The supernatural

For the article Supernatural

  • thank you

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I hope my article is reviewed

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am waiting for your opinion, dear ones

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hoping for your success and health

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Status
Not open for further replies.
heydarian, I'd suggest you visit a psychiatrist and a neurologist, and get the insides of your head tested. Nothing to be ashamed of, but your brain seems to be lacking the basic reasoning faculty that all human beings generally take for granted. This whole thread is evidence of your amazing inability to think straight; and this sentence, that forms the crux of that particular post of yours, kind of brings into focus how crippled is your thought process.

This sounds rude, I know, but I'm not saying this to denigrate you. There's clearly something wrong with you. Not because you believe in the childish fairy tales that is Islam, because God knows there are enough adults that harbor absurd beliefs like that. But your total inability to think straight about anything at all, that doesn't seem very normal, not very healthy.

To fall into this kind of error in reasoning is in itself, again, not that much of a rarity, unfortunately. But to continue to be blind to this, even when people point out things of this sort to you repeatedly, that seems to me indication of a mind that is afflicted, and might benefit from treatment.




eta belatedly:

For instance, where you blithely gloss over where Pixel42, whom you claim to respect and whose words you claim to read carefully, tells you you're indulging in "circular thinking". That phrase means something, as you would know if you had even the most fundamental understanding of logic. That you don't have that foundation is not the problem; the problem is your refusal to update your knowledge base despite so many people taking the time and effort to educate you.

Another example, where so many people are clearly pointing out to you that evolution has no purpose. Forget quantum mechanics and whatnot, do you even understand what the word "science" actually means? There are people here who actually know a thing or two about how evolution works; as well a great many who, while not experts, nevertheless are conversant enough to give you a basic outline. When people tell you there is no purpose to evolution, your response is to unthinkingly parrot your internalized belief system and repeat, ad infinitum, and without any kind of support, the circular argument that everything has a purpose, and so must evolution.

Don't you see that you're just spouting whatever random nonsense that comes into your head, without the slightest support in terms of either evidence or logic? Please stop thinking and talking about science or logic, since you clearly know less about either than a child of five might; or else, if you wish to continue with your otherwise laudable effort to compare your native beliefs with what science has to say, then please take the trouble to read up a bit on what you're talking about here (and that you clearly know nothing at all about). Reading people's posts carefully and sincerely and honestly would be a great place for you to start.




*backs away from thread, promising not to post again in this crazy thread, despite knowing, already, that that promise will likely not be kept, but still*

Hello dear and valuable teacher. I really enjoyed reading your message. You reminded me of shocking things. thank you very much. I really did not understand what Dear Pixel meant. I thought they were talking about a causal relationship. And the "circular thinking" that he said, I took the sequence in philosophy. In philosophy, we have the issue of sequence. And in relation to the causality of the sequence is rejected. let's move on. I will not continue this issue anymore. So the circular thinking that Dear Pixel said was meant to be circular thinking to repeat my mistakes. I'm really sorry. I did not understand this reminder instead of them.
You are completely right. I have poor scientific knowledge. I can not correctly state the scientific content of the Qur'an. On the other hand, you are really my teacher scientifically. I really enjoy talking to you. I kiss your face. And the arms of a 5-year-old child inside me are open to learn from you. Tell me. Are these Quranic verses and their scientific contents false? Explain to me. You tell me the main point of his science. I'm ready. My whole being is ready to listen and learn from you. here you are.
I really ask you to help me teach me all the scientific sciences of the Qur'an that I have told you so far. Every single thing I have told you about the Qur'an. And he claims that it is scientific for you to tell the truth. I do not want superstitions and lies. Tell me the essence of the scientific material mentioned in the Qur'an that he claimed. I'm really looking forward to hearing from you. I'm serious. I am ready to learn from you. I accept you. You are my benefactor. I love you all. Tell me the scientific fact of the claims of the Qur'an and God. My mind is tired. But I am always eager to learn science.
Take this message really seriously. I look forward to learning from you. Please clarify my mind again. Please.
Thank you very much.
 
Heydarian, This is what you said about the very long list of references to hell in the quran. You tell us it does not mean what it says.

I say it does mean what it says because Muhammad was trying to scare people into following him by threatening them with hell if they did not.

