The Missiles at Ground Zero

[MaGZ]

babazaroni,

It was an accident that the fighter missile hit WTC 7.
The fighters were sent first to intercept Flight 11 then proceeded to shoot down the second plane.

 

[babazaroni]

babazaroni,

It was an accident that the fighter missile hit WTC 7.
The fighters were sent first to intercept Flight 11 then proceeded to shoot down the second plane.

Then why worry about the 'secrets' in WTC 7?

Or is it your contention that once the missile hit WTC 7, the secrets were vulnerable, so a demolition team had to be sent in?

 

[MaGZ]

stateofgrace,

I think the order likely came from the NORAD commanding officer.

 

[kookbreaker]

Wildcat,
So on 9/11, NORAD was just waiting around to get the orders. They were just following protocol and could not act on their own in an emergency situation.

So what were they going to do on their own? Start shooting one of the dozens of unhijacked airliners in the skies? Chase down random flights in hopes that it turns out to be a hijacked plane?

Do you really believe that?

Do you beleive the nonsense you spout?

 

[stateofgrace]

stateofgrace,

I think the order likely came from the NORAD commanding officer.

I do not care what you think, offer proof, or retract your statement.

 

[Loss Leader]

The two fighters flew straight to NYC supersonic. They probable went out to the holding area from 9:09 to 9:13 (after they tried to shoot down the second plane over NYC) in order to clear space for all planes to land. It is nonsense to suggest NORAD did not know where to send the two fighters.

Your theory contradicts the memory of the civilian air traffic controlers on duty on 9/11. Please explain why these several different individuals from different cities all agreed to go on NBC and lie about what they saw that day. Assuming their silence could be bought, how did the government buy their performances on Dateline? And why did the government send them onto Dateline? I mean, the official story wasn't exactly in jeopardy, it didn't need bolstering. Wouldn't it have made more sense for these people just to refuse to talk and stay off TV?

Or wouldn't it make more sense that the astonishing mountain of evidence tending to disprove your theory would trump the paucity of evidence you have to support your theory? And wouldn't the few remaining doubts about the official story trump the overwhelming doubts plaguing your story?

Or was 2001 the year they introduced the new, silent invisible 20.8 lb. warhead sidewinder missile that morphs in midair into the silent invisible 1,000 lb. warhead tomahawk missile?

 

[Loss Leader]

So what were they going to do on their own? Start shooting one of the dozens of unhijacked airliners in the skies? Chase down random flights in hopes that it turns out to be a hijacked plane?

At 9:10 a.m. on September 11, 2001, there were three thousand civilian planes in the air over the United States. I have no idea how many more were inbound.

 

[Gravy]

stateofgrace,

I think the order likely came from the NORAD commanding officer.

Your opinions are based on ignorance. They will never hold any weight on a forum that's devoted to CRITICAL THINKING.

Feel free to return when you have a single shred of evidence for your preposterous claims.

This isn't a game. These events happened to real people, and affect thousands of real people every day. Please take them seriously and do not make wild, unsupportable claims.

Fair enough?

 

[MaGZ]

babazroni,
I was presenting a scenario as to why WTC 7 might be pulled: so sensitive national security information could be secured in a damaged building.

Also the building was likely to fall at some time and a controlled demolition would protect rescue workers in the area.

 

[gumboot]

babazroni,
I was presenting a scenario as to why WTC 7 might be pulled: so sensitive national security information could be secured in a damaged building.

Also the building was likely to fall at some time and a controlled demolition would protect rescue workers in the area.

Er... has it ever occured to you that it DID fall some time?

-Gumboot

 

[stateofgrace]

babazroni,
I was presenting a scenario as to why WTC 7 might be pulled: so sensitive national security information could be secured in a damaged building.

Also the building was likely to fall at some time and a controlled demolition would protect rescue workers in the area.

No you have not.

Are you now saying WTC 7 was demolished by explosives and was not hit by a missile?

Please make up your mind and offer a plausible scenario.

 

[Gravy]

babazroni,
I was presenting a scenario as to why WTC 7 might be pulled: so sensitive national security information could be secured in a damaged building.

Also the building was likely to fall at some time and a controlled demolition would protect rescue workers in the area.

You seem to have covered all the bases. Anything else before you go?

 

[MaGZ]

It really amazes me you people consider yourselves to be critical thinkers.

You simply accept what the government and media tells you and you think it to be true.

 

[CHF]

It really amazes me you people consider yourselves to be critical thinkers.

You simply accept what the government and media tells you and you think it to be true.

Oh we are more than willing to disbelieve the guv.

All we need is SOLID PROOF. Got any?

 

[WildCat]

Also the building was likely to fall at some time and a controlled demolition would protect rescue workers in the area.

Let me get this straight... you're claiming that in order to protect rescue workers people are going to enter a burning building w/ large amounts of explosives?

 

[babazaroni]

babazroni,
I was presenting a scenario as to why WTC 7 might be pulled: so sensitive national security information could be secured in a damaged building.

Also the building was likely to fall at some time and a controlled demolition would protect rescue workers in the area.

Well, if the second is true, why would the government deny it?

They could claim they were protecting rescue workers without revealing that they were protecting national security information at the same time.

Perfect cover.

 

[MaGZ]

stateofgrace,

Read the article if you are that confused.

 

[fezzic]

A question for everyone.

What would the government do to protect national secrets in WTC 7?

Before or After it blew up the building?

If before, it would post the usual guards at the usual points of access to the classified faclities. Probably would go mostly unnoticed given the HELL that was occurring nearby.

If after, (and if the secrets were truly SECRETS) it would put up a barbwire fence, post armed guards at the gates, run patrols around the perimeter, keep unauthorized people (which would be just about everyone engaged in the rescue operations) out of the area, and it would all be rather obvious that they were doing it. Meanwhile, it would bring in its own people to monitor the few workers who will dig out the place. At the same time, it would be having to tap dance around all the interest the effort to secure the WTC 7 site would generate.

Like the whatsis... Realistice thread (re: a reinforced concrete core) it would all be very obvious and impossible to conceal . It would not go unmentioned and be relatively trivially easy to show that the event (securing the WTC 7 site) actually happened.

 

[stateofgrace]

It really amazes me you people consider yourselves to be critical thinkers.

You simply accept what the government and media tells you and you think it to be true.

Isn't it just?

Correct me if I am wrong but you reckon that fighter jets fired a missile at flight 175, it missed it and hit WTC 7. Nobody noticed this and some time later Flight 175 hit one of the Towers. Six hours later a building that had been hit by a missile which nobody noticed and just happened to be per rigged with explosives is demolished to protect national security information.

It is neither the US government that tells me this nor the media; it is the pure stupidity of you that tells me you are completely wrong.

 

[MaGZ]

babazroni,

I think the government refused to admit to the controlled demolition of WTC 7 because of national security concerns surrounding the building. The remains of the building would have to be taken to a secret location and all sensitive information would be secured and removed.

Also the government probably feared the situation they have now, where some people think there was a government conspiracy to blowup all of the WTC buildings.