The Gospel

First, give me a moment so I can pound my head against the keyboard.

Okay, let me try and get this cleared up.

Keep in mind, when you are discussing God, or what is purported to be God, the whole thing centers not on Holiness, or the Sacred. You have to remember that most people who discuss God aren't really interested in the realities that may or may not exist in regards to Deity. What's really going on is a power grab.

See, I understand this quite well. I've been there. The whole business with Guilt and Sin really is designed to get you to surrender your autonomy to someone who claims to have your best interest at heart. Give up some of your free will in order to gain an eternity in Heaven. Of course, if you pray a lot, and donate money, Jesus will be happy with you and will set aside all the rules of physics and logic just so he can BLESS you. Just ask Benny Hinn, or Kenneth Copeland, Joyce Meyers, or any number of the "Blab It and Grab It" crowd who are out there telling you that if you'll just pray their way, (and send along a sizeable donation), your life will be easier, your world will be one of joy and celebration.

I have to repeat something (again): In running this whole business by one person in this household who remains devoutly Christian, Peggy, she's left shaking her head. "She doesn't get it," Peggy will complain, (even as she's making a prayer list for people on this board, hoping that Fowlsound's tests come up negative, that Suez's heart will be healed, that Randi's health will return, and he'll be back to his skeptical self).

I married a woman who loves her Lord. But she loves Him so much, she is realistic about what she's to do in this world. She didn't preach at TAM. She listened. She wanted to spend time with some of those I've talked about, (except her damned asthma kept kicking in). She crocheted. (BTW: LostAngeles, if it was you, Peggy wanted to know how you're doing with the pattern you copied. She's doing okay, but sometimes, that stuff reads like heiroglyphics.) She spent time listening to guys like RandFan and Robert Lancaster. She wanted to know what she could do to serve others, rather than try to turn people into something they're not. We didn't get as much time to spend with people we wanted to meet, but you know, there's always next year. (And I'm hoping to be there.)

See, one of the things I got from reading the Bible was that life is one hell of a hard road. God may be good, kind, and generous, but that doesn't mean that you're going to have it easy. If anything, if you're a true believer, life is going to be harder than ever.

So what's it all about? It's not about grabbing your ankles for your local minister. It's recognizing that life is hard not just for you, but for everyone. It means you close your mouth, open your hands, and help others when the call goes out. It means you SERVE. You EARN the right to be heard, and you only do that by surrendering yourself, not to be another body in the pews, playing the same games as everyone else in the Church, but to give of yourself to help others within that body and well beyond.

Hell, I wanted to be a missionary. I had a pastor who told me that was an honorable goal. At least, it was, until I told him I wanted to teach people how to dig wells, maintain water pumps, and how to do basic maintenance on mechanical equipment. Suddenly, that wasn't such a hot idea, because a "REAL" missionary went to Bible College and went out and preached the Word. Except that I kept reading the climbing numbers of people throughout the world who died every year from a lack of potable water. I figured if I wanted to tell people about Jesus, the best way to do it would be to show them that Jesus cared enough about them to send someone to show them how to dig a well and set up a hand pump so they wouldn't die. I might still go into the Third World to do that, except now, I won't be pounding on a book that seems to have less and less to do with the world as it really is.

Or for that matter, nor will I be associated with a group that is more intent on filling souls, but leaving bellies empty.

That's the problem I have with Kathy: she talks, talks, talks, but there's nothing to show for her actions. Kittynh has served, still serves, and is a joy to hear from day in, day out. MLynn, KellyJ, and several others who post here, are involved, and serve, and give of themselves. They can relate to where I am, who I am, and what I'm doing in my life. My regret is that Peggy couldn't have gotten together with these people. (Kittynh, as some of us remember, wound up getting sick herself at TAM.) While Kathy babbles on about Jesus, there are those in this community and beyond who actually are involved on a daily basis doing what they know the Gospel commands.

It's actually pretty simple. When the multitudes came to hear Jesus preach, the Apostles told him to send the people away so they could get something to eat. Jesus answered, "You give them something to eat."

You know, Kathy actually reminds me of the rich man in the parable about Lazarus. At the end, while he's suffering in Hell, he keeps telling Abraham, "Send Lazarus..." "Send Lazarus..." "Send Lazarus..." She doesn't get it. She doesn't want to serve. She wants God to send someone else to do all that icky stuff, the feeding the hungry, the sheltering the homeless, the healing the sick, the teaching the untutored, and so on. She wants to be one of those "FOPs," the Friends of Pastor, who can turn up their noses at those unenlightened heathens. She wants to be a Church Lady, like Dana Carvey showed us. And what's so sad about this is she's succeeding.

