11 topic you'd like to discuss, preferably without any over generalizations and ad hominem remarks--just facts and educated opinion. You have free-reign to pick the subject matter; just be considerate enough to stay on that topic. Many poor debaters attempt to quickly switch from subject to subject rather than make a valid point. I am sure you are more capable than that.

Be my guest and choose the topic yourself. So you believe in The Bush adm conspiracy theory? I am prepared to debunk any Bush **** you come up with.

 

[gumboot]

Be my guest and choose the topic yourself. So you believe in The Bush adm conspiracy theory? I am prepared to debunk any Bush **** you come up with.

If you wouldn't mind, could you present some examples of lies that the Bush administration have presented regarding 9/11?

-Gumboot

 

[CHF]

39

And still living at home?

 

[pagan]

... and still living in your parents' basement, downloading pictures of *, and watching your X-Files DVD collection, occasionally screaming, "Yes! The truth is out there!"?

*ok, who DOESN'T still do this?

You are exposed!

Sarah M Geller. Is a cutie, but not a beauty. Not the kind a grown man fall in love with.

 

[jsfisher]

Be my guest and choose the topic yourself. So you believe in The Bush adm conspiracy theory? I am prepared to debunk any Bush **** you come up with.

Ok, I will oblige by choosing a topic. By the way, please do not assume you know what I believe or don't. Also, if you really were targeting for a civil discussion, you might want to be a little less rabid in your posts....Just some friendly advice.

How about this topic: The Pentagon was hit by a commercial airliner on the morning of 9/11/2001.

 

[Z]

You are exposed!

Sarah M Geller. Is a cutie, but not a beauty. Not the kind a grown man fall in love with.

Love? Who said anything about love?

I just think she's good to look at. Same with Jennifer Love Hewitt.

I fall in love with an entirely different style of woman, safe to say. But I'm married, not buried; the day I stop looking at 'cute' is the day I lay in my grave.

 

[Paulhoff]

View attachment 5748

 

[gumboot]

Paulhoff gets my vote. Keira Knightley is the most beautiful creature on this entire planet.

Including the loveli lakes.

-Gumboot

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

39

Your profile says 47. Why are you lying to us, pagan?

For posterity:

 

[Z]

Paulhoff... um... ok, I saved that piccy. Thank you.

Actually, I do tend to like brunettes better than blondes. And I love Asian and Hispanic women.

But overall - and I hate myself for admitting this - I'm a Jolie fan. Not that I care for most of her flicks, but I've liked watching her in every role I've seen her in. (She was especially fun to watch in Girl, Interrupted and in Mr. & Mrs. Smith)

BUT THAT'S OFF TOPIC!

 

[A W Smith]

Love? Who said anything about love?

I fall in love with an entirely different style of woman, safe to say. But I'm married, not buried; the day I stop looking at 'cute' is the day I lay in my grave.

me too, bolding mine. But Im glad to see Victoria Recano is back on the air doing segments for "the insider" after I first watched her on tech Tv (formerly zdtv) years ago

View attachment 5750

 

[Z]

me too, bolding mine. But Im glad to see Victoria Recano is back on the air doing segments for "the insider" after I first watched her on tech Tv (formerly zdtv) years ago

[qimg]http://www.victoriarecano.com/images/photoalbum/images/VictoriaRe_Vespa_3473986_400.jpg[/qimg]

Wow... She is quite lovely. Maybe a bit too much nose for my tastes, but still rather lovely.

Of course, I'm a hand man myself... Beautiful face and ugly hands? Forget it. Rapid turn-off. That's part of my problem in declaring Drew Barrymore to be anything but 'cute' - her hands are so... I don't know. Odd.

Audrey Hepburn had very awesome hands. But her neck was too long.

...Hey... how did we get side-tracked discussing lovely ladies? I mean, it's a good topic - don't get me wrong - but isn't this WAAAY off topic?

 

[Mr.D]

But later that afternoon, Paul flirted shamelessly with two of my female graduate students and tried to get their home telephone numbers. This paradoxical combination of loss of libido and a preoccupation with sexual rituals is not unusual in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

It is just coincidence that I had read this book right before DJJ started posting, but I think this explains much of the behaviour we have seen on this and other threads.

Woah.

It would go a long way towards explaining this:http://tinyurl.com/2aablz (now if we could only explain this ... http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/rappak/)

 

[Miss Anthrope]

. Not the kind a grown man fall in love with.

After saying that, I say: Nope, not 39. No way.

 

[Miss Anthrope]

Your profile says 47. Why are you lying to us, pagan?

For posterity:

Ha, I knew it!

17!

 

[Hokulele]

Woah.

It would go a long way towards explaining this:http://tinyurl.com/2aablz (now if we could only explain this ... http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/rappak/)

Ack, bleah, ick, ptooie. I feel like I just stepped in something. Curses on you Mr. D for making me click on that first link.

 

[stateofgrace]

Case-by-case? Oh so that's the remedy you need to avoid seeing the truth?
I prefer to see the context.

You are not a Bush supporter? I would say that you're not only a Bush lover but a Bush butt kisser. Proud?

Actually you are.

You are crediting him being able to plan, carry and cover up the perfect crime. You are crediting him and the current administration with the ability, knowledge, political power and finical ability to do the unthinkable.

You are crediting them with the ability to fool virtually every single structural engineer, civil engineer and architect on the planet. You are crediting them with the ability to secretly rig three large building in the centre of New York, with explosives without anybody noticing. You give them credit for remotely controlling planes so into large buildings. You give them credit for covering up and disguising the fact that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon , in broad day light in front of potentially hundreds of witnesses. You give them credit for faking evidence, removing evidence, planting evidence, destroying evidence and ignoring evidence. You give the credit for faking phone calls, faking black boxes, faking DNA, faking body parts, faking photographs and faking personnel effects from the passengers. You give the further credit for faking UBL confessions, for secretly funding Al Qaeda, for training the terrorists and for not only missing the forewarning but actually coming up with the most complex and massive conspiracy in the history of complex conspiracies.

You are giving them credit for controlling NIST and making sure the reports they produced was a complete whitewash. You are crediting them with the ability to control completely the 911 commissions findings and ensure that it was a complete white wash. You credit them for completely controlling the mass media. You give them credit for their cast iron grip on every single person that was needed to carry out such a dreadful act.You are crediting them with being so powerful that everybody simply obeys them without question , without remorse and without any form of humanity whatsoever.

You are crediting them with the ability to find literally hundreds of people that would participate in cold blooded heartless murder of their fellow countrymen and remain so loyal to their leaders they would not say a word.You give them credit for their ability to brainwash literally billions into beleiving their plans and simply go along with it.

How does it feel to be a Bush butt licker? For you more than anybody believes the current US administration has complete and ultimate control over literally billions of people from across the planet. This is what you believe, not I my friend.

Keep kissing butt, you seem to like it. Are you proud ?

 

[twinstead]

Pagan it's really hard to debate somebody who thinks everybody who disagrees with him is blind.

Spew your ideological spittle all you want and keep blaming ME for your lack of a case that 911 was an inside job if it makes you feel superior.

I'm comfortable enough in my own personal investigation to just hold my tongue and let YOU look like the stark, raving ideologue you really are.

Proud?

ETA: Oh, and I love when you say you prefer to look at things 'in context'. Normally that's good, but when used as a euphemism for 'connecting a bunch of unrelated things' like you use it, then it's just funny.