Hello. I said about the Quran. Not my claim. It is claimed by the Quran. But you make your own personal claim. Like the irrelevant poems you said in the previous message. I have reminded you a lot: say everything you say with a documented document. But you do not seem to want to change your wrong approach. I'm sorry for you. You are caught up in the seemingly true thoughts of the "soul". I said in my previous articles. But you did not seem to read. It is not mandatory.
Just hear from me: "The soul is not separate from the body. It has a material reality. It has a place in the genome of the body. It can never be separated from the body. Until death. After man dies, the soul is out with all the bodily information in it. It goes. It does not return at all. Because the soul does not exist without the body. The soul and the angel are of matter and energy. They are in the material world. What is matter and energy like? The soul and the angel are of matter and energy. Their name - their gender - their shape - their feathers and pillows - their appearance are all nonsense. These are just matter and energy. But ... the purgatory that you believe in. Hear from me what purgatory is: purgatory has no external existence. There is no distance between this world and the hereafter. Purgatory is just a name to understand that we are dead. And we are not in the world. It just means that. Purgatory has no external existence. there is nothing. After human death, there is no soul or purgatory. Our structural particles, which are photons (body and soul that are together and not separate), are encoded. And are only saved after death. There is no other process. There is no soul or purgatory. See what science and reality say? Everything that science and reality says is true. I know that you have never seen this in the Qur'an. Take off your petrified and superstitious glasses to see. These are the words of the Qur'an, not the superstitions that you instill in people. These are not verses of torment for you disbelievers of the 2022 century. It was for the infidels of the seventh century. Done. Why do you weave philosophy? Stop lying and stay up to date, man. Free yourself from superstition." I love you.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving";[1] also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.[2] The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade. Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion.[3] Begging the question is closely related to circular reasoning, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing.[4]

Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions
.

Your (erroneous) belief that evolution has a purpose stems directly from your belief in God. There is no scientific justification for it, in fact science tells us the opposite. So you cannot use the fact that (to you at least) evolution appears purposeful as an argument for the existence of God.

"God exists therefore evolution has a purpose", "Evolution has a purpose therefore God exists" is a textbook example of circular reasoning.
 
Dear friends, have a good weekend. Have a nice holiday. Let go and be free. Relax and have fun. Take care of your health and that of your dear family. Forget all the words of this group temporarily. And don't think about it at all.
I love you all and kiss you. Bye
:)
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

.

Your (erroneous) belief that evolution has a purpose stems directly from your belief in God. There is no scientific justification for it, in fact science tells us the opposite. So you cannot use the fact that (to you at least) evolution appears purposeful as an argument for the existence of God.

"God exists therefore evolution has a purpose", "Evolution has a purpose therefore God exists" is a textbook example of circular reasoning.

Hello my dear and benevolent friend. I said goodbye and left until next week. But at the last moment I saw your message. I officially apologize to you before you speak. I did not mean by circular thinking. And I said that because of this sequence or philosophical cycle. And I was wrong. I see in this message that you are really my master. And you express very well the circular thinking of philosophy. Thank you very much. You are absolutely right. I totally agree with you. But our dear friend Chanakya also said very important and correct things. I completely agree with you two professors. And I'm ready to learn. Thank you again. Good luck.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

.

Your (erroneous) belief that evolution has a purpose stems directly from your belief in God. There is no scientific justification for it, in fact science tells us the opposite. So you cannot use the fact that (to you at least) evolution appears purposeful as an argument for the existence of God.

"God exists therefore evolution has a purpose", "Evolution has a purpose therefore God exists" is a textbook example of circular reasoning.

I just read the site you introduced. He is absolutely right. And sequencing in philosophy is a kind of begging. And it is completely rejected. In fact, we have a common understanding with you in this case. Of course, you meant circular thinking in your previous two messages, in fact, my circular mistakes. That I did not realize. And with the message of my dear friend Chanakya, my mind was clarified. Thank you both very much.
 
Hello. I said about the Quran. Not my claim. It is claimed by the Quran. But you make your own personal claim. Like the irrelevant poems you said in the previous message. I have reminded you a lot: say everything you say with a documented document. But you do not seem to want to change your wrong approach. I'm sorry for you. You are caught up in the seemingly true thoughts of the "soul". I said in my previous articles. But you did not seem to read. It is not mandatory.
Just hear from me: "The soul is not separate from the body. It has a material reality. It has a place in the genome of the body. It can never be separated from the body. Until death. After man dies, the soul is out with all the bodily information in it. It goes. It does not return at all. Because the soul does not exist without the body. The soul and the angel are of matter and energy. They are in the material world. What is matter and energy like? The soul and the angel are of matter and energy. Their name - their gender - their shape - their feathers and pillows - their appearance are all nonsense. These are just matter and energy. But ... the purgatory that you believe in. Hear from me what purgatory is: purgatory has no external existence. There is no distance between this world and the hereafter. Purgatory is just a name to understand that we are dead. And we are not in the world. It just means that. Purgatory has no external existence. there is nothing. After human death, there is no soul or purgatory. Our structural particles, which are photons (body and soul that are together and not separate), are encoded. And are only saved after death. There is no other process. There is no soul or purgatory. See what science and reality say? Everything that science and reality says is true. I know that you have never seen this in the Qur'an. Take off your petrified and superstitious glasses to see. These are the words of the Qur'an, not the superstitions that you instill in people. These are not verses of torment for you disbelievers of the 2022 century. It was for the infidels of the seventh century. Done. Why do you weave philosophy? Stop lying and stay up to date, man. Free yourself from superstition." I love you.

You are starting to irritate me. Firstly everything you have said in yellow is completely wrong, and it is not from the Quran. Secondly of late you have taken to preaching standard Muslim propaganda. Like Muhammad could not have been the author of the Quran because he was illiterate.
That I have covered in my well researched post 2521 in which I point out that the Quran itself refers to the bible many times. I also state Muhammad had the bible read to him, and there is a hadith that says this.
Then you say no one could write a surah like the Quran, which is another piece of standard Muslim propaganda and nonsense. A ten year old could write a surah equal to the unholy Quran. It is poorly written trash, and to suggest it is so profound that nobody but God could have written it is laughable.
 
Last edited:
Hello dear and valuable teacher. I really enjoyed reading your message. You reminded me of shocking things. thank you very much. I really did not understand what Dear Pixel meant. I thought they were talking about a causal relationship. And the "circular thinking" that he said, I took the sequence in philosophy. In philosophy, we have the issue of sequence. And in relation to the causality of the sequence is rejected. let's move on. I will not continue this issue anymore. So the circular thinking that Dear Pixel said was meant to be circular thinking to repeat my mistakes. I'm really sorry. I did not understand this reminder instead of them.
You are completely right. I have poor scientific knowledge. I can not correctly state the scientific content of the Qur'an. On the other hand, you are really my teacher scientifically. I really enjoy talking to you. I kiss your face. And the arms of a 5-year-old child inside me are open to learn from you. Tell me. Are these Quranic verses and their scientific contents false? Explain to me. You tell me the main point of his science. I'm ready. My whole being is ready to listen and learn from you. here you are.
I really ask you to help me teach me all the scientific sciences of the Qur'an that I have told you so far. Every single thing I have told you about the Qur'an. And he claims that it is scientific for you to tell the truth. I do not want superstitions and lies. Tell me the essence of the scientific material mentioned in the Qur'an that he claimed. I'm really looking forward to hearing from you. I'm serious. I am ready to learn from you. I accept you. You are my benefactor. I love you all. Tell me the scientific fact of the claims of the Qur'an and God. My mind is tired. But I am always eager to learn science.
Take this message really seriously. I look forward to learning from you. Please clarify my mind again. Please.
Thank you very much.


Those are pretty words, heydarian, and pretty sentiments, all delivered with an admirably gracious air, and a very admirable reciprocation of asperity with apparent sincerity and humility. It’s exactly the kind of thing that had gotten me to take your side earlier upthread, more than once, and to keep on giving you the benefit of the doubt. But I’m afraid there’s little place for further doubt now, given how this train wreck of a thread has evolved.

You claim, with a beautifully sincere air, that you want to learn from me, from us. And yet all of this huge thread is full of people trying to get you to do just that. In response to which you invariably ignore every single criticism or clarification pointed out to you; or else you twist the words of people to misrepresent them; and then go back to your wild unsupported random preaching.

If you’re serious about wanting to learn, just take at random any two or three consecutive pages of this thread, and honestly and sincerely deal with what people are telling you there. Or else pick any individual poster here --- IanS, for instance, who keeps on spending his time and energy trying to respond to you factually (or Pixel42 for that matter, or just about any of the posters who’ve been contributing substantially here) --- and try to address their recent posts off of the last few pages.

Your talk about wanting to learn things is very sincere-sounding, and very pretty, but I’m afraid your walk doesn’t match it. If you really wish to learn, then what’s stopping you? This huge thread here is full of comments addressing exactly what you’re asking for. You can engage with that whole mass of them, or smaller portions if you wish, any time you want to.




I just read the site you introduced. He is absolutely right. And sequencing in philosophy is a kind of begging. And it is completely rejected. In fact, we have a common understanding with you in this case. Of course, you meant circular thinking in your previous two messages, in fact, my circular mistakes. That I did not realize. And with the message of my dear friend Chanakya, my mind was clarified. Thank you both very much.


I mean, you can't ask for more gracious than that, can you now?! Cheers, heydarian. :thumbsup:

Incidentally, I've no clue about the etymology of that term, but I don't think actual literal "begging" has anything to do with that term. Not that that linguistic issue has anything to do with anything, but still.

Good on you to finally, finally, finally grasp the elementary point that Pixel42 has been so patiently trying to explain to you across so many posts.



So then, do you understand the implications of this exchange of yours with Pixel42? You claimed that evolution is purposeful, as part of your larger claim that evolution has been described/preempted in your Quran --- and that latter, in turn, was part of your central claim that the Quran has preempted a great many scientific discoveries, and that the Quran is divinely inspired and inerrant. Pixel42 challenged you to explain just how it is you conclude that evolution is purposeful, and dissected your responses to show you that your reasoning was circular, and therefore fallacious. As such, that argument of yours fails. Following on that, your views on evolution are shown to be erroneous.

Are you able to clearly acknowledge the above? That that specific argument of yours has been shown to be wrong by Pixel42, and also that that clearly damages your larger argument as well?




And that is how it's been with practically every claim you've made here. Like I said, if you really want to, then, instead of asking for people to keep posting explanations for you, that you then go on to ignore or to misrepresent, you could instead go back and sincerely engage with the posts already made. A great many factual and very painstakingly presented explanations have been posted by people like IanS, as well as by many others, including Pixel42. That you've chosen not to sincerely engage with any of these posts made for your benefit, is something that has stood out in this thread. Why you did that isn't clear, and we've had no option but to see this as disingenuousness. You're free to rectify that, and go back and engage with those posts, any time you want.
 
Hello dear and valuable teacher. I really enjoyed reading your message. You reminded me of shocking things. thank you very much. I really did not understand what Dear Pixel meant. I thought they were talking about a causal relationship. And the "circular thinking" that he said, I took the sequence in philosophy. In philosophy, we have the issue of sequence. And in relation to the causality of the sequence is rejected. let's move on. I will not continue this issue anymore. So the circular thinking that Dear Pixel said was meant to be circular thinking to repeat my mistakes. I'm really sorry. I did not understand this reminder instead of them.

You are completely right. I have poor scientific knowledge. I can not correctly state the scientific content of the Qur'an .

On the other hand, you are really my teacher scientifically. I really enjoy talking to you. I kiss your face. And the arms of a 5-year-old child inside me are open to learn from you. Tell me. Are these Quranic verses and their scientific contents false? Explain to me. You tell me the main point of his science. I'm ready. My whole being is read y to listen and learn from you. here you are.

I really ask you to help me teach me all the scientific sciences of the Qur'an that I have told you so far.

Every single thing I have told you about the Qur'an. And he claims that it is scientific for you to tell the truth. I do not want superstitions and lies. Tell me the essence of the scientific material mentioned in the Qur'an that he claimed. I'm really looking forward to hearing from you.

I'm serious. I am ready to learn from you. I accept you. You are my benefactor. I love you all. Tell me the scientific fact of the claims of the Qur'an and God. My mind is tired. But I am always eager to learn science.
Take this message really seriously. I look forward to learning from you. Please clarify my mind again. Please.
Thank you very much.


In your post above you are repeatedly asking Chanakya (and maybe asking others here) to help teach you about science, because you also said right at the start that you “have poor scientific knowledge".... But every time you repeated that request, you added a specific rule which you insist that Chanakya must follow! You asked him to teach you only about what you claim to be words of science IN THE QURAN!

… in other words you are insisting that your science teacher must only teach you that the Quran contains all the scientific beliefs that you have already claimed here!

That would not be teaching you any real science. That would be someone instructed by you, to teach only that the Quran contains modern science!

But of course as everyone here knows, and as all of published science shows, the Quran contains no such scientific descriptions whatsoever. None. Not a single one. Whereas you insist that if anyone tries to teach you about science then your rule is that they must always use the Quran! … and they must only say that words like “sky” and “lights” and “mud” mean quantum physics and evolution etc.

I'm sorry to point this out to you, but everyone here can see that those sort of requests from you are simply dishonest.

If you truly wanted to know whether or not the Quran contains any description of (just for example) human evolution, then you would look at published research papers on human evolution, or more simply just get a few books on human evolution from authors who are genuine independent research scientists, and see if you can find anywhere in any of those papers or books where any actual expert scientist says that evolution was described in the Quran 1300 years before Darwin … can you find any books or papers or real scientists saying that? … the answer is, No! …. No, there are no real papers, books or scientists claiming anything remotely like that …

… the only people who claim, as you do, that the Quran does actually describe evolution (or quantum theory, or relativity, or neutron stars, or black holes etc.), are Islamic religious fundamentalists on the Internet!
 
Last edited:
STOP THIS THREAD NOW !

Lets turn it into a competition to write a surah like the Quran.

Heydarian says it cannot be done, because the Quran says so. He said it is so profound it must be a message from God. Lets prove him wrong and write surahs like the Quran.
I already posted one at post 2520 but that was satirical. I can do a serious attempt too.

I challenge the forum members to produce a surah of their own.

I like this idea, but I think it needs some qualification.
Muslim zealots often claim that the surahs of the Qur'an are such that no-one else could produce anything similar. However, I have never seen any details of exactly what the qualities of these verses are, that are supposedly so great.
If heydarian was able to state what elements of these verses are so impressive, it might help. Is it the use of simile or metaphor? Descriptive language? Use of poetic devices such as alliteration or assonance? Rhythm? The expression of ideas previously unknown and unknowable? What, exactly, is so great about the surahs?
If we knew that, it would add credence to this claim, and also better define the parameters of any attempts to write our own comparable verses.
 
I like this idea, but I think it needs some qualification.
Muslim zealots often claim that the surahs of the Qur'an are such that no-one else could produce anything similar. However, I have never seen any details of exactly what the qualities of these verses are, that are supposedly so great.
If heydarian was able to state what elements of these verses are so impressive, it might help. Is it the use of simile or metaphor? Descriptive language? Use of poetic devices such as alliteration or assonance? Rhythm? The expression of ideas previously unknown and unknowable? What, exactly, is so great about the surahs?
If we knew that, it would add credence to this claim, and also better define the parameters of any attempts to write our own comparable verses.


There was a short thread years ago about the supposed quality of Quranic verses based on the dense use of a wide variety literary and poetic devices. When one looks for them hard enough they're easy to find... in just about any poetic text. I used an example from an Al Stewart song for comparison against the Quranic example that was claimed.

Here's that thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=253905
 
There was a short thread years ago about the supposed quality of Quranic verses based on the dense use of a wide variety literary and poetic devices. When one looks for them hard enough they're easy to find... in just about any poetic text. I used an example from an Al Stewart song for comparison against the Quranic example that was claimed.

Here's that thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=253905

Yea ! rhyming verses are easy to achieve, here is a poem I wrote called praise Allah. It could have been written as a numbered surah, but I don't want to change it.


Praise Allah

Praised be to Allah, the creator of all worlds,
Praise him for the desert, with its endless sea of dunes.
The only things to eat, bushes with spiky thorns,
The Sun a burning orb, to dry and bleach your bones.

Praise Allah for the mirage, of water that is not there,
Without such visions to lead them, many would despair.
But the mirage in the distance gives men strength to go on,
Even though when they arrive there, the oasis is gone.