In the meantime, she's showing us, in reality, that if there's a God, he's not someone you really want to know. Since the body (the Church) can't do anything without the Head's (Jesus') approval, you have to wonder just what sort of snot-nosed punk this guy Jesus is if you have to use Christian Dude, Kurious Kathy, 1inChrist, or any number of pseudoChristian trolls as examples.

Just a few thoughts, gang. Sorry to have disturbed the "debate," such as it is... was... whatever.
 
Then this one statement tells me you are not truely trying to see things from a holy God's perspective. The only one that was capable of coming in the flesh and living a life without sin was God the Son. Because Jesus was/is holy his sacrifice was acceptable to God.

2 Cor. 5:21...God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.

I myself will be forever greatful for this gift of grace. Jesus died to redeem us from our crummy sinful world! If you want to get mad at someone, why don't you look at Adam or Satan first? At least this is what I reflect on. We live in a fallen world.

Yes, and hijackers felt priveleged to give their lives for their beloved Allah and believed in their heaven so much that they eagerly went to receive their rewards via immolation. And Jim Jones And David Koresh's followers believed in their religion so completely that they, too, killed themselves for their god.
And Charlie Manson really really believes his schizophrenic delusions and so do (did?) some of his followers. Kids are gloriously happy when santa brings presents...LSD and epilepsy can bring ecstatic religious experiences--or so I've heard.

And this world isn't crummy--it's actually really really interesting--check out a science book and see for yourself. Psst...there is no such thing as souls. There is no afterlife...there is no god...there is no "test"...there is no "hell"--let go of your silly superstitions and enjoy the rest of this life and the many wonders being discovered everyday. The bible didn't even mention DNA--we've mapped the whole human genome! We can SEE how we are connected to all life forms and we can estimate how far back our common ancestor was. Neurology shows very clearly how consciousness is a product of the brain. It's true. It's much more satisfying and wonderous than the crap some preacher is filling your head with...the evidence is there for anyone who cares to look--but you can't seep your brain in woo for decades and expect it to develop connections for logic...
 
Non-sequiter. Whether they are the same god or not does not negate your appearance as a frothing at the mouth radical willing to kill for your faith.

You sound like a fundamentalist extremist muslim willing to be a terrorist, just by changing one word in your posts.

Now ponder that.

And Kathy may wish to convert to Islam, because god seemed to be answering to the name of Allah if one uses the hijacked planes of 9-11 as support.
 
Yes, and hijackers felt priveleged to give their lives for their beloved Allah and believed in their heaven so much that they eagerly went to receive their rewards via immolation. And Jim Jones And David Koresh's followers believed in their religion so completely that they, too, killed themselves for their god.
And Charlie Manson really really believes his schizophrenic delusions and so do (did?) some of his followers. Kids are gloriously happy when santa brings presents...LSD and epilepsy can bring ecstatic religious experiences--or so I've heard.

And this world isn't crummy--it's actually really really interesting--check out a science book and see for yourself. Psst...there is no such thing as souls. There is no afterlife...there is no god...there is no "test"...there is no "hell"--let go of your silly superstitions and enjoy the rest of this life and the many wonders being discovered everyday. The bible didn't even mention DNA--we've mapped the whole human genome! We can SEE how we are connected to all life forms and we can estimate how far back our common ancestor was. Neurology shows very clearly how consciousness is a product of the brain. It's true. It's much more satisfying and wonderous than the crap some preacher is filling your head with...the evidence is there for anyone who cares to look--but you can't seep your brain in woo for decades and expect it to develop connections for logic...

Touche', sir. And, nominated.
 
THAT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN ASKING!!!!

?

Do you have something a little less sophomoric?

Christians do seem to repeat the same little trite hallmarky phrases, biblical platitutes, and intelligent design caca...

I know that as I.Q. and education goes up, religiosity goes down, but I've often wondered about the glaring discrepencies in intelligence between "true believers" and their more reasoned peers. Does religion make you stupid by teaching the notion that "truth can come from faith"--"you musn't question god"--"believe this crap or suffer eternally", etc. Or are the daft (gullible?) (naive?) drawn towards religion? Or do they just spawn more and pass on thier ignorant genes coupled with their inane memes. And what I find most galling is their confidence in their "rightness" despite a complete lack of evidence, logic, or reason. Amazing.
 
Hey delphi, I do not claim to be an apologeticist, but I am learning more each day about the different teachings in and out of the Christian faith.
I guess what I am learning most right now is the basics about what holds up to the Law of Love?

Here's another statement I found in the book I'm reading by F.S Coplestone.

