The Twin Towers at free fall speed

<cough><cough><********><cough><cough>

Please, pretty please mr engineer just post one video of thermite/thermate/nanothermite capable of cutting steel beams horizontally or obliquely.

It should be easy with your "experience."

Pretty please. I"m not asking for much.

BTW: it is TRUTH. I'm not sure what Thuth is...
 
Last edited:
The information that I have been privy to has damned the American govts stance and could most likely influence the British studies just started - being a commonwealth and having close ties with British Aerospace we are now setting up a similar program with them over the next few months.


I tried responding to this once, but it's not easy trying to guess which one will survive after the rest of the spammed copies are moderated out of existence :rolleyes: ... so I'll try again.

Welcome to the Forum.

The probability of thermite being involved in the destruction of the WTC is zero.

You claim above to have evidence of some kind. Can we see it, or is this just a bluff?
 
I am an engineer - 23 years - welding and metallurgist specialist - TIG, Plasma weld and cut and submerged arc. - currently 18 months R&D with DSTO ( Defense Australia) projects specifically in Explosive welding research and chemical related studies. ( which i have also had some input into)
Thermite and thermate grades of media are consistent with the results myself and my colleagues have researched relating to the other scientific communities explaining the high probability that a thermite type of compound was used in the WTC events - the 911 events were included in our investigations with structural simulations and such - the findings are currently being filed with the Australian Govt under the 'preventative security acts' currently being examined in an endeavour to realise the past and future national security risks relating to further involvements and decisions made that place the Aust govt in a liable situation based on the events that have taken place over the last decade.
The information that I have been privy to has damned the American govts stance and could most likely influence the British studies just started - being a commonwealth and having close ties with British Aerospace we are now setting up a similar program with them over the next few months.

Amazingly thermite family of compounds are actually quite versatile the hardest understandings we had were in the various results we obtained exploring all the possible methods and applications they could be found to work in - (Nuclear has nothing on thermite it is so much more versatile and mobile)

I am sure in the near future some further light will become apparent with regard to the questions that have been raised for so long - mind you we also had a head start - the French gave us a lot of help at the beginning and we are very excited about putting to rest some of these issues.

Of the several times this identical text was posted in various threads, I have kept this one in this thread as the posting closest to being on topic, since the prior discussion does involve structural collapse dynamics of WTC buildings and the possibility of demolition or thermite. Responses to the same post on other threads, that were moved to AAH, may be reposted to this thread if they are on-topic, civil, and all that other good stuff the MA requires.

quest 4 thuth, please do not post the same post to multiple threads. That is considered spamming the forum, which is not permitted under Rule 6 of your Member Agreement.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Myriad

Yeah, I'm sure the first stop for a serious researcher after filing for government information is... JREF's 9/11 CT subforum. :rolleyes:

But in spite of this doubt, I do admit that I harbor a small but real hope that a legitimate metallurgist would show up. Because I've always wanted to ask one this question: How did the thermite manage to leave no signs of use on the steel? I mean, take a look at core column # 603 (C-80) from the North Tower. It spanned floors 95 to 92. No question it had to be involved in the "controlled demolition" since it was in the collapse initiation zone, yet, photographs of it really makes it look like it was subject to mechanical stress, not thermite. And then there's column 801 (C-88a) from the South Tower. I'm just damn curious to know how thermite affected columns didn't show signs of thermite use.

Cue standard dodge about "not all steel recovered"... which is rendered irrelevant by Bazant; collapse zone steel was. And when that's pointed out, cue standard dodges about Bazant... man, it's like we can all replace ourselves here with replybots, the script is so set...
 
tell me what u want to know


After this second marvel of a post, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you didn't write your silly but markedly less juvenile first one, but rather only copied it, believing blindly that the individual who wrote it was telling the truth.

I told you what I want to know. You claim to have evidence. Let's see it. Pretty easy to figure out. I think you're lying.
 
You claim above to have evidence of some kind. Can we see it, or is this just a bluff?

tell me what u want to know

I told you what I want to know. You claim to have evidence. Let's see it. Pretty easy to figure out. I think you're lying.

Sorry first timer - not realised

Asked twice, didn't answer twice. We're still waiting...
1sm051hmph.gif
 
I am an engineer - ...

(Nuclear has nothing on thermite it is so much more versatile and mobile)
...

An engineer?

Thermite is versatile, there is 645,000,000 MJ/kg in a hydrogen fusion (nuke), only 88,250,000 MJ/kg in Uranium nuke, and the we have the very versatile thermite reaction.

Thermite has 4.00 MJ/kg, coming in 22,063,500 times less energy per kg.

Any clues why thermite is NOT used to power our cities or cars? Cause even oil has ten times the energy.

plastics have more energy.

Great engineering... Wait, what about using thermite instead of nuke on our ICBMs! 23 years as an engineer, you don't say... and you support thermite in the WTC destruction? Your logic is... well... very special.

Jet fuel beats thermite; jet fuel has 42.8 MJ/kg, why are we going to use the feeble heat energy of thermite when jet fuel beats it by an order of magnitude (engineers use this term).

Wood has 18 MJ/kg and we can 4.5 times less wooden desks than thermite and burn up a building, or the same weight of desks as thermite and have 4.5 times more energy! Wowzer!

What else is better than thermite? Chocolate chip cookies have 8 times the energy. Plastics, 10 times the energy.
No one would use Thermite, the energy dud.

Fires destroyed the WTC, not thermite. Office fires have more energy than thermite, and they were started jet fuel equal to 315 tons of TNT in heat energy, remember 10 times the energy of thermite. (order of magnitude)

Welcome new thermite engineer.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to the forum!

With the (I assume) misspelling in your user name and this post, may I ask if English is your first language?



Whatever the case, I see no good coming from this.
The usual depiction of Thuth was as a baboon or an Ibis and the reason for involving the ibis in the depiction of Thuth , as mentioned in one of the old myths , is that Ra commanded Thuth , the Ibis to be his messenger who helps him in the weary burdens of mankind and the daily tiring journey . Moreover , the ancient Egyptians prohibited sacrificing the Ibises and regarded it as a sacred bird . The Ibises were presented as sacrifice for Thuth and there is a large necropolis that was dedicated to these mummified ibises nearby Menia or the ancient Hermopolis . On the wall paintings in the Temple of Ramsses II , Thuth is depicted as baboon worshipping the sun god .
 
Last edited:
tell me what u want to know

PRetty please mr "engineer" can you show me thermite/thermate/nanothermite/godzilla poo cutting through steel beams horizontally or obliquely.

And

Can you show me how you can possibly time multiple cuts on multiple beams to happen at the same time (give or take a few seconds)

It should be easy.
 
Repost (with a slight modification regarding previous posts):

So you're posting here while using a name that means that you're on a quest to find the Egyptian god of science? Good luck with that.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom