Matt Giwer
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 1,518
Why? All I said was that Israel accomplished heaps of stuff but that Arab states haven't accomplished anything. Which is 100% true. To not understand this would be to miss out on a major impromptus behind Islamism, and other totalitarian systems for that matter.
The Islamic and Arab world lags behind the rest of the world. Arab universities are bottom of the world. They create nothing, they contribute noting, they're incapable of anything. The Islamists know this. They think that if they embrace the values of Islam when it was at its cultural peak, and purge all the "impurities" then they'll become a superpower. Which is completely mad but that's what totalitarianism is.
Think of the Chinese communists boasting of catching up to Britain by forcing everyone into collectives and melting all their metal in backyard furnaces. An appallingly pathetic idea. We're going to catch up, but not through a free government, free press, free exchange of ideas and free markets (totalitarianism is a rejection of all these things) but through our new visionary way that's even better.
Believe me, the Islamists know how poorly their societies measure up to the rest of the world, including Israel. Supremacist ideology is an attempt to compensate for this and the conspiracy theories absolve them of personal responsibility for their situation.
However one can note the parallel with Christianity. Today Islam can be described as being like Christianity 600 years ago, mainly still in the Dark Ages. A few cities in Italy were part of the beginning of the Renaissance as are a couple of small middle eastern countries today.
But your observations do not address Islam. Rather you are addressing the minority of the population of Muslims in the middle east and north Africa. The majority of Muslims live in countries east of Iraq starting with Iran and stretching to Indonesia. Should you even open your computer you will find many of the parts made in Indonesia and Malaysia.
As for the social customs of the middle east other than the occasional horrible example they are about one century behind the West although they do it their way. A woman unaccompanied in public in the US in 1910? Must be a prostitute. Not wearing a hat? Unthinkable! More than head and hands uncovered in public? Definitely a prostitute. ditto pants, smoking, bicycling. These were quite often crimes for which women were arrested. Pregnant outside of marriage? Never stoning but a nunnery was an alternative to being thrown out of the home with no visible means of support. Skirts above the knee? What were the 1970s coming to?!
But it is not only the women. In the US men did not stop wearing hats in public until the 1950s. Special Sunday clothes died in the 1960s.
There is a lot more but this should suffice to make the point that one must compare and contrast else a discussion cannot be distinguished from a diatribe or hit piece.
