Andy_Ross
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2010
- Messages
- 86,706
People did not expect the guys at the back to have lived as long as they did.
How long were they expected to live?
What is your point?
People did not expect the guys at the back to have lived as long as they did.
He's claiming he saw some kind of sonar map when he was a intern in Nov 1994.
He says had the cargo gone through the bow ramp there was the real risk of it colliding with the vessel.
I suspect he is some kind of counter-intelligence agent who has suddenly conveniently popped up after 27 years to spread disinformation.
He's been put forward by some Russian guy. How else do these people get the ear of a State Parliament (the Estonian Riigskugu) and the national press?
His theory seems absurd.
Why did you post it?
Why are they not alike?
Throw out the cargo in a storm, cause the ship to founder, to lose power and let it get carried back to sink exactly on top of the neat pile of stuff you just dropped overboard.He suspects that the person who commanded Estonia was ordered to sink the ship on top of the cargo dumped at sea.
They were not exposed to the very high pressure outside which would have killed them straight away, and which was the relevant point. Nobody in the Estonia would have been in a pressure sealed compartment and they would have quickly succumbed to the effects of normal air at very high pressure.
I'm not aware that the Kursk sailors survived longer than anyone expected. They had emergency oxygen generators and used those.
This is a current affairs topic and this article happened to be a news item appearing in a respectable broadsheet today.
Any objections?
CO2 scrubbers would have been of more value.
He's claiming he saw some kind of sonar map when he was a intern in Nov 1994.
He says had the cargo gone through the bow ramp there was the real risk of it colliding with the vessel.
I suspect he is some kind of counter-intelligence agent who has suddenly conveniently popped up after 27 years to spread disinformation.
He's been put forward by some Russian guy. How else do these people get the ear of a State Parliament (the Estonian Riigskugu) and the national press?
His theory seems absurd.
How can I take people claiming to be expert engineers and shipbuilders seriously when they come out with claims such as 'The Herald of Free Enterprise sank faster than the Estonia, dishonestly pretending the two incidents are like for like.
This is a new video on youtube of the Wilhelm Gustloff Real Time Sinking. Given it is 'real time' it lasts less than an hour.
It is relevant as I believe it shows remarkable similarities to the Estonia sinking insofar it has the Russian hallmark fingerprints all over it.
Before I waste an hour on YouTube, what "hallmark fingerprints" exactly?
It was hit by torpedoes.
Apparently only Russians torpedoed ships in WW2.
This is a new video on youtube of the Wilhelm Gustloff Real Time Sinking. Given it is 'real time' it lasts less than an hour.
It is relevant as I believe it shows remarkable similarities to the Estonia sinking insofar it has the Russian hallmark fingerprints all over it.
No, I am not, and shan't.