The TruthSeeker1234 $1000.00 Challenge

[TruthSeeker1234]

I offer $1000.00 to anyone who will debate me, one on one, on a closed thread, and start the thread with the positive case for the impact/fire hypothesis. Resolved: WTC1,2, and 7 came down due to impact damage and fire.

Debate according to Arkan's rules. $100 up front (i.e. upon your having opened the thread made the first post being made), $900.00 balance paid upon completion of the debate.

OK, it's not the $1,000,000.00 challenge, but at least it's physically possible for someone to have an online debate, unlike the JREF $1,000,000.00 challenge.

How about it, anyone want my money?

 

[Abbyas]

Hell, yes.

 

[KingMerv00]

So there is no requirement of "victory"? You will just pay us $1000 for debating with you?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

your willing to give up 1000 dollars rather than admit your point of view is contrary to the status quo and argue your case first?

you, sir, need to re-evaluate your priorities

 

[Bell]

I offer $1000.00 to anyone who will debate me, one on one, on a closed thread, and start the thread with the positive case for the impact/fire hypothesis. Resolved: WTC1,2, and 7 came down due to impact damage and fire.

Debate according to Arkan's rules. $100 up front, $900.00 balance paid upon completion of the debate.

OK, it's not the $1,000,000.00 challenge, but at least it's physically possible for someone to have an online debate, unlike the JREF $1,000,000.00 challenge.

How about it, anyone want my money?

Don't we have like half a dozen threads about this allready? Why start a new thread? And when did money came into play? Trying to dodge your way out of this? Start your doggam debat thread allready!

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

OK, go ahead. When the thread appears and you have posted the postive case, you many contact me, and I'll send the $100.00 and begin working on my answer.

 

[WildCat]

OK, go ahead. When the thread appears and you have posted the postive case, you many contact me, and I'll send the $100.00 and begin working on my answer.

Not likely.

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

And when did money came into play?

at 4:45, when I realized that no one is willing to actually defend the official story.

 

[Ducky]

once again you tell someone else to start the debate.

Stop posturing. YOU start the debate. Whether you go first or second is irrelevant, unless all you want to do is attack another argument without evidence. You do have evidence, right? What's the problem?

Coward.

 

[WildCat]

at 4:45, when I realized that no one is willing to actually defend the official story.

You are delusional.

 

[Dog Town]

Wowee,....considering how easy it is to find people that don't like you, or your views! You are now gonna pay? Hell folks, sounds like a gravy( no punn) train. Hope he has deep pockets!

 

[defaultdotxbe]

theres my defense of the official story, debunk at your leisure

 

[Bell]

You are delusional.

But for ones he answered a direct question.

 

[WildCat]

So TS1234, have you figured out what a pyroclastic flow is and why it is gutbusting funny to see someone claim one was produced by the WTC collapses?

 

[WildCat]

But for ones he answered a direct question.

You're right! And it only took him 308 posts to do so!

 

[Dog Town]

Dude...how are you at three card monty? Cuz I would love to learn...

 

[Dave1001]

Don't give them your money for this. I'm sure you have better uses for it than this stuff.

 

[Mancman]

OK, go ahead. When the thread appears and you have posted the postive case, you many contact me, and I'll send the $100.00 and begin working on my answer.

I'll do it, but you'll have to wait a few weeks, I've just given all my bank details to a lovely Nigerian fella who has handpicked me (via email) to help move a large sum of unclaimed cash into a British bank account. Aren't I lucky? Once this is out of the way we can get down to business.

 

[KingMerv00]

I offer $1000.00 to anyone who will debate me, one on one, on a closed thread, and start the thread with the positive case for the impact/fire hypothesis. Resolved: WTC1,2, and 7 came down due to impact damage and fire.

Debate according to Arkan's rules. $100 up front, $900.00 balance paid upon completion of the debate.

OK, it's not the $1,000,000.00 challenge, but at least it's physically possible for someone to have an online debate, unlike the JREF $1,000,000.00 challenge.

How about it, anyone want my money?

Looking at the format of your offer, it does not look like an enforcible contract. For a contract to be legally binding you must receive compensation for your money. What exactly are you getting out of this?

 

[Mancman]

Looking at the format of your offer, it does not look like an enforcible contract. For a contract to be legally binding you must receive compensation for your money. What exactly are you getting out of this?

Perhaps he's a masochist, and wants to pay for a brutal beating? (In internet debate terms)