No wonder dusty Arabs dream of gently flowing streams,
They read of Allah's heaven, and see it in their dreams.
They read of fruit trees laden, with the branches hanging low,
With youths to wait upon them, even thought it is not so.

Praise Allah for the camel, the walking desert ship,
Praise him for two hump camels, with a place to sit.
Praise him for one hump camels, that can carry slaves,
Sliding up and down the hump, destined for early graves.

Praise Allah for the cattle, and praise him for the Goats,
And praise him for instructions, in how to cut their throats.
Praise him for the science that created the first tent,
Saving Arabs from the sandstorms, which are often sent.

Most of all praise Allah for the many rules of war,
And clear instructions, in how to settle every score.
Praise Allah for the sword, to strike unworthy necks,
And his curse on unbelievers, so they may all be vexed.
 
Translation software?

Hi
The problem is not just your English language. I will try harder to reduce this problem. The most important problem is your culture and customs. Which I do not understand at all. Some friends use metaphors and names that I do not understand at all.
I may sometimes use terms or tones in my speech that you do not understand. If you have been disrespected, I apologize to all my friends. Please help me in this regard. Thanks a lot
 
Hi Scorpion; Your brazen and blatant insults to the sacred: God - the Qur'an and Muhammad do not fit your character. You believe in God. So your behavior is strange. Apart from God, one billion and two hundred million zealous Muslims see you.
Do you want to promote the culture of terrorism by inciting them? Say later that Muslims are terrorists. This is a very ugly approach. So put it aside. And correct yourself.
God has created many scorpions. Each of them has its own special bite. As well as its own poison. No matter. We are all servants of God. And the fate of each is determined by God. So pay attention to your own destiny.
The presence of God is important to you. Do not look at religions and holy books. Each of these was brought at a specific time by certain people (God's prophets).
And certain people agree with that. Like me being a Muslim. The important thing is that we all share with you in belief in God. I have said many times: Hostility - war - ridicule - ugly behavior and words and fear is not defined for me at all.If I see it somewhere or in someone, I pass it. And I will not stop. There are more important things that are worth moving. Perhaps the misbehavior of some people is due to ignorance - prejudice or pride. They want opportunities. I hope they understand. And change. Therefore, I will not preach or advise them. I only express my opinions freely.
Forget Norsi Saeed. Be sure that I am Heydarian Saeed. Do not judge by the cover of the book. I recommend referring to the meaning of my name and surname. I always laugh. And everyone around me sees me calmly.
Because I tame the universe. But inside me is a brave and victorious attacking lion. Rest assured, I will not ring the bell to leave this group. I always feel like I'm in the classroom.
I see you as a friend. I do not care about your mission. It is important to me that: Anx who is not on us (our enemy) is with us. (Matthew 26/50) God bless you
:):):)
 
Hi
The problem is not just your English language. I will try harder to reduce this problem. The most important problem is your culture and customs. Which I do not understand at all. Some friends use metaphors and names that I do not understand at all.
I may sometimes use terms or tones in my speech that you do not understand. If you have been disrespected, I apologize to all my friends. Please help me in this regard. Thanks a lot
Nope. The problem is not language at all. We can sort that out.

The real problem is your dishonesty. Remember your first post? No?
Hi
I did some research in the lab to prove the supernatural and I am attaching a written article Please read and comment I answered

And it turns out you have no lab and did no research. When you start off with honking great porky pies, why should anyone believe a word you say?
 
Hi Scorpion; Your brazen and blatant insults to the sacred: God - the Qur'an and Muhammad
It's not an insult to point out the simple facts which suggest that the book you choose to believe is sacred is offensive and nonsensical. Scorpion evidently thinks that it's you and your ghastly book which are insulting what he holds sacred, and he makes a very good case for thinking so.
 
