heydarian saeed
Graduate Poster
...
From the point of view of revising and reforming divine religions, "Qur'an" refers to "covenant books". (Old Testament and New Testament) This relationship is similar to the relationship between the New Testament and the ancient Jewish scriptures. Therefore, it might be better to say that the Qur'an is similar to the "Third and Modern Testament of Religions".
And it has "updated" the scriptures of all divine religions.
For those who do not accept the God of the Old Testament and the New Testament, the message of the Third and Modern Testament, i.e. the Quran, will not be much of a consolation for them. My opinion in this regard is that "the power of faith and love" is superior to "reason" if used correctly.
The power of faith, while describing the system of creation in the best way, keeps people away from doubt. and brings certainty. And therefore, his opinion is more correct and acceptable than other schools of thought.
"Existential philosophy" is a mixture of "faith-love and reason". None of the content of this philosophy is outside the universe. Originality exists. And the rest of the issues revolve around the "authenticity of existence".
The main basis of the logic of the Quran is the "Philosophy of Existential Authenticity". Although he has examined the rest of the philosophical schools in different verses. and has presented his own opinion.
In the Qur'an, he only talked about "the universe and existence". There is no mention of the supernatural in the Quran. Of course This does not necessarily mean a denial of the supernatural. Rather, he wants to be completely rational and up-to-date. And not unreasonable.
Those who regularly say where are the scientific articles of the Quran? and not produced. They are unaware of the fact that many of the things they believe do not have any scientific articles. And they have not been tested in the laboratory! Are the social-economical-historical-geographical-images of telescopes from space like James Webb's latest photo from 13 billion years ago in space!! Do these have scientific articles? And they have not been tested in the laboratory! No. So how do you accept these contents? And do you believe? If you read Einstein's biography, you will see that many of Einstein's ideas were fanciful. And some of them were discovered. And it was published as a scientific article. And some of them have not been discovered yet. Although the content of the modern science of the Qur'an cannot be compared to Einstein, it can be used as an example. Of which many Quranic contents have been discovered. And many of them are still not answered by science and technology. So Denying the Qur'an and the contents of modern science of the Qur'an requires the denial of modern science. And insisting on this approach is unwise and rejected.
Dear Pixel, he asked me to present a scientific article on the Qur'an. Or a claim from the Qur'an for which science still has no answer. I stated 3 claims of God in the Quran. Science still has no answer. At the beginning of the creation of the universe, where did the "single" come from? And who brought it? Inanimate matter became alive by what mechanism? And who made the inanimate matter alive? Who or what mechanism will recreate the universe after its destruction? God has answered all three claims in the Quran. And he said: "I have done it." Pixel's answer to these three claims is very reasonable. "Science still doesn't have an answer. But I'm waiting for science to answer." Despite my faith in God and the certainty that God's claims in the Qur'an are completely correct for these three issues. But I liked Pixel's answer. I will wait too. I suggest to all of you to follow this approach instead of denying the Qur'anic content and God's claim for no reason.I personally accept the protest and rebellion approach. And I believe that many scientific advances have been due to doubt and protest. If we don't doubt or protest about something, we have closed the way to human discoveries. And this approach is not wise and logical. But ... protest and rebellion against obvious, documented and valid issues are rejected. And insisting on this approach is due to ignorance and misunderstanding.
Wishing you health and success to all of you, dear friends, who had the patience for this topic and listened to all the conversations. And I have special thanks to those who doubted and objected to my words. And they saw my answers. and they heard.
Thank you all
From the point of view of revising and reforming divine religions, "Qur'an" refers to "covenant books". (Old Testament and New Testament) This relationship is similar to the relationship between the New Testament and the ancient Jewish scriptures. Therefore, it might be better to say that the Qur'an is similar to the "Third and Modern Testament of Religions".
And it has "updated" the scriptures of all divine religions.
For those who do not accept the God of the Old Testament and the New Testament, the message of the Third and Modern Testament, i.e. the Quran, will not be much of a consolation for them. My opinion in this regard is that "the power of faith and love" is superior to "reason" if used correctly.
The power of faith, while describing the system of creation in the best way, keeps people away from doubt. and brings certainty. And therefore, his opinion is more correct and acceptable than other schools of thought.
"Existential philosophy" is a mixture of "faith-love and reason". None of the content of this philosophy is outside the universe. Originality exists. And the rest of the issues revolve around the "authenticity of existence".
The main basis of the logic of the Quran is the "Philosophy of Existential Authenticity". Although he has examined the rest of the philosophical schools in different verses. and has presented his own opinion.
In the Qur'an, he only talked about "the universe and existence". There is no mention of the supernatural in the Quran. Of course This does not necessarily mean a denial of the supernatural. Rather, he wants to be completely rational and up-to-date. And not unreasonable.
Those who regularly say where are the scientific articles of the Quran? and not produced. They are unaware of the fact that many of the things they believe do not have any scientific articles. And they have not been tested in the laboratory! Are the social-economical-historical-geographical-images of telescopes from space like James Webb's latest photo from 13 billion years ago in space!! Do these have scientific articles? And they have not been tested in the laboratory! No. So how do you accept these contents? And do you believe? If you read Einstein's biography, you will see that many of Einstein's ideas were fanciful. And some of them were discovered. And it was published as a scientific article. And some of them have not been discovered yet. Although the content of the modern science of the Qur'an cannot be compared to Einstein, it can be used as an example. Of which many Quranic contents have been discovered. And many of them are still not answered by science and technology. So Denying the Qur'an and the contents of modern science of the Qur'an requires the denial of modern science. And insisting on this approach is unwise and rejected.
Dear Pixel, he asked me to present a scientific article on the Qur'an. Or a claim from the Qur'an for which science still has no answer. I stated 3 claims of God in the Quran. Science still has no answer. At the beginning of the creation of the universe, where did the "single" come from? And who brought it? Inanimate matter became alive by what mechanism? And who made the inanimate matter alive? Who or what mechanism will recreate the universe after its destruction? God has answered all three claims in the Quran. And he said: "I have done it." Pixel's answer to these three claims is very reasonable. "Science still doesn't have an answer. But I'm waiting for science to answer." Despite my faith in God and the certainty that God's claims in the Qur'an are completely correct for these three issues. But I liked Pixel's answer. I will wait too. I suggest to all of you to follow this approach instead of denying the Qur'anic content and God's claim for no reason.I personally accept the protest and rebellion approach. And I believe that many scientific advances have been due to doubt and protest. If we don't doubt or protest about something, we have closed the way to human discoveries. And this approach is not wise and logical. But ... protest and rebellion against obvious, documented and valid issues are rejected. And insisting on this approach is due to ignorance and misunderstanding.
Wishing you health and success to all of you, dear friends, who had the patience for this topic and listened to all the conversations. And I have special thanks to those who doubted and objected to my words. And they saw my answers. and they heard.
Thank you all
