• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Thermate

deep44 said:
Wow, you have them in your shop? That's fantastic. It doesn't change the fact that they are consistent with a therm*te reaction.
Click to expand...

And blood spilled all over the ground is consistent with being shot. Should police departments spend extra money "investigating" the possibility of a gunshot murder when there are no bullets or gunpowder residue anywhere on the scene and the victim is found with a sword sticking out of his chest? Because that is the logical extension of your inane argument.
 
I don’t think that LastChild is likely to do anything that could be perceived as substantiating his conspiracy theories. (This, thankfully, renders him fairly impotent when it comes to a new investigation, but there we are.)
 
TruthByDecree said:
What makes you think fire can cause steel to fail but thermate can't?
Click to expand...

Hold up, dude. In another thread, you were saying that a bunch of witnesses heard "explosions" that must have been demolitions. Now you argue for thermate?

I don't get it. Did demolition explosives bring down the towers, or did thermate?
 
1337m4n said:
Hold up, dude. In another thread, you were saying that a bunch of witnesses heard "explosions" that must have been demolitions. Now you argue for thermate?

I don't get it. Did demolition explosives bring down the towers, or did thermate?
Click to expand...

I don't know what brought down the towers there hasn't been an investigation. That's how I know you don't know. In any case doesn't Steven Jones claim thermate combined with explosive devices?
 
1337m4n said:
And blood spilled all over the ground is consistent with being shot. Should police departments spend extra money "investigating" the possibility of a gunshot murder when there are no bullets or gunpowder residue anywhere on the scene and the victim is found with a sword sticking out of his chest? Because that is the logical extension of your inane argument.
Click to expand...

Yeah I think they would have to at least investigate to find out there was no bullets or gunpowder anywhere. I also think one of the first things they would do is look to see if he was shot being that the victim was shot back in 1993 and this time was screaming "I've been shot again" before he fell down.
 
Unsecured Coins said:
well, back in 1993 they actually found peices of the gun, so... yeah. figure that one out
Click to expand...

Yeah well the victim and most of the evidence didn't spontaneously combust back in 93 either so... yeah. figure that one out too. I also think this time around they should have investigated the body before it was moved to the cemetery.
 
TruthByDecree said:
Yeah I think they would have to at least investigate to find out there was no bullets or gunpowder anywhere. I also think one of the first things they would do is look to see if he was shot being that the victim was shot back in 1993 and this time was screaming "I've been shot again" before he fell down.
Click to expand...

So in every scenario investigations should always be done to rule out things that are not suspected or evideneced at the scene?
 
TruthByDecree said:
Yeah well the victim and most of the evidence didn't spontaneously combust back in 93 either so... yeah. figure that one out too. I also think this time around they should have investigated the body before it was moved to the cemetery.
Click to expand...

I hope you aren't now trying to claim that 10,000 gallons of jet fuel spraying all over the place in a big explosion won't set things on fire...
 
Brainache said:
I hope you aren't now trying to claim that 10,000 gallons of jet fuel spraying all over the place in a big explosion won't set things on fire...
Click to expand...

No I'm trying to point out how some people come up with stupid dumb analogies about people being shot for lack of anything else. Please elaborate on "all over the place" will you? Is that a scientific phrase?
 
TruthByDecree said:
No I'm trying to point out how some people come up with stupid dumb analogies about people being shot for lack of anything else. Please elaborate on "all over the place" will you? Is that a scientific phrase?
Click to expand...

Well if you really need to have something as simple as the phrase "all over the place" explained to you regarding what happens when 10,000 gallons of jet fuel explode after a high speed impact with an office tower, I can't see you ever understanding anything much at all.

Do you think the fuel all stayed together in the shape of a fuel tank?

Do you think there was no plane?

Do you think there was no fuel?

Do you think there was no explosion?

If you really need these things explained, I don't think you are smart enough to understand the explanation.
 
Last edited:
Brainache said:
Well if you really need to have something as simple as the phrase "all over the place" explained to you regarding what happens when 10,000 gallons of jet fuel explode after a high speed impact with an office tower, I can't see you ever understanding anything much at all.

Do you think the fuel all stayed together in the shape of a fuel tank?

Do you think there was no plane?

Do you think there was no fuel?

Do you think there was no explosion?

If you really need these things explained, I don't think you are smart enough to understand the explanation.
Click to expand...

Well maybe I'm not as smart as you. So explain to me exactly just how much of the 10,000 gallons stayed inside the building, and how long it took for it to burn up, and just how such a smart person like you knows exactly.
 
TruthByDecree said:
Well maybe I'm not as smart as you. So explain to me exactly just how much of the 10,000 gallons stayed inside the building, and how long it took for it to burn up, and just how such a smart person like you knows exactly.
Click to expand...

No. You wouldn't believe me anyway, so what's the point? Work it out for yourself. You might learn something.
 
that instead of asking us to do your homework, maybe you should start doing it/ you know, by starting with that 10,000 page report that NIST spent 3 years to produce.
 
Arus808 said:
that instead of asking us to do your homework, maybe you should start doing it/ you know, by starting with that 10,000 page report that NIST spent 3 years to produce.
Click to expand...

You mean the same report that I needed to point out to you in the other thread doesn't explain the collapse of all 110 stories it just speculates on the initiation? When exactly will you be reading it?
 
TruthByDecree said:
You mean the same report that I needed to point out to you in the other thread doesn't explain the collapse of all 110 stories it just speculates on the initiation? When exactly will you be reading it?
Click to expand...

no. that report that EXPLAINS with EVDIENCE what caused the collapse initiation.

now care to explain to us why you think that the collapse needs to be explained? or have you never fell in your entire life? Im sure as a baby you bruised your little touche millions of times, when you tried to learn to walk.

You know that force called gravity? you know the force that keeps your feet on the ground?

Care to explain how you can stop gravity? Cause that's what caused the buildings to collapse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom