• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The most stupid 911 Conspiracy Theory to date

BCR said:
You are absolutely right. Why do you need me to tell you why that is? Did the United States handle 9/11 as a law enforcement issue? No, we treated it as an act of war, not as a criminal act. That means that the Bush administration wanted him dead and not sitting in some Federal prison somewhere for the rest o his days. On the off chance that law enforcement caught up with him before a bomb did, then there is no statute of limitation on murder. Meanwhile, indictments are already on the books for pre-9/11 activities so that in the off chance law enforcement did catch up with him, there is already a mechanism to bring him to trial on.

Why do you need an indictment to drop a bomb on the man's head? Now back to the issue you still have not provided evidence for...still waiting.
Click to expand...

Jeez

Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for civility


What was it Churchill said:

"The disadvantages of democracy can be instantly realised by taking a five minute conversation with your average voter"

Your post isn't worth answering.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
roscoe_the_first said:
Causing a few chair shuffles and showing these after_the_fact accomplices to murder that we're well and truly in their face.
Click to expand...

For the first time since I have posted here, I was moved to nearly break all my personal principles and post a picture of a laughing dog.

"Well and truly in their face." :jaw-dropp

You are in NOBODY'S face. The mere fact you are able to post the kind of unsubstantiated fantasy drivel you do without repercussion shows just how 'in their face' you are. If there was a massive conspiracy and you were really worrying the all-powerful masterminds behind it; you'd be dead. It just goes to show that:

You're wrong.
Nobody is listening.
Nobody cares.
You're only here to try and score points against debunkers.

We salute you, brave freedom-fighter, out there on the ragged edge.

Tit. :rolleyes:
 
D'rok said:
Very true:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotana

Feckless twoofer arrogance FTW!
Click to expand...

Yes but I said Rupert Murdoch's son and he sold his stake in News Corp. It never fails to amaze me how you
Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for civility
always put two and two together and make six.

I'm trying to dig up the report of him at Davos billing himself as the chairman who owns Al Jazeera.

Really must start keeping a database.

Al Jazeera is of course on the BSkyB satellite.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
roscoe_the_first said:
They'll ban me, they'll have to. They can't handle me.

This will give me some great material to pass around the Net.
Click to expand...


What point is proved by breaking the rules and getting banned?

Do you also brag about getting thrown out of theaters for being rude and insulting in a loud voice?

Badmouthing the JREF is a cottage industry in some parts of the net.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Jeez

Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for civility


What was it Churchill said:

"The disadvantages of democracy can be instantly realised by taking a five minute conversation with your average voter"

Your post isn't worth answering.
Click to expand...

Yet you answered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
roscoe_the_first said:
Yes but I said Rupert Murdoch's son and he sold his stake in News Corp. It never fails to amaze me how you
Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for civility
always put two and two together and make six.
Click to expand...

But the article that you cited as proof was one that showed News Corp bought a minority state in Rotana. It was an epic fail on your part.

I'm trying to dig up the report of him at Davos billing himself as the chairman who owns Al Jazeera.
Click to expand...
You go ahead and do that. Something tells you won't find anything, liar.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tsig said:
What point is proved by breaking the rules and getting banned?

Do you also brag about getting thrown out of theaters for being rude and insulting in a loud voice?

Badmouthing the JREF is a cottage industry in some parts of the net.
Click to expand...

It will make him feel dangerous.

Plus, he will feel a sense of belonging and companionship with the rest of the nuggets who have been banned from here for committing suicide-by-mod for exactly the same reasons.

Also, he can lie and say he was banned because 'The JREFers' couldn't handle the 'truth'. :rolleyes:
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Yes but I said Rupert Murdoch's son and he sold his stake in News Corp. It never fails to amaze me how you
Edited by Gaspode: 
Edited for civility
always put two and two together and make six.
Click to expand...

And yet you linked to a story in which Rupert Murdoch's son talks about buying a stake in Rotana. This son:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Murdoch_%28media_executive%29

So what's your story now?

I'm trying to dig up the report of him at Davos billing himself as the chairman who owns Al Jazeera.
Click to expand...
I'll wait.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tsig said:
What point is proved by breaking the rules and getting banned?

Do you also brag about getting thrown out of theaters for being rude and insulting in a loud voice?

Badmouthing the JREF is a cottage industry in some parts of the net.
Click to expand...

Theatres don't protect murderers.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Theatres don't protect murderers.
Click to expand...

Indeed. Because the JREF 9/11 CT Forum is all that stands between the mighty US Government and the millions-strong hordes of truthers waiting to bring them screaming to justice.

If we weren't here for you to throw yourself against and commit suicide-by-mod ending in you being banned, the 'truth' would have been known YEARS ago wouldn't it?!

FFS. :rolleyes:
 
Hokulele said:
You realize that JimBenArm is going to be flooding your PMs as soon as he sees this, yes?
Click to expand...

Oh... Gawd! (*Groans*).
facepalm_smiley295.gif
 
SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
Indeed. Because the JREF 9/11 CT Forum is all that stands between the mighty US Government and the millions-strong hordes of truthers waiting to bring them screaming to justice.

If we weren't here for you to throw yourself against and commit suicide-by-mod ending in you being banned, the 'truth' would have been known YEARS ago wouldn't it?!

FFS. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
++You have mail++

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5689276&postcount=44 hyperlink
 
bill smith said:
I had picked up on the fact that Al-Jazeera was a front more than two years ago.
Click to expand...

Then surely you can provide evidence for this where roscoe has failed so spectacularly. Off you go!
 
Hokulele said:
Sadly, yes. And he seems to think we are all guys.
Click to expand...

Hok.

We all know that there are NO women on the interwebs. It is tooooo complicated for da fragile female mind.

When a "woman" posts, I'd bet my NWO salary they look like this

fat_man.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom