The TruthSeeker1234 $1000.00 Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hell 1000 bucks for a few posts on a message board? I'll pretend that the positive case is "Monkeys ate the World Trade Center."

Let's go!
 
Abbyas said:
Hell 1000 bucks for a few posts on a message board? I'll pretend that the positive case is "Monkeys ate the World Trade Center."

Let's go!
Click to expand...

Damn you Abby! You pledged to the NWO not to talk about that! :monkey:
 
Abbyas said:
Hell 1000 bucks for a few posts on a message board? I'll pretend that the positive case is "Monkeys ate the World Trade Center."

Let's go!
Click to expand...

I admire your optimism but I doubt you will see dollar one from TruthSeeker. The contract is extremely lopsided. Hence it is unenforcible. You'd have to rely on his word of honor.

Good luck with that.
 
I see that the monetary negotiations for attention whores is a little different.

This reminds me of a knock-knock joke. Go ahead and start...
 
I admire your optimism but I doubt you will see dollar one from TruthSeeker. The contract is extremely lopsided. Hence it is unenforcible. You'd have to rely on his word of honor.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know.

But, hey, I'll sweeten the deal! After every reply you make, I'll write "Dang, that guy is too smart for me. Boy, his mother must be very proud to have such an erudite son. I know I'm so happy to share the same internet space. Me and my JREF buddies are so stupid. Stupid!"
 
Is completion of the debate when you stop posting in the thread? 'cause that's usually after a message or two.

Also in the moderated thread, is the edit button disabled?
 
kevin said:
Is completion of the debate when you stop posting in the thread? 'cause that's usually after a message or two.

Also in the moderated thread, is the edit button disabled?
Click to expand...

oh yeah, and do you not start the actual debate until the $100 arrives. How will you be paying? Check, credit card or paypal?

And to you $ means US dollars, not pesos?
 
Here's a plan: post any point that you think means the towers fell by other means, and we'll rebuke it right here! We, I, same difference. I'll do that for free!
 
Abbyas said:
Hell 1000 bucks for a few posts on a message board? I'll pretend that the positive case is "Monkeys ate the World Trade Center."

Let's go!
Click to expand...
megal2.jpg
 
KingMerv00 said:
Looking at the format of your offer, it does not look like an enforcible contract. For a contract to be legally binding you must receive compensation for your money. What exactly are you getting out of this?
Click to expand...

Consideration, for purposes of contract law, need not be monetary. He's getting something out of it - which is getting the attention he craves.

[That said, it still is not an enforceable contract in its present form, but that can be dealt with in due course. Highly unlikely that it will ever come to pass, since BS1234 has no intention of ever debating anyone in a legitimate fashion and has never demonstrated any ability to do so and has never demonstrated any willingness to do so beyond starting scads of threads and then ignoring everything that is posted in them when he is proven incompetent and uneducated time and time again. So, I doubt that this one will come to anything either.]
 
Last edited:
LashL said:
Consideration, for purposes of contract law, need not be monetary. He's getting something out of it - which is getting the attention he craves.

[That said, it still is not an enforceable contract in its present form, but that can be dealt with in due course. Highly unlikely that it will ever come to pass, since BS1234 has no intention of ever debating anyone in a legitimate fashion and has never demonstrated any ability to do so and has never demonstrated any willingness to do so beyond starting scads of threads and then ignoring everything that is posted in them when he is proven incompetent and uneducated time and time again. So, I doubt that this one will come to anything either.]
Click to expand...

I know that consideration need not be monetary. The attention he would receive is not worth anywhere near $1000, therefore it is unenforcible.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
I offer $1000.00 to anyone who will debate me, one on one, on a closed thread, and start the thread with the positive case for the impact/fire hypothesis. Resolved: WTC1,2, and 7 came down due to impact damage and fire.

Debate according to Arkan's rules. $100 up front (i.e. upon your having opened the thread made the first post being made), $900.00 balance paid upon completion of the debate.

OK, it's not the $1,000,000.00 challenge, but at least it's physically possible for someone to have an online debate, unlike the JREF $1,000,000.00 challenge.

How about it, anyone want my money?
Click to expand...
For F&*CKS sake, man. Debate just doesn't work this way.

Go run for office or something.
 
A "skeptic" does not make claims; he analyzes the claims of others and decides whether or not he is personally convinced by them.

You and your friends have yet to convince me. It would appear some others here feel the same way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom