This place is overflowing with kooks.

There was no "public outcry for a law-and-order government

You're worse than stooges: you don't even have an argument to begin with! How utterly pathetic! Hahaha

Re-read the post.

But you got your missiles, didn't ja?
-event.

You are in the right thread; you started the thread; you are the thread.
 
you are just trolling so you can ***** with people.


I'll be the first to admit that I am indeed trolling. My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box. I'm ****ing with you for my own personal amusement. I have no illusions that any argument I make will affect any of you in the slightest. It's sort of like arguing with religious fundamentalists. While feigning a profound skepticism, most of you evidence astonishing credulity. You simply haven't done your homework. You apparently know next-to-nothing about operations of state. Rather than mitigating this ignorance, however, you choose to take a dogmatic contrarian position to deep politics and dismiss rational analysis as "conspiracy theory". It's a very easy way, I admit, of protecting yourself from reality and ensuring that you don't have to do anything about your out-of-control government. Freud 101.

What do you have for your out of control mind?

Proof of your being a kook by starting the kook thread? You need to go to LC where reality is bad and fantasy is rewarded.

Did you get banned for being out-of-control like you are here over at Loose Change?

can you use bigger words, you put them together in such a out-of-control way.

Was this your best post?
 
Um....yup!

Do all of the CTers start in on the J word?


Yes, a lot of conspiracy theory stuff is anti-Semitic. It's usually a rehash of Henry Ford's 1920s "The International Jew," which itself is an updating of "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," which in turn updates material that dates back to the Middle Ages, which seem to in turn date back to eight sermons delivered by St. John Chrystosom in 387 AD.

He denounced the Jews as being carnal, lascivious, avaricious, and as drunkards, pimps, and criminals.

When we study the anti-Semitic material that has gushed from presses down to the present, we see that the same story, the same conspiracies, the same lies, are passed down, updated, and regurgitated.

What I find interesting is that this grand Jewish Conspiracy, in the past 2000 years, has never been able to finish the job.
 
My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box.

The box most of us live in has a large label on the side that reads "Real World". Thinking outside of it is generally not a good idea, and can often lead to making friends with the nice men in white coats and living in a room with bouncy walls.
 
How are you CT guys able to make it day to day?"

It's a constant struggle...not.

Actually sweetheart, us truthers lead relatively normal lives.

Yet there is always an instinctive urge toward revolution, I admit. We wackos conceive of a radically different society based on outmoded ideals like cooperation (syngergy) and equality.

The system is not just, therefore "truthers" oppose the system.. Some day, we hope and expect, the shills will go the way of the French Revolution. Not pretty, but necessary :)
Perhaps a few heads rolling round, but who's counting?

Bring it on.
So you propose violence and you expect to be taken seriously?

You preach bs about the FEMA camps and why you can be labeled as an enemy combatant and you stupidly call for violence and labeling yourself? Hope you enjoy life in gitmo. Can you hear the helicopters approaching?
 
If intelligence operatives plan a false flag attack it is possible for other operatives to get wind of the situation and not know its being planned by insiders.
So an agent of espionage found out about espionage that he was part of yet told us about it? use your brain.
:dl:
 
Wrong. The operatives can provocateur the attack to make it look like arab terrorists. All that is needed are double agents
So your saying the good operatives were fooled by the bad operatives. In other words you are saying they were incompetant. Wonder where I heard that before.
 
I'll be the first to admit that I am indeed trolling.

Troll? Are you more like an imp?

My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box.

With your first post you have proven to be unqualified and not capable of rational thought, in or out of the box.

I'm ****ing with you for my own personal amusement.

Proof of your rude nature and that you have limited abilities to learn or comprehend; nor do you intend to.

I have no illusions that any argument I make will affect any of you in the slightest.

Seem like the only illusion you are not suffering from.

It's sort of like arguing with religious fundamentalists. While feigning a profound skepticism, most of you evidence astonishing credulity.

There you go confusing faith with facts! Need not say more; you bring illusions and lies when facts are needed to argue. You start a pure junk and crap thread; Are facts beyond your simple comprehension?

You are the one with the CT problem; you are in the correct thread.


You simply haven't done your homework.

I hate homework; and doing homework to combat a troll is overkill. You are debunked as you post; each hunt and peck letter, debunked as it reaches the bottom of plunger of each key; each bit debunked as it moves across in 111011101010001011111000000101010000....

You apparently know next-to-nothing about operations of state.

I will not be looking forward for your perverted knowledge on this topic; it could be an Alex Jones view so far out only and Alex Jones idiot follower would understand. I expect as many lies from you as Alex Jones.

Rather than mitigating this ignorance, however, you choose to take a dogmatic contrarian position to deep politics and dismiss rational analysis as "conspiracy theory".

I doubt if you could mitigate your own failure to understand facts and evidence that constantly debunk you without your knowledge.

It appears you are one whose terminal stupidity stands between truth and knowledge and you have chosen biased political rhetoric to guide your conclusions over reason.

You can not mitigate your own problems; thank you

It's a very easy way, I admit, of protecting yourself from reality and ensuring that you don't have to do anything about your out-of-control government.

We vote; what do you do? You have a biased political problem in your head that helps you see CT everywhere. You could vote. Can you vote?

Freud 101.

So how long have you hated facts? Have you always had an aversion to facts? How long have you used google to find your facts? Or is this your pathetic web site of junk?
 
what a mass of confusion.

I suggest people dont respond to Morphology until he learns the valuable use of the Quote button on this forum.

Reading his glob of text is like reading a run on sentence.
 
what a mass of confusion.

I suggest people dont respond to Morphology until he learns the valuable use of the Quote button on this forum.

Reading his glob of text is like reading a run on sentence.
This is what I've been proposing for quite awhile.