Last edited:
Hi Scorpion; Your brazen and blatant insults to the sacred: God - the Qur'an and Muhammad do not fit your character. You believe in God. So your behavior is strange. Apart from God, one billion and two hundred million zealous Muslims see you.
Do you want to promote the culture of terrorism by inciting them? Say later that Muslims are terrorists. This is a very ugly approach. So put it aside. And correct yourself.
God has created many scorpions. Each of them has its own special bite. As well as its own poison. No matter. We are all servants of God. And the fate of each is determined by God. So pay attention to your own destiny.
The presence of God is important to you. Do not look at religions and holy books. Each of these was brought at a specific time by certain people (God's prophets).
And certain people agree with that. Like me being a Muslim. The important thing is that we all share with you in belief in God. I have said many times: Hostility - war - ridicule - ugly behavior and words and fear is not defined for me at all.If I see it somewhere or in someone, I pass it. And I will not stop. There are more important things that are worth moving. Perhaps the misbehavior of some people is due to ignorance - prejudice or pride. They want opportunities. I hope they understand. And change. Therefore, I will not preach or advise them. I only express my opinions freely.
Forget Norsi Saeed. Be sure that I am Heydarian Saeed. Do not judge by the cover of the book. I recommend referring to the meaning of my name and surname. I always laugh. And everyone around me sees me calmly.
Because I tame the universe. But inside me is a brave and victorious attacking lion. Rest assured, I will not ring the bell to leave this group. I always feel like I'm in the classroom.
I see you as a friend. I do not care about your mission. It is important to me that: Anx who is not on us (our enemy) is with us. (Matthew 26/50) God bless you
:):):)

As far as I am concerned it is the Quran that is an insult to God. It is a book of evil lies about him, and some verses are as if it were God speaking in the first person. In my first poem on post number 2545 I wrote it as God speaking in the first person and that is the kind of thing I would expect God to say if he were actually to speak to someone. But the God I believe in does not speak to mortals. he is an ocean of consciousness that set into motion a perfect plan to allow us to grow and spiritually evolve at our own speed over many incarnations. It needs no intervention and I am certain God had nothing to do with the Quran, or the bible either.

As for 1.2 billion Muslims I thought there were 1.8 billion. But I doubt they all read this forum. I can imagine how mad some of them would get if they did as raging mobs often kill people for blasphemy in places like Pakistan.

As far as I am concerned, anything I can do to undermine, and help stamp out Islam will be progress, and maybe Muslims will revert to Christianity.
Imagine how much better the world would have been without Muhammad's lies. The middle east would probably be Christian, and there would have been far less wars.

You are right Scorpions sting and that is why I picked the name, but I soon found you cannot attack people on this forum. So I moderate myself.
 
Yea ! rhyming verses are easy to achieve, here is a poem I wrote called praise Allah. It could have been written as a numbered surah, but I don't want to change it.


Praise Allah

Praised be to Allah, the creator of all worlds,
Praise him for the desert, with its endless sea of dunes.
The only things to eat, bushes with spiky thorns,
The Sun a burning orb, to dry and bleach your bones.

Praise Allah for the mirage, of water that is not there,
Without such visions to lead them, many would despair.
But the mirage in the distance gives men strength to go on,
Even though when they arrive there, the oasis is gone.

No wonder dusty Arabs dream of gently flowing streams,
They read of Allah's heaven, and see it in their dreams.
They read of fruit trees laden, with the branches hanging low,
With youths to wait upon them, even thought it is not so.

Praise Allah for the camel, the walking desert ship,
Praise him for two hump camels, with a place to sit.
Praise him for one hump camels, that can carry slaves,
Sliding up and down the hump, destined for early graves.

Praise Allah for the cattle, and praise him for the Goats,
And praise him for instructions, in how to cut their throats.
Praise him for the science that created the first tent,
Saving Arabs from the sandstorms, which are often sent.

Most of all praise Allah for the many rules of war,
And clear instructions, in how to settle every score.
Praise Allah for the sword, to strike unworthy necks,
And his curse on unbelievers, so they may all be vexed.


That's brilliant, Scorpion! Had me lol-ing away there. Although you kind of run out of steam towards the end, but I think I'm going to nom this up.
 
Last edited:
Hi
The problem is not just your English language. I will try harder to reduce this problem. The most important problem is your culture and customs. Which I do not understand at all. Some friends use metaphors and names that I do not understand at all.
I may sometimes use terms or tones in my speech that you do not understand. If you have been disrespected, I apologize to all my friends. Please help me in this regard. Thanks a lot


That was just a joke, or at least an attempt at one, following on the posts immediately preceding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom