The Marjorie Taylor Greene thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
CORed said:
I am curious as to why this would be a problem (questions directed at Distracted1 more than quoted poster). Is there some test that needs to be conducted to determine if somebody is "really" transgender, or "just pretending?". Should it be legal to discriminate in housing, employment, or public accommodations against somebody who is "just pretending" and therefore not a "real" transgendered person? If so, why? Or is the contention that all transgendered people are "just pretending", and therefore need to be shunned by all right-thinking people?
Click to expand...

Marjorie Taylor Greene, the subject of this thread, literally said trans people are pretending. Distracted1 defended that claim.
 
Some posters have an uncanny ability to be misunderstood in virtually every thread. Why does everyone suddenly suffer from reading comprehension when these posters are around? It's just so weird!

:jaw-dropp
 
CORed said:
I am curious as to why this would be a problem (questions directed at Distracted1 more than quoted poster). Is there some test that needs to be conducted to determine if somebody is "really" transgender, or "just pretending?". Should it be legal to discriminate in housing, employment, or public accommodations against somebody who is "just pretending" and therefore not a "real" transgendered person? If so, why? Or is the contention that all transgendered people are "just pretending", and therefore need to be shunned by all right-thinking people?
Click to expand...

You just nailed it!
 
wareyin said:
Man, right wingers just can't help but completely "misinterpret" any sort of communication they're involved in, huh? Before we go into the weeds with your latest "hey look, a squirrel" defense, let's get back to the bit you're trying to district from at the moment: MTG's longtime anti-trans activism that you, in your right wing anti-trans stance, are attempting to wave away as not being anti-trans but anti-some part of the protection from anti-trans-discrimination bill that she was publicly against before it was written.

Then, after you rewrite history enough to justify that bit of right wingerness, we can circle back to how creating a god-damn golden idol is the ******* biblical definition of worshipping, jesus ******* christ!
Click to expand...
Withdraw your lie, and I will consider addressing your further misrepresentations.
 
CORed said:
I am curious as to why this would be a problem (questions directed at Distracted1 more than quoted poster). Is there some test that needs to be conducted to determine if somebody is "really" transgender, or "just pretending?". Should it be legal to discriminate in housing, employment, or public accommodations against somebody who is "just pretending" and therefore not a "real" transgendered person? If so, why? Or is the contention that all transgendered people are "just pretending", and therefore need to be shunned by all right-thinking people?
Click to expand...
You believe that "pretending" in that context means pretending to be trans ?
 
Bogative said:
I would recommend boffing powerful politicians if she has executive aspirations. It worked for Kamala.
Click to expand...

Stacyhs said:
Care to support that with any evidence or are you just into making spurious allegations like Trump?
Click to expand...

Bogative said:
https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Sure-I-dated-Kamala-Harris-So-what-13562972.php
Click to expand...

Basically you're accusing Harris of prostituting herself which explains your previous offensive avatar. Typical of the right-wing which made other nasty and untrue allegations. Resorting to such disgusting and false attacks does seem to be the 'go to' of the "party of family values" today, though. This is what Reuters fact check reveals:

The claim Harris “had an affair with a married man” is technically true. But given Brown had been separated from his wife for more than a decade, the claim is misleading. Harris and Brown’s relationship was not secret and they made public appearances as a couple ( here , here ).

In a 2003 interview during her campaign for San Francisco district attorney, Harris told SF Weekly that she refused “to design my campaign around criticizing Willie Brown for the sake of appearing to be independent when I have no doubt that I am independent of him — and that he would probably right now express some fright about the fact that he cannot control me.” (here)

On Jan. 26, 2019, Brown published a short op-ed in the San Francisco Chronicle with the headline “Sure, I dated Kamala Harris. So what?” (here). Brown said he had recently “been peppered with calls from the national media about my ‘relationship’ with Kamala Harris, particularly since it became obvious that she was going to run for president. Most of them, I have not returned. Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago.”
Click to expand...
 
Stacyhs said:
Basically you're accusing Harris of prostituting herself which explains your previous offensive avatar. Typical of the right-wing which made other nasty and untrue allegations. Resorting to such disgusting and false attacks does seem to be the 'go to' of the "party of family values" today, though...
Click to expand...

This happens over and over. A right winger sees something in a thread that upsets them -- in this case probably the video of Marjorie Taylor Greene groping the donald trump cutout plus the comment about Greene getting it on with trump -- and they cast about for a way to give some 'payback.'

As someone pointed out: instead of defending their position the wingers often accuse anyone who disagrees as misunderstanding their position. Then they drag that out until people give up.

It's a very lame way to try and discuss something, but it's all you can expect. I just skip past this nonsense. ;)
 
wareyin said:
Oh, no, you won't address the errors in your claims unless I retract a non-existent lie? Well, that's one way to avoid any further embarrassment on your part.
Click to expand...
You are now doubling down on your lie by lieing again.
Post 845 you made a claim that I was defending Trump in a specific other thread. A lie. If you cannot be bothered to withdraw your lie- or at least excuse it by claiming to be mistaken, then honest conversation with you is not possible.
 
...eh, I'm not interested in Bogative's raggedy old racist stereotypes about how horrible black people are, so instead, here's MTG complaining that going through a metal detector is "voterr suppression", as opposed to just "security", and then stating that "waiting in line" is no more voter suppression than standing in line at a grocery store.

Because every person needs very specific ID to go to a grocery store. And the lines are typically and purposefully hours long.

Also, if you didn't buy groceries last "grocery day", or you have a similar name to someone who shoplifted from another store, you might find that you are wiped off the "grocery-buyer's list" and will starve, and one of the two major political parties in the US are hellbent on making this even more difficult, if not impossible, by shortening the time the grocery store is open, moving the grocery store from one place to another, and so forth.

Also, nobody should be allowed to order groceries for delivery.
 
Distracted1 said:
You are now doubling down on your lie by lieing again.
Post 845 you made a claim that I was defending Trump in a specific other thread. A lie. If you cannot be bothered to withdraw your lie- or at least excuse it by claiming to be mistaken, then honest conversation with you is not possible.
Click to expand...

Sure, sure anything you can use to change the subject from your errors. You not only don't have to defend yourself here, you clearly can't defend your claims.

So, how about MTG's anti-trans activism that you keep trying to ignore and change the subject from?
 
This is a blatant attempt to derail this thread. Evidence? We don't need no stinkin' evidence.

What pray tell does any of this have to do with Marjorie Taylor Greene? The comment that seems to have been so intolerable was based on, not Greene attempting a sexual liaison with trump to further her career, but groping a cardboard cutout of him. Remember?

In case anyone thinks the screen cap is misleading, here's the video link on Twitter. It's 29-seconds long for those with a short attention span. ;)

This guy right here is great!
 

Attachments

  • Go Gurl.jpg
    Go Gurl.jpg
    61.1 KB · Views: 9
This comment gives even more context to some of Greene's posturing.
“I'm telling you we've got a South Africa in the backyard of Atlanta, Georgia.''
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Ain no threat jus reality.jpg
    Ain no threat jus reality.jpg
    59.7 KB · Views: 19
newyorkguy said:
This comment gives even more context to some of Greene's posturing.
Click to expand...

Holy crap I didn't realize that was a real poster/image and not a joke.

I want to go back to the timeline I came from, what the hell is going on here? Let me OUT!
 
mgidm86 said:
Holy crap I didn't realize that was a real poster/image and not a joke.

I want to go back to the timeline I came from, what the hell is going on here? Let me OUT!
Click to expand...

And she wonders why Pelosi won't let her bring her gun onto the House floor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom