The Unofficial Election 2016 Results Thread PLEASE

BBC running their live update page here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/election-us-2016-37899679

and they have this charming tale of the unfortunate man who was beaten up at the Trump rally earlier in the week:



I'm getting the impression that in Republican speak 'voter fraud' = 'voted for the Democratic Party'.


That is exactly what it means for them. It's why they pursue voter disenfranchisement. The wrong people might vote for the wrong party!
 
Entirely unsurprising.

Hispanics are doing exactly what someone like me would expect them to do. They're voting their race. They're voting for their group interest.

A very high percentage of them are the children of illegals, or at least related to illegals. Regardless of that, they see Mexicans, not White Americans, as their countrymen.

They want the gates held open for more of their folk to get in, gain more power, change the culture here, and ultimately conquer this nation.

Trump dared to speak on behalf of the interests of actual Americans, one of which is the desire to not be swamped/replaced/displaced/dispossessed/made irrelevant by high birth rate outsiders who come in against our will. Sometimes they get the cooperation of our elites who want to drive down wages and have their gardeners and maids, and sometimes they do it regardless of that, but none of it is legitimate.

Whether Trump wins or loses, we are getting closer to ethnic balkanization and more undeniable, open racial strife.

How long until liberals admit that the dream of a post-racial society just simply isn't happening, ever?

20 years from now you're going to see incredible levels of interracial hostility in Europe and the United States.

Homogeneity was the way to avoid this.

Homogeneity by law was tried in Germany is the 1930's. Did'nt work out so well, did it?
 
Homogeneity by law was tried in Germany is the 1930's. Did'nt work out so well, did it?

I would say that having non-Germans in Germany didn't work out very well, did it?

It ultimately ended up tearing the country apart. It is about to again.
 
I would say that having non-Germans in Germany didn't work out very well, did it?

It ultimately ended up tearing the country apart. It is about to again.

No it isn't, independently of what floating turds on the internet might be saying.

Germany is a great place to live, open to both immigrants and refugees. The only people I've seen germans being openly hostile to were their own diminute cohort of neo-nazis (which most would happily exchange for more refugees).

You'll see the Independent Republic of California before you see German society breaking itself apart because of racism.
 
I'm still nervous as hell though, you can always say you feel confident, but his **** is nerve racking.

At least the most important states are mainly in the east. Imagine if we had to wait for the results from Hawaii to come in.

Steve S
 
How long until liberals admit that the dream of a post-racial society just simply isn't happening, ever?

20 years from now you're going to see incredible levels of interracial hostility in Europe and the United States.
.
Nah, us interracials aren't hostile. Also, it'll be post racial soon enough what with the mixing.
 
Nevada dismissed Trump's suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
 
Nah, us interracials aren't hostile. Also, it'll be post racial soon enough what with the mixing.
I doubt that'll change anything. The people who currently seize on racial divides for their othering will just pick some other cultural difference to project blame for their woes onto. People are people everywhere, including people who'll disagree.
 
I would say that having non-Germans in Germany didn't work out very well, did it?
Given that many of the people they picked on were Germans, I'd say you're mistaken.

The problem with your thesis is that the divisions don't stop at ethnic groups. There is no "white race" that cares about "whites" and wants what is in the interest of "whites". The "white race" is a multitude of different groups, many of which overlap, some of which don't. And so is every other ethnicity - and with overlap between ethnicities that is often as big or bigger than the overlap between groups within the ethnicity. A white New Yorker may well have more in common and feel more at home culturally with a black New Yorker as compared to a white Mississippian.

You cannot ever get rid of inter-group strife; at least not until you are a nation of one individual who gets along just fine with himself. Good luck with that.
 
Entirely unsurprising.

Hispanics are doing exactly what someone like me would expect them to do. They're voting their race. They're voting for their group interest.

A very high percentage of them are the children of illegals, or at least related to illegals. Regardless of that, they see Mexicans, not White Americans, as their countrymen.

They want the gates held open for more of their folk to get in, gain more power, change the culture here, and ultimately conquer this nation.

Trump dared to speak on behalf of the interests of actual Americans, one of which is the desire to not be swamped/replaced/displaced/dispossessed/made irrelevant by high birth rate outsiders who come in against our will. Sometimes they get the cooperation of our elites who want to drive down wages and have their gardeners and maids, and sometimes they do it regardless of that, but none of it is legitimate.

Whether Trump wins or loses, we are getting closer to ethnic balkanization and more undeniable, open racial strife.

How long until liberals admit that the dream of a post-racial society just simply isn't happening, ever?

20 years from now you're going to see incredible levels of interracial hostility in Europe and the United States.

Homogeneity was the way to avoid this.


Are you on the Politics and Sociology Confederacy Facebook group? If you're not already there, you might find dozens of soulmates there.
 

Back
Top Bottom