OK, there is a great deal to say about what you have claimed above. But first I want to say that I am not going spend any time going through each verse, because really what you have done is just claim the exact same changes for every verse. But -
the very first such translation from the very first Google search (i.e. found in less than 2 seconds) says this for your very first sentence -
https://legacy.quran.com/32/7
Sahih International 32:7
"Who perfected everything which He created and began the creation of man from clay."
OK, so what you have done is changed the word “from”, and replaced it with “in”. Or to be more specific – you are copying the Islamic fundamentalist Ijaz preachers who started to make changes like that in the 1970's (or possibly earlier). That is – this idea of changing the words has not come from you … it was already being done by certain Islamic fundamentalist fanatics before you were even born! So you are just believing them and copying them.
But the essential and crucial question is – when did these fundamentalist Ijaz preachers start to change the words like that? Was it before or only AFTER Darwin told the world about evolution in 1859?
I suspect that all of these examples claiming modern science revealed in the Quran, only began to appear AFTER the scientific discoveries had been published, i.e. after everyone had already heard about it.
In other words, if we take evolution as our example – what the Ijaz fundamentalists are doing (and what you Heydarian are believing and copying from them), is that before Darwin told us all about evolution, none of those Islamic writers were saying that the words needed to be changed from “created Man
from mud and clay” to change it to “made Man and started all life
IN wet mud & clay” … they only started to make such changes when by about the 1950's to 1970's it had become clear even to Islam that they could no longer keep denying evolution or any other part of science, so they started to say that the words should be changed from saying that Allah had begun by creating a whole Man out of wet mud-clay, and changed that to claiming that the Quran should be re-interpreted and changed so that it said Allah had started living things IN some wet muddy clay!
The reason why they did that (obviously) is to avoid the fact that every discovery in modern science kept showing that the words, claims & beliefs of the Quran were certainly wrong/untrue. So in the 1970's with a book by a man named Maurice Bucaille (if I remeber his name correctly, and who I have mentioned here before several times), Islamic fundamentalists started to use a new approach called “Ijaz”, whereby they simply claimed the authority to “re-interpret” hundreds of passages of the Quran so that they sounded more as if they were talking about discoveries from modern science ...even so, not a single one of those re-interpreted sentences sounds much at all like modern-science, but at least some of it sounded like it might be a sort-of very vague cryptic mystical description that could be imagined by the faithful believers to be a bit like what has actually been discovered by 20th and 21st century science …
… that's what the Ijaz fundamentalists have been doing since at least that book of the 1970's. And that is what Heydarian has been doing all throughout his every post in this thread, i.e. just repeating and copying what is said in all of that Islamic Ijaz writing.
But apart from the fact that this Ijaz approach is a very obvious attempted fraud from it's very start, it is also so utterly incompetent and scientifically ignorant that it's claims do not work anyway.
For example Heydarian, you have your first sentence above, saying that “Allah created Man in the mud” … but that is NOT what science and evolution says. Humans were not created in any Mud! However, more than that – in science it is far from clear or agreed that the first organisms that could be classified as possibly or probably “living”, formed in any wet clay or mud. On the contrary, one of the more popular scientific models describes how life on Earth may have started deep under the seas in things called “hydrothermal vents”. And on top of that, it also remains possible that the first living organisms may even have been brought to this planet in meteorites, i.e. not having occurred naturally on earth at all. So it's far from clear or settled that life originally began in any wet clay/mud.
Even worse than that – AFAIK, evolution involves certain aspects of random chance such that if nature had taken a slightly different course around 5 to 10 million years ago, our very earliest and most distant ape relatives may never have taken that path of evolving towards humans. That is – evolution may never have progressed beyond the stage of our most primitive small related apes … or in other words – it's partly by accident or random chance that the course of mammalian evolution has ended up producing Homo Sapiens.
Of course what might be an even more obvious explanation for Heydarain and other unscientific theists who's beliefs seemingly cannot progress beyond religious superstitions of the 1st to 7th century, is that if any almighty God actually existed and actually wanted to create humans, then he could have just instantly created them by one his enormous list of unexplained but claimed “Miracles” … no superhuman God such as that described in the Quran (or the Bible) would need to create humans by starting 13.8 billion years ago with the Big Bang, and then hoping that 9 billion years later a planet we now call Earth would form somewhere amongst a trillion, trillion …. trillion other planets, stars and galaxies, and that on this one particular planet after about a further billion years the most primitive living cells would somehow form (how is not explained in the Quran) and would then take a further 3.5 billion years before almost entirely by chance and sheer luck some animals called homo sapiens eventually appeared.
