• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The most stupid 911 Conspiracy Theory to date

And I didn't say he did Robin Cook said:



As Foreign Secretary I think he'd know.

And I didn't say you did, genius. bill smith did and he's a liar.


Hmm, let's review:


You don't happen to have the video where Robin Cook said the following do you ?

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US ..."

some other info..
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5656208&postcount=2453 hyperlink

Bill Smith makes the original claim. We'll refer to this as the 'BS' claim.

bs knows that Cook never said that. He's been told before. What a despicable liar he is. I know, huge shock, right? :rolleyes:

Dtugg shows a thread from 9 months ago where we have already shown this to be a false attribution in typically exhaustive JREF(F) detail.

He said it in the Guardian newspaper after 7/7 bombings old boy.

Nice try

No Banana

Roscoe tries to refute Dtugg's re-assertion that the quote was falsely attributed by linking to an article that does not contain the quote in question.

No he didn't. Apparently you didn't even read the article.

Dtugg points this out.

What part of:



Don't you understand?

Give me your address as to where I need to send the donkey ears?

Roscoe gives us glowing evidence that he either can't or won't understand.


I would say that Roscoe is complicit in the false-quote conspiracy. Bill Smith actually perpetrated it - that's our MIHOP scenario - whereas Roscoe tried to help with the cover-up once he realized what had happened. That's LIHOP.
 
You are absolutely right. Why do you need me to tell you why that is? Did the United States handle 9/11 as a law enforcement issue? No, we treated it as an act of war, not as a criminal act. That means that the Bush administration wanted him dead and not sitting in some Federal prison somewhere for the rest o his days. On the off chance that law enforcement caught up with him before a bomb did, then there is no statute of limitation on murder. Meanwhile, indictments are already on the books for pre-9/11 activities so that in the off chance law enforcement did catch up with him, there is already a mechanism to bring him to trial on.

Why do you need an indictment to drop a bomb on the man's head? Now back to the issue you still have not provided evidence for...still waiting.
911 truth can't figure out anything, and besides the fact we are at war with UBL; he is wanted for worldwide terrorism. Which covers everything.

Why do you need an indictment to drop a bomb on the man's head?
911 truth is delusional, not rational, they will not understand this.
 
Interesting how roscoe ignores that his insinuation of a bin Laden - CIA connection is not supported by the source he gave. I've looked through the whole book on scribd with a multitude of search terms and spelling variations and found nothing.
 
That isn't UBL in the picture.

You may want to lay off the youtube and infowars sites, and actually try to read a book.

massive swing and massive miss. doh

ETA: Of course to most westerners all A-RABS look alike... ROFLMAO. Try again.

Actually it kind of looks like Castro. In the end what's the difference? Same old same old.
 
Actually it kind of looks like Castro. In the end what's the difference? Same old same old.

You are SOOOOO right.

In the end what is the difference....

other than this shows how GREAT yet another twoofs research skillz are. It doesn't matter that he took it from some bastion of truth and open information like infowars...

oh wait... he got his information (and image) from infowars... and this isn't who they say it is? Really? Wow...

we can just ignore the lies that come out of the truth movement now right? in the end it is just the

Profanz said:
Same old same old.
 
I think this thread is living up to its title in a big way.
 
You are SOOOOO right.

In the end what is the difference....

other than this shows how GREAT yet another twoofs research skillz are. It doesn't matter that he took it from some bastion of truth and open information like infowars...

oh wait... he got his information (and image) from infowars... and this isn't who they say it is? Really? Wow...

we can just ignore the lies that come out of the truth movement now right? in the end it is just the

Does the CIA supply those uniforms or is it just another coincidence that they all go for the same look?
 
Does the CIA supply those uniforms or is it just another coincidence that they all go for the same look?

typical blather. Personal ignorance and incredulity showing through again.

we have a truther making claims about an image which is not true. Will you denounce them for LYING about it? OR will you do the typical truther dodge?
 
typical blather. Personal ignorance and incredulity showing through again.

we have a truther making claims about an image which is not true. Will you denounce them for LYING about it? OR will you do the typical truther dodge?

typical debunker dodge. typical debunker pretending to respond.
 
typical debunker dodge. typical debunker pretending to respond.

Respond to what?
To the fact that this "truther" posted an image which doesn't show what he claims?

or to your blather about CIA providing uniforms... provide a claim, and I'll happily hand you your ass... (which I have done more times than I can count).
 
Does the CIA supply those uniforms or is it just another coincidence that they all go for the same look?

Not 100% sure but I'd say that it's a Pakistan paratrooper uniform. So I imagine the initial supplier for that uniform would be the Pakistan military. As to it being Bin Laden in the photo, well if Bin Laden is 6'4" then Zbigniew Brzezinski would have to be a similar height.
 
They'll ban me, they'll have to. They can't handle me.

This will give me some great material to pass around the Net.

Lol,can't handle you.We'll just have a laugh at you and your idiotic theories until you go too far and get banned,that's usually what happens to transitory nutters here.
 
What point is proved by breaking the rules and getting banned?

Do you also brag about getting thrown out of theaters for being rude and insulting in a loud voice?

Badmouthing the JREF is a cottage industry in some parts of the net.

Nutcases badmouthing the JREF just shows that's it's doing it's job.
 
Hmm, let's review:




Bill Smith makes the original claim. We'll refer to this as the 'BS' claim.



Dtugg shows a thread from 9 months ago where we have already shown this to be a false attribution in typically exhaustive JREF(F) detail.



Roscoe tries to refute Dtugg's re-assertion that the quote was falsely attributed by linking to an article that does not contain the quote in question.



Dtugg points this out.



Roscoe gives us glowing evidence that he either can't or won't understand.


I would say that Roscoe is complicit in the false-quote conspiracy. Bill Smith actually perpetrated it - that's our MIHOP scenario - whereas Roscoe tried to help with the cover-up once he realized what had happened. That's LIHOP.

That's about two steps too far for a truther to follow.
 

Back
Top Bottom