Man's disobedience has robbed God of honour and glory which obedience would have brought to him. Therefore the Divine plan of redemption (delivering man from sin) needs to restore to God all the honour and glory lost through man breaking the law of love. If this were not so then God would be the eternal loser (as a result of man's sin) which is impossible. In light of this, the one true religion,(based only on supernatural revelation), needs to reveal that Divine plan of salvation has restored to God all honour and glory lost through mans sin. Any doctrine that fails to do this cannot be true.

Would you care to give me an opinion on this last statement?

Yeah...but what about women? And if the almighty created us, why make a sinful model...isn't it perverse to create life that could suffer eternally. I mean, I wouldn't give birth if I thought there was a chance that my child could spend eternity in hell. It's a bit much, you know. I think it's why Andrea Yates killed her kids before they could sin and end up in hell. Do you think she achieved her aim of ensuring a blissful eternity for her beloved children? Women aren't particularly respected in any religion--certainly not in christianity...You honor a god who doesn't seem to even consider you...
 
You may not claim to be, but by definition you are an apologist.



Please cite the "Law of Love" from source and give all applicable bylaws.



It is pure crap. It makes broad sweeping statements and assumptions without providing evidence to support the position. While it doesn't specifically state Christianity as the one true religion, it assumes it, and it does nothing to show why that brand of mythology is any better or worse than other mythologies. It cites "man's disobedience" but does not explain what, why, who and how it comes to the conclusion man is disobedient at all.
I think my question for you personally FS is how do you define love? I know how I define it personally and scripturally. The scriptural basis is obvious, Love God with all your heart, mind, and soul, and then love your neighbor as yourself.
A personal perception of what I would define as the ideal love would have to be unconditonal. I think true love is really when we give it away expecting nothing in return. Call me a dreamer if you like, but I do believe many of us are capable of love on this level. Or are you going to tell me the idea of love is a myth too?


Love your neighbor (but don't covet their wife)...Love everyone like you love your invisible sky friend who may not even exist...love muslims the same as your neighbor the same as child molestors the same as atheists...the same as your dog...the same as your spouse...the same as James Randi-- Excuse me--you love these all the same? Just like Jesus asks? I love truth. This seems to be wisdom directed at 3 year olds...you find depth in odd passages and ignore all that doesn't fit into your carefully crafted christian fairytale.

You are ridiculously easy to make fun of because your inanity and hubris doesn't seem to know any bounds. I hope your personal savior is proud.
(And I hope he doesn't answer to allah--if so, you're going to (gasp) hell)
tsk.
 
Last edited:
Touche', sir. And, nominated.

Thank you! And I enjoy your posts on multiple threads. I was onces a "believer" too. But, I've never been a sir. I'm a mam--yep!--two x chromosomes and proud of it! (my balls are only metaphorical and tend to exist more in the cyberworld then in the real world--you'd be surprised at my misleadingly demure appearance I assure you.)
 
Christians do seem to repeat the same little trite hallmarky phrases, biblical platitutes, and intelligent design caca...

I know that as I.Q. and education goes up, religiosity goes down, but I've often wondered about the glaring discrepencies in intelligence between "true believers" and their more reasoned peers. Does religion make you stupid by teaching the notion that "truth can come from faith"--"you musn't question god"--"believe this crap or suffer eternally", etc. Or are the daft (gullible?) (naive?) drawn towards religion? Or do they just spawn more and pass on thier ignorant genes coupled with their inane memes. And what I find most galling is their confidence in their "rightness" despite a complete lack of evidence, logic, or reason. Amazing.


Articulett,

The answer is so simple that you all seem to be having trouble getting it.

Reason is the last attribute to be developed by young human minds. It starts to develop (according to good solid research by Jean Pagiet in the 50's, which has been substantially corroborated by all subsequent work in the field) from around age 7. If you start from around age 3 - when a human child will believe whatever its told by its parents - filling its mind with absurd garbage, and you program this in not as rational 'best present' knowledge, but instead as 'the actual state of reality' (basically, as ROM memory) then can you really imagine that the child is going to have a shot at developing reason? Consider the implicit instruction: "Develop your ability to think straight, from the assumption that reality itself doesn't make any sense". Take an honest look at the kind of garbage that all monotheistic religions contain: That reality is created and maintained by an invisible supernatural being, who possess logically exclusive properties, and whose behavior is entirely irrational. Get a kid to accept that kind of stuff by age 4 or 5 and - as the Jesuits were so fond of saying - 'You've got him for life'. What you all seem to be missing in your responses to this thread is that a person whose mind has been wrecked by religion can no more reason with you then a paraplegic can go for a walk with you. Its a bitch, but there it is.
 
Hi ceo, thanks for your response here. I just shared Tommy's story which was written I don't know how long ago by Mr Powell. I don't even know if this John Powell is the same one everyone is talking about.