Morphology - to use his beloved CT logic upon him - has STILL not provided a shred of evidence to conclude that he is NOT a baboon. Until he does that, it is rather pointless to engage him in any type of a debate.

Renounce your baboonery, Morphology, and you will then move into the next level of our rather stringent credibility tests: You will then need to prove that you are NOT a prepubescent boy just beginning to experience the overwhelming effects of rapid hormonal fluctuations.

By the way, here is a tangerine pellet...
 
I'll be the first to admit that I am indeed trolling. My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box. I'm ****ing with you for my own personal amusement. I have no illusions that any argument I make will affect any of you in the slightest. It's sort of like arguing with religious fundamentalists. While feigning a profound skepticism, most of you evidence astonishing credulity. You simply haven't done your homework. You apparently know next-to-nothing about operations of state. Rather than mitigating this ignorance, however, you choose to take a dogmatic contrarian position to deep politics and dismiss rational analysis as "conspiracy theory". It's a very easy way, I admit, of protecting yourself from reality and ensuring that you don't have to do anything about your out-of-control government. Freud 101.

You cut and paste from CT websites then accuse others of not being independent thinkers. I think you're funny hun. Please keep posting.
 
Moreover, the fact that "Madani Bouhouche, who worked for state security and was a member of a neo-Nazi paramilitary group Westland New Post (WNP), was arrested with one of the murder weapons" is of little or no consequence.
Bouhouche was not a member of the State Security but a member of the then national police force. And as far as I know he was never arrested with one of the murder weapons, nor was he member of WNP. Stop making **** up.
So, in the case of the Bende van Nijvel, what "political enemies" were blamed by whom, and how did the Belgian state run amok as a consequence of the 28 murders commited by the Bende?

Belgium is not a powerful state. Therefore the effects were not particularly dramatic, unless of course you’re a Belgian.

“The Supermarket massacres occurred during the period when the U.S. was pushing a plan to base the Euro-Missiles (nuclear-tipped Cruise missiles) in different European countries. The plan led to huge demonstrations in Europe, with certain countries threatening to break ranks with NATO. Belgium was one of those countries.
Belgium never threatened to break ranks with NATO. Stop making **** up.
Belgium was one of those countries. The Belgian Parliament, which investigated the incidents, felt that they were another attempt to sow confusion and fear among the populace, thereby generating public outcries for a law-and-order government which would be amenable to the Euro-Missles.”
Actually, the Senate found no evidence that the Bende van Nijvel was in any way connected to the stay-behind Network.

http://www.senate.be/lexdocs/S0523/S05231297.pdf (page 100)

Stop making **** up.
 
Last edited:
I'll be the first to admit that I am indeed trolling. My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box. I'm ****ing with you for my own personal amusement.

I was at a party last weekend where the host's brat 5-year-old was running around annoying people for his "own personal amusement." However, don't sell yourself short; I have to say that I find you much more amusing than that brat.

I have no illusions that any argument I make will affect any of you in the slightest.

From what I've read, I have to agree, but some accurate facts and logical reasoning might greatly improve your chances.:con2:
 
I was at a party last weekend where the host's brat 5-year-old was running around annoying people for his "own personal amusement."
I'd say your analogy is very appropriate. Many loosers are closer to that 5 year old, emotionally, intellectually and maturity wise then they are to a normal adult.

Okay, that may be a bit of stretch but not much.
 
you are just trolling so you can ***** with people.


I'll be the first to admit that I am indeed trolling. My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box. I'm ****ing with you for my own personal amusement. I have no illusions that any argument I make will affect any of you in the slightest. It's sort of like arguing with religious fundamentalists. While feigning a profound skepticism, most of you evidence astonishing credulity. You simply haven't done your homework. You apparently know next-to-nothing about operations of state. Rather than mitigating this ignorance, however, you choose to take a dogmatic contrarian position to deep politics and dismiss rational analysis as "conspiracy theory". It's a very easy way, I admit, of protecting yourself from reality and ensuring that you don't have to do anything about your out-of-control government. Freud 101.

Wow you are a funny guy eh? I bet you are just the life and soul of the party, cracking on your jokes about it all.

I bet everybody gathers around you and looks on in awe as you tell everybody how you are a freedom fighter and how you are going to bring down the nasty USG. I bet everybody you met just hero worships you and throws themselves at your feet. In fact I think you are GOD himself.

Please, oh mighty one forgive me for not believing your bolloxs. PLeeeease forgive me master, I am humbled to be even posting a response to your mighty thoughts.

Em maybe not, you silly little child.
 
I've always wanted to have a go at breaking down an argument point-by-point, just like I've seen others do in this forum. I thought I'd make a start with my considered opinion on the following:


I'll be the first to admit that I am indeed trolling. My assumption, based on a glance at other threads, is that most of the people on this forum are simply incapable of thinking outside the box.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Oh, you're serious. . .

I'm ****ing with you for my own personal amusement. I have no illusions that any argument I make will affect any of you in the slightest.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .wait, you're still serious?

It's sort of like arguing with religious fundamentalists.

AAAAAAhhhhh hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

While feigning a profound skepticism, most of you evidence astonishing credulity.

AAAAAAhhhhhh [choke, splutter] hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You simply haven't done your homework.

Stop it, you're killing me here!

You apparently know next-to-nothing about operations of state.

hahahahahaha ha ha

snigger

Rather than mitigating this ignorance, however, you choose to take a dogmatic contrarian position to deep politics and dismiss rational analysis as "conspiracy theory".

now come on, you'll set me off again [chuckle]

It's a very easy way, I admit, of protecting yourself from reality and ensuring that you don't have to do anything about your out-of-control government. Freud 101.

That's it, you've even set the dog off now.

:dl:
 

Back
Top Bottom