This place is overflowing with kooks.

You twoofers have a knack for changing the subject in rapid succession when you're loosing don't you?
 
random paranoid drivel

Not random kid. Hence: "on a related note". We're dealing with the so-called "strategy of tension." Here's a clue:

“This "strategy of tension," organized around a brutal campaign of terror and murder, resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people during the decades of the 1970s and '80s. The wave of terror led to the severe restriction of civil rights, with the 1975 law restricting popular campaigning and radical political discussion. Many people were locked up under "anti-terrorist" legislation (sound familiar?) or expelled from the country.”

“Gladio was "officially disbanded" by the Italian government
in December 1990 after the story broke. On January 29th, 1992 it
was officially declared to have been a clandestine and illegal
"armed band" involved in subversion, by an Italian parliamentary
commission on terrorism.”

'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

This was the essence of Operation Gladio, a decades-long covert campaign of terrorism and deceit directed by the intelligence services of the West -- against their own populations. Hundreds of innocent people were killed or maimed in terrorist attacks -- on train stations, supermarkets, cafes and offices -- which were then blamed on "leftist subversives" or other political opponents. The purpose, as stated above in sworn testimony by Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra, was to demonize designated enemies and frighten the public into supporting ever-increasing powers for government leaders -- and their elitist cronies."

That's a bit kooky.

It is was it is, kid. But hey, I'm not the one setting off bombs and blaming other people. ;)
 
Morphology,

Why are you calling Gravy "kid"? Are you THAT ignorant? Come on dude, bring some bullets if you're coming to a gun fight.
 
when you're loosing don't you?

Hahaha. Funny guy. :jaw-dropp

Look, I used the quote button. You should learn it yourself.

You haven't established a valid link between your arguments. [Rule 8] or get off the pot.

I calls it as I see it, young lady.

Really mature. So who's the kid? Tell me, honestly... how old are you? That's not a personal stab, I am actually interested in knowing.
 
You haven't established a valid link between your arguments.

Speak engrish?

I'll spell it out: bad people set off bombs, bad people blame their political enemies. Half-wits swallow obvious frame-up. Popuation terrorized. Population turns to state and begs protection. State runs amok.

Crystal? Al-righty then.
 
Random, paranoid, and drivel.

Repeat: strategy of tension. Buy a thesaurus or something. Stimulate your so-called mind.
 
Random:
1.proceeding, made, or occurring without definite aim, reason, or pattern: the random selection of numbers.

Paranoid:
–adjective 1.of, like, or suffering from paranoia.

Drivel:
2.childish, silly, or meaningless talk or thinking; nonsense; twaddle. –verb (used without object)

I'm sorry if I misinterperated you, but you said those 3 words are the same?


 
You haven't established a valid link between your arguments.

Speak engrish?

I'll spell it out: bad people set off bombs, bad people blame their political enemies. Half-wits swallow obvious frame-up. Popuation terrorized. Population turns to state and begs protection. State runs amok.

Crystal? Al-righty then.
So, in the case of the Bende van Nijvel, what "political enemies" were blamed by whom, and how did the Belgian state run amok as a consequence of the 28 murders commited by the Bende? :confused:

(Sorry guys if this is off-topic.)
 
Random:
1.proceeding, made, or occurring without definite aim, reason, or pattern: the random selection of numbers.


im·be·cile

1 usually offensive : a person affected with moderate mental retardation

Paranoid:
–adjective 1.of, like, or suffering from paranoia.


sa·ga·cious

keen in sense perception

Drivel:
2.childish, silly, or meaningless talk or thinking; nonsense; twaddle. –verb (used without object)


eva·sion

1 : a means of evading : DODGE
 
Bad people set off bombs, bad people blame their political enemies. Half-wits swallow obvious frame-up. Popuation terrorized. Population turns to state and begs protection. State runs amok.
People vote government out by overwhelming margin. Game over.
 
Morphology...

Clearly, you have lost your fingertip grip on reality and have descended into an abyss of irreversible lunacy. If ignorance were a disability, you'd get the full pension.

Use the quote tool. Without it your posts are indistinguishable and I fail to see the point you made with your last one.
 
People vote government out by overwhelming margin. Game over.

Did you vote for the CIA? How many out there think this country is a Democracy? Or is it more of a one party state masquerading as a two party state? The Democrats are on the inside what the Republicans are on the outside. Each having almost identical financial backers. . . Did you vote for the Pentagon? (NO!) Did you vote for Wall Street? (NO!) Did you vote for a nuclear arms race? (NO!) Did you vote for the CIA? (NO!) Ever try reading the Bill of rights to a cop? (No, LOL.) People didn't vote for star wars, people didn't vote for drug wars, no one voted for acid rain, no one voted for being homeless. Hardly anyone in this country votes at all anymore. Meanwhile people in places like China and South Africa are out their dying just for the right to vote. But in America, people take it for granted and they just pout and stay home, figuring their wishes aren't respected anyway
- jello biafra

In the hands of a people whose education has been willfully neglected, the ballot is a cunning swindle benefitting only the united barons of industry, trade and property. --Daniel Guérin

Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats, We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee.
- Hellen Keller
 
Standard CT-stuff.

No, you're right. While the Gladio units in every other country were setting off bombs and assassinating promiment officials, the Belgium Gladio unit sat on its hands and decided to "take the decade off". Moreover, the fact that "Madani Bouhouche, who worked for state security and was a member of a neo-Nazi paramilitary group Westland New Post (WNP), was arrested with one of the murder weapons" is of little or no consequence. Finally, Jean Bultot's admission to Belgian journalist René Haquin that "the killings were a state security destabilization operation with government participation "at every level" was sensless, albeit self-incriminating, blather.

So, in the case of the Bende van Nijvel, what "political enemies" were blamed by whom, and how did the Belgian state run amok as a consequence of the 28 murders commited by the Bende?

Belgium is not a powerful state. Therefore the effects were not particularly dramatic, unless of course you’re a Belgian.

“The Supermarket massacres occurred during the period when the U.S. was pushing a plan to base the Euro-Missiles (nuclear-tipped Cruise missiles) in different European countries. The plan led to huge demonstrations in Europe, with certain countries threatening to break ranks with NATO. Belgium was one of those countries. The Belgian Parliament, which investigated the incidents, felt that they were another attempt to sow confusion and fear among the populace, thereby generating public outcries for a law-and-order government which would be amenable to the Euro-Missles.”

Pretty basic stuff.

It is apparent to me that the individuals on this forum haven't the slightest clue of the way state intelligence agencies operate. You all need to visit your local library -- soon.
 
I notice that amongst these posts I encounter nary a single "debunker". Indeed, your pathetic ad hom parade confirms my previous contention: you got nuthin'! You're worse than stooges: you don't even have an argument to begin with! How utterly pathetic! Hahaha

you kinda have to make these things called "arguments" before others can debunk 'em, unless you believe in ESP...

it should be noted that relavent evidences you've alluded to thus far-- as i recall, without even posting source links!-- have been tracked down, and held to proper scrutiny, where they crumbled.

further insulting posts will result in nothing productive. you either are mistaken of how argument works, or you are just trolling so you can ***** with people. i am assuming you have some understanding of argument, so i suspect you are trolling. it seems apparent to me that you've no interest whatsoever in any sort of real argument.
 

Back
Top Bottom