I had gotten this e-mail from my mom and just wanted to share what I think is a very touching story about Tommy! You guys again took a story I meant to share about Tommy and start making it a story about the guy who wrote it. Why do good things always seem to get twisted around as a bad thing on this board?

Anyways the testimony of Tommy came from this wesite w/many others.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/index-inspirational.htm

Sigh. I yearn for a simpler time.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43074&page=38

KK, there are some good things that this forum will never make bad.
 
Get a kid to accept that kind of stuff by age 4 or 5 and - as the Jesuits were so fond of saying - 'You've got him for life'. What you all seem to be missing in your responses to this thread is that a person whose mind has been wrecked by religion can no more reason with you then a paraplegic can go for a walk with you.

In fairness to the Jesuits, however, they've tended to produce more than their fair share of exceptional reasoners.
 
Articulett,

The answer is so simple that you all seem to be having trouble getting it...

What you all seem to be missing in your responses to this thread is that a person whose mind has been wrecked by religion can no more reason with you then a paraplegic can go for a walk with you. Its a bitch, but there it is.

Well, Kathy may be a lost cause, but I was once a believer...and I think that if seeds get planted amongst readers--then some may fluorish. I ask the kind of questions and give the kind of information that helped lead me out of superstious unproductive thinking. Children are taught religion, santa stories, etc. at the same time they are taught that the earth is a sphere and some basic scientific concepts. The problem is that they are not given the tools to separate "factual truth" from "belief or opinion". And faith is pushed as the better of the two methods. I think it's important to get the message out that evidence is the best way to find the truth; I also think it's important to challenge the notion of "souls" because it is the hook that religions use to suck people in--it's exploits our consciousness and our awareness that it will end--it makes us open to all sorts of manipulation to make sure this "soul" lives happily ever after...or horribly ever after. We seem like "souls" like the earth "seems" flat. It can be a comforting illusions, but it's just not supported by any evidence. Compare that to the vast amounts of continually accumulating data, information, and evidence in fields such as genetics, neurology, psychology, DNA, etc.

At one time there was a whole world of people who thought the world was flat...Kathy may hinder or help the progress of knowledge, but truth has a way of spreading to the masses--because it works! I'm not sure threats of hell can keep people from learning that which is so readily apparent to those who understand science for much longer--

Religions make people see people as evil and weak and the world as "crummy" (per Kathy)--Science shows us how very backwards this is. Humans and the planet are endlessly fascinating. The truth is better than the fairytales by
far. Kathy may "need" to believe in the heaven in she's been "working" for all her life--but younge people can have a chance to enjoy and explore THIS world.
 
In fairness to the Jesuits, however, they've tended to produce more than their fair share of exceptional reasoners.


Your point is a good one, and presents a real challenge to mine. I would say two things about the Jesuits. First that their apparent competence in reasoning has more to do with dilligence then with natural development of ability. They have learned, through hard study, to use the methodology of reason in a way that is selective to the point of being intellectually dishonest, in order to propogate irrational proposals. Second, that their effectiveness has more to do with their ability to play from both sides of the fence then with their specific competence in reason. Their characteristic style of argument is to slip back and forth between appeals to reason and appeals to emotion (fear and desire). When done skillfully this is very difficult to argue against, but it is not so by virtue of being exceptional reasoning.
 
I'm not sure about IQ, but, ceteris paribus, religiosity does not appear to go down as education goes up. (See, e.g., this post and this one.)

Yes. There is a stronger correllation to I.Q.--but I want to have hope for the masses. Wikipedia has an article on I.Q. and religiosity...and I know that Mensa and other I.Q. based groups have a majority that fall under the umbrella: humanist, freethinker, atheist, non-religous, agnostic, etc.
 
Your point is a good one, and presents a real challenge to mine. I would say two things about the Jesuits. First that their apparent competence in reasoning has more to do with dilligence then with natural development of ability. They have learned, through hard study, to use the methodology of reason in a way that is selective to the point of being intellectually dishonest, in order to propogate irrational proposals. Second, that their effectiveness has more to do with their ability to play from both sides of the fence then with their specific competence in reason. Their characteristic style of argument is to slip back and forth between appeals to reason and appeals to emotion (fear and desire). When done skillfully this is very difficult to argue against, but it is not so by virtue of being exceptional reasoning.

And the onion illustrates it so brilliantly....

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512

Jews in America show above-average intelligence as a group--but they are also more likely to carry certain recessive traits. Both are attributed to the founder effect --the jews who survived the holocaust and migrated to America had greater intelligence and carried copies the same recessive genes.

In my own experience, there seems to be a large number of people who consider themselves jewish by culture and genetics, but secular in their beliefs.
 

Back
Top Bottom