The Marjorie Taylor Greene thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
2 threads on twitter discussing the science of gender


[FONT=&quot]https://twitter.com/ScienceVet2/status/1035246030500061184?s=20[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][FONT=&quot]https://twitter.com/RebeccaRHelm/status/1207834357639139328?s=20[/FONT][/FONT]
 
Steve said:
So your comment was, as I thought, just noise completely disconnected from the discussion. Thank you for confirming.
Click to expand...

No. I was referring to an allegation that someone is pretending. But I was asked who is pretending. For me to think someone is pretending, I would have to agree with the allegation. And I don't.
 
Wudang said:
2 threads on twitter discussing the science of gender


[FONT=&quot]https://twitter.com/ScienceVet2/status/1035246030500061184?s=20[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][FONT=&quot]https://twitter.com/RebeccaRHelm/status/1207834357639139328?s=20[/FONT][/FONT]
Click to expand...

Won't help. Greene and her sycophants are blind to reality.
 
BobTheCoward said:
No. I was referring to an allegation that someone is pretending. But I was asked who is pretending. For me to think someone is pretending, I would have to agree with the allegation. And I don't.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant comments are irrelevant regardless of how many words you add to them. This game is over, Bob, Tata till next time
 
Distracted1 said:
"pretending" is a reasonable interpretation of a man/woman behaving in such a way as to attempt to give the impression that they are a gender other than what they are.

"refusing" is also a reasonable description of someone insisting that they are a gender different from what they are.

These are not hateful, nor discriminotory descriptors. They represent an outlook that is opposed to the agenda pushed by many trans-folk, but they are hardly outside of mainstream ideology. One could argue that calling them "hateful" or "vile" is such a transparent attempt to mischaracterize the sentiments based upon an agenda, that those arguments are just as kooky as a "jewish space laser"
Click to expand...

You may think you're helping your case by jumping back and forth here, or maybe you just can't keep track of the conversation. A clue to what a statement is in response to is the quoted post included in that post, if that helps.

You denied that Greene was denying the existence of trans people. She literally said they're pretending. If they are pretending to be trans then they don't exist as trans.

Your claim was false. You thinking her claim is reasonable doesn't change what she claimed.
 
wareyin said:
You may think you're helping your case by jumping back and forth here, or maybe you just can't keep track of the conversation. A clue to what a statement is in response to is the quoted post included in that post, if that helps.

You denied that Greene was denying the existence of trans people. She literally said they're pretending. If they are pretending to be trans then they don't exist as trans.

Your claim was false. You thinking her claim is reasonable doesn't change what she claimed.
Click to expand...

But they still exist.
 
wareyin said:
You may think you're helping your case by jumping back and forth here, or maybe you just can't keep track of the conversation. A clue to what a statement is in response to is the quoted post included in that post, if that helps.

You denied that Greene was denying the existence of trans people. She literally said they're pretending. If they are pretending to be trans then they don't exist as trans.

Your claim was false. You thinking her claim is reasonable doesn't change what she claimed.
Click to expand...
Her claim is that they are pretending to be a particular gender. Not that they are pretending to be Trans.
 
grunion said:
Have you ever felt hungry, tired, wet or cold? Were these just delusions?
Click to expand...
If during those times I was objectively hungry, tired, Cold, or wet- they were not.

If I felt wet while not being wet- I was experiencing a break with reality.
If I insist you treat me as if I am wet during that period of time, I am making an unreasonable demand upon you, one which you are under no obligation to honor.
 
Last edited:
Dr. Keith said:
You simply aren't getting the point: a response in kind is possible, but I don't think she is capable of it.

I would respond in kind by posting a rainbow flag, because I have LGBTQ loved ones I care about.

I could post a BLM flag because I have been inspired by what their movement has done in a short time.

I could post a vet flag because I have loved ones who are vets who I think do not get treated as well as they should.

Or is your contention that I need to find a response in kind that fits with MTG's message of bigotry and exclusion? Sorry, not happening.
Click to expand...

I know - one could respond in kind with a Confederate flag, because one has loved ones who are traitors and thinks they get a bad reputation.
 
Distracted1 said:
If during those times I was objectively hungry, tired, Cold, or wet- they were not.

If I felt wet while not being wet- I was experiencing a break with reality.
If I insist you treat me as if I am wet during that period of time, I am making an unreasonable demand upon you, one which you are under no obligation to honor.
Click to expand...

Objectively hungry? Do you think through what you're typing out at all, or just randomly combine words and hope they make sense? I'd ask you how you verify someone is hungry objectively, but I think we'd just get some bigoted justification that takes us down another tangent. It's really the only way one can support MTG, by trying to "hey look a squirrel" any discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom