As a statement, that was based on past experience with the claim, it no longer holds that I can always detect medical information at any time and it requires no effort from me. I have since had other experience that indicates otherwise. I now know that there are cases where I don't detect one way or the other or that it takes very long time to form a perception, and I do know that it does require effort! It is a learning process. My statements can only be based on past experiences. If I had never encountered not being able to form a perception and it taking no effort, then how could I then argue otherwise? But I now can.
Oh, stop with the ******** already. You have
zero credibility. The statement FromDownUnder quoted, "I can always detect medical information at any time and it requires no effort from me" was a lie the moment you wrote it.
The reliability of your claim has repeatedly waffled ever since you arrived on this planet. The main reason the IIG test took two years to put together is because you wanted to be able to pass on people and because you claimed that your perceptions were not reliable. You claimed to be able to detect a vasectomy then later said you tried and couldn't detect vasectomies in anyone else. You claimed to be able to read people in photos and then after failing to do so, started with the oft-repeated "it's not my strongest claim." Clearly this is in direct contradiction to the statement you now claim to retract.
You have made a wide variety of
completely bizarre claims that show a tenuous grasp on reality. Many of them have been clearly debunked, such as your imaginary conversations with historical figures. Well, I guess they are not debunked if these historical figures after dying choose to believe accounts of their lives as seen in popular fiction.
You have also subjected yourself to
several basic tests and repeatedly failed them or failed to complete them. Every single instance where your claims have been subjected to rudimentary controls or witnesses, you have failed miserably. The IIG test was just the most public and best controlled
failure.
The only reason you are here is because you believe this to be the best source for your
narcissistic supply. Infamy is just as good as fame. Negative attention is just as good as positive attention.
You said up front that you expected to fail the IIG test. When your delusion was shattered, you tried to make excuses and became vindictive. Now that you're back to feeling comfortable in your delusions, you're changing things just enough in an effort to get people to continue to engage you. You know deep down it's all a bunch of nonsense, but you can't make yourself stop.
We're skeptics here, which means we think critically. You no longer present anything of interest. We have all the evidence we need to show that your claims are a bunch of nonsense. Even the most forgiving of critical thinkers can see that there is no chance in hell of
you changing your beliefs in any meaningful way, which is what many people had hoped. Alas, you are typical of the woos we encounter in that you do not listen to reason.
The only difference between you and other woos is you most likely have a mental disorder that compels to return time and time again whereas most woos know when to slink away quietly into the night.
