The Twin Towers at free fall speed

The probability of thermite being involved in the destruction of the WTC is zero.

You claim above to have evidence of some kind. Can we see it, or is this just a bluff?
tell me what u want to know
...How did the thermite manage to leave no signs of use on the steel?...
... I'm just damn curious to know how thermite affected columns didn't show signs of thermite use.
I told you what I want to know. You claim to have evidence. Let's see it. Pretty easy to figure out. I think you're lying.
Sorry first timer - not realised

Lets see the "findings"

show your work
Time to stop viewing and start typing. Your papers please?
PRetty please mr "engineer" can you show me thermite/thermate/nanothermite/godzilla poo cutting through steel beams horizontally or obliquely.

And

Can you show me how you can possibly time multiple cuts on multiple beams to happen at the same time (give or take a few seconds)
23 years of study in these fields and other trades also- am 44 yo


Six direct requests for him to give the evidence behind his claim... and yet, he's still not presented it.
xo4pa8.gif


Folks: We have someone with no evidence. If he'd had it, he'd have posted at least a summary by now. Unless he produces something, it's time to put him on ignore.
 
Yes, I just noticed the google/babel sounding verbiage on the other thread. My bad.

Anyhow, about the 'free fall speed' (sic)...
 
I can only respond to genuine questions - and listen to opinions as part of our curriculum.
aggravating comments - i am not interested in responding to.
 
I can only respond to genuine questions - and listen to opinions as part of our curriculum.
aggravating comments - i am not interested in responding to.

You posted this:
Thermite and thermate grades of media are consistent with the results myself and my colleagues have researched relating to the other scientific communities explaining the high probability that a thermite type of compound was used in the WTC events...

You were asked this:
You claim above to have evidence of some kind. Can we see it, or is this just a bluff?

And after 14 posts in this forum, you've yet to present even a summary of the evidence you claim to hold. You were given a direct and reasonable request: Please post your evidence. I reiterate that request. Please post your evidence. A summary of your findings, a key piece of your study... anything.
 
wow, quest for thuth, I'm beginning to think these folks are, shall we say, dubious of your claims. You obviously have seen solid evidence that the towers were brought down by CD (otherwise why would you think they were? That would be just silly, no?)

Perhaps now is the time to share that evidence so that we may begin marching in the streets demanding another investigation with our truther brothers.
 
... the findings are currently being filed with the Australian Govt under the 'preventative security acts'


A few minutes googling comes up with nothing called the preventative security acts for Australia. Can you point to the law?

Thanks
 
questions

g'day - quite a few questions - it is 1.30 am here - but questions i can answer later - and if genuine opinions are available please comment.
thanks - your input is appreciated.
 
Oh great. Another "the evidence is being gathered and being brought to the proper authorities. Any day now the lid is going to blow off this thing!" thread.

Wake me up when the revolution starts.
 
g'day - quite a few questions - it is 1.30 am here - but questions i can answer later - and if genuine opinions are available please comment.
thanks - your input is appreciated.

Please tell us what the 'preventative security acts' is/are?


(or are you someone that never answers questions, i.e. a Troll?)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom