• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The Global Obesity Epidemic

Scientists Unveil a Disturbing Glimpse of the Average Person in 2050 (Newsweek, Oct 31, 2025)
"There's so much that can be done on the policy side to aid increased physical activity in communities," WeWard CEO Yves Benchimol told Newsweek.
"That could include building more pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, prioritizing parks and green spaces, incentivizing walking programs/clubs, supporting digital tools that push for positive habit formation over mindless doom-scrolling and overall greater education on the benefits of walking," he added.
"Movement really is medicine, and yet it's incredibly under-discussed."
 
Trump strikes deal to lower cost of weight loss drugs (NBC News, Nov 6, 2025)
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly said they've agreed to sell their blockbuster drugs Wegovy and Zepbound at a discount.
President Donald Trump said Thursday his administration has reached an agreement with drugmakers Novo Nordisk and Eli Lillyto lower the cost of their blockbuster GLP-1 weight loss drugs, Wegovy and Zepbound, respectively.
Under the deal, the monthly out-of-pocket cost of the drugs could range from $50 to $350, depending on the dosage and insurance coverage, a senior administration official said.
 
Another study shows low income linked to unhealthier food choices.



I think part of this is just that fruit and vegetables are low in calories and don't satiate hunger. Highly processed foods also last longer compared to fruit and vegetables so they're better "value" for your dollar.

A bowl of spaghetti with pasta sauce is just as satiating as a bowl of spaghetti with pasta sauce and a $5 bag of spinach added (that they can't afford), so they do without the spinach.
 
Another study shows low income linked to unhealthier food choices.
I think part of this is just that fruit and vegetables are low in calories and don't satiate hunger.
I don't think that's true. On the contrary, actually: The point is that you can get satiety earlier from some kinds of food that are low in calories, so you stop eating sooner than if you eat other food higher in calories that makes you feel full later, so you continue eating those beyond the point when you have consumed enough calories.
Highly processed foods also last longer compared to fruit and vegetables so they're better "value" for your dollar.
A bowl of spaghetti with pasta sauce is just as satiating as a bowl of spaghetti with pasta sauce and a $5 bag of spinach added (that they can't afford), so they do without the spinach.
Refrigeration can make most (not all) fruits and vegetables last longer. In fact, replacing candy with fruit is a way of lowering your intake of calories: Sweet like candy, but high in fiber and lower in calories.
However, if you're living paycheck to paycheck, you may think of the last time you had to throw out bananas, apples or other fresh produce that was no longer edible. If you're rich, that won't bother you much.
The same thing rarely happens with candy bars.
 
A lot is education.
You have to teach children early on ( as soon as they are weaned ) to eat grapes/apples/whatever instead of candy bars.
You don't bring sugar drinks into the house. They shouldn't be a choice.

Parents use sugar based food and drinks as pacifiers. " Here's a glass of Kool Aid and a Snickers . Leave me alone."
 
When I grew up, sugar drinks and candy were something we would have on Saturdays. I enjoyed it, and I wouldn't want to see it gone, like: "You don't bring sugar drinks into the house."
I don't see the problem with that. It only becomes a problem when it's an everyday occurrence, which it often becomes when you are poor and uneducated. Especially poor because sugar drinks are much cheaper than milk and fruit juice nowadays.
I would also hate to see chocolate and ice cream gone,the former in particular, but it should be enjoyed in moderation and be a quality product.
 
The economics of an obesity drug:
How Denmark OUTPLAYED the U.S.—Using Ozempic as Economic Leverage (House of El on YouTube, Nov 10, 2025 - 10:27 min.)
00:00 Introduction
00:49 From Diabetes Aid to Global Sensation
02:28 A GDP Fuelled Frenzy
03:57 American Demand Fuels the Boom
06:04 Is It Healthy Growth?
08:03 Challenges Ahead: Competition and Cooling Growth
09:24 Reflections

5:26--> It's an odd feedback loop. A US public health crisis, the obesity epidemic has become one of the single biggest drivers of Denmark's national wealth. Not Lego, shockingly, although that's super cute.
The very same condition costing the US hundreds of billions in healthcare each year is in economic terms underwriting Danish prosperity. And as long as demand in the US stays red-hot, Denmark's trade balance and government tax receipts will keep riding the wave, one GLP, one injection at a time.
9:24--> So, as for that question from earlier, Who spent more per capita on Ozempic in 2023? The answer is surprisingly Denmark. Yes, the drug's home country. Despite the US driving most of the revenue in absolute terms. Danes themselves bought more of it per person.
 
Last edited:
Gary Delaney,
“My Doctor told me not to eat anything fatty. ... I asked “Like bacon or cheeseburgers?”
He replied, “No fatty, don't eat anything.”.”
 
Sådan blev mad designet til IKKE at gøre os mætte: Historiker dissekerer sultens historie (Videnskab.dk, Nov 16, 2025)
Militær og stater har brugt sult i århundreder til at vinde slag og få magt. Nu bruger fødevareindustrien den til profit, mener historiker bag ny bog.
How food was designed to NOT make us full: A historian dissects the history of hunger
For centuries, the military and nations have used hunger to win battles and get power. Now, the food industry uses it for profit, according to historian behind a new book.

On Hunger - Violence and Craving in America, from Starvation to Ozempic (University of California Press)
A free ebook version of this title is available through Luminos, University of California Press's Open Access publishing program. Visit www.luminosoa.org to learn more.
In this book, Dana Simmons explores the enduring production of hunger in US history. Hunger, in the modern United States, became a technology—a weapon, a scientific method, and a policy instrument. During the nineteenth century, state agents and private citizens colluded in large-scale campaigns of ethnic cleansing using hunger and food deprivation. In the twentieth century, officials enacted policies and rules that made incarcerated people, welfare recipients, and beneficiaries of foreign food aid hungry by design, in order to modify their behavior. With the advent of ultraprocessed foods, food manufacturers designed products to stimulate cravings and consumption at the expense of public health. Taking us inside the labs of researchers devoted to understanding hunger as a biological and social phenomenon, On Hunger examines the continuing struggle to produce, suppress, or control hunger in America.
 
ABC News Reporting on Ultra Processed Foods

ABC News' medical correspondent Dr. Darien Sutton investigated the state of America’s food supply including the consumption of ultra-processed foods and the potential risks to Americans’ health in a new "ABC News Live Prime" special "Gut Check: The Foods We Eat."

Watch the segment on ABC News Live Prime on Wednesday, Nov. 19, at 8:30 p.m.

The special also takes viewers to the world’s largest food and science exposition in Chicago, where ingredient makers pitch food companies on their latest innovations.


The authors of a Lancet paper, which was published on Tuesday, note that improving diets requires more than just a change in behavior.

Instead, they are calling for world policy reform with actions
targeting the production, marketing and consumption of ultra-processed foods, as well as improving access to health food is needed, they note.

Target the production! It's no different than a war on drugs. UPFs Are killing people of all ages. They cause millions if not billions in health care costs, while BIG Food fills their pockets.
 
And lack of exercise is killing people of all ages, too:
What the U.S. Gets Wrong About Fitness (And Europe Gets Right) (Type Ashton on YouTube, April 26, 2026 – 23:35 min.)
The US has a $45 billion fitness industry. So why are Americans more unhealthy than Europeans?
00:00 Introduction
01:47 ‘Pay to Play’: The Numbers Behind the Problem
06:20 Fitness in Europe
09:53 Google This
11: 33 Club Sport Culture
14:42 A Magic Pill?
17:38 The “Fitness Mindset” for All Stages of Life


There is more than one reason why Americans are more unhealthy than Europeans, obviously, but this is one of them.

8:53--> In EU cities, short trips are far more likely to include walking and public transport.
An EU mobility study found that in European cities, 54% of short distance trips are by private car and about 27% by walking. In contrast, a 2024 commuting analysis reported that, in the US and Canada, nearly 92% of commutes are by car with only 3.5% by active mobility.
And now, an older but a still widely cited international transport research report found that Europeans walked about 382 km per person per year versus 140 in the US and bicycled 188 km versus 40 in the US.

Europe doesn't exactly get it right. 54% of short-distance trips being by private car isn't enough. Europe just gets it a little better than the USA and Canada. Walking just slightly more than 1 km and bicycling 0.5 km per day also isn't nearly enough to stay somewhat fit.
And, as I haven mentioned several times, if infrastructure doesn't encourage walking and bicycling, few people will do it. The difference between Europe and the USA is also mentioned in the video.
 
Last edited:
And lack of exercise is killing people of all ages, too:



There is more than one reason why Americans are more unhealthy than Europeans, obviously, but this is one of them.



Europe doesn't exactly get it right. 54% of short-distance trips being by private car isn't enough. Europe just gets it a little better than the USA and Canada. Walking just slightly more than 1 km and bicycling 0.5 km per day also isn't nearly enough to stay somewhat fit.
And, as I haven mentioned several times, if infrastructure doesn't encourage walking and bicycling, few people will do it. The difference between Europe and the USA is also mentioned in the video.
Health is one of the issues I recently read in the book Life After Cars. How walkable cities are much more healthy places to live in for much of the above reasons. NotJustBikes has also done a vid on this, but he's covered about everything on walkable cities.
 
Yes, that's the point!
However, 'blame the lazy gluttonous individuals for any and all societal problems' will never run out of steam.
It's up there with 'the rich are healthy, fit and ... well ... rich because they work hard and don't succumb to unhealthy overconsumption and indolence like poor people do´.
 
Dr. Oz explains obesity in the USA: It's too easy to be sick in America.
Quack Oz wants kids to be healthy so they can be in the military (Jonathan Howard on YouTube, Feb 7, 2026 – 1 min.)
0:46--> There's a reason we're twice as obese as European counterpart countries and ten times more obese than Japan. We've made it easy to be sick in America, and this president and his secretary of health, Bobby Kennedy, they aren't tolerating it.


Easy to be sick in America! Much too easy!
'I live on the street now': how Americans fall into medical bankruptcy (The Guardian, Nov 14, 2019)
 
An interesting series of articles comparing Brits and Danes:
Ny serie: Hvad kan briterne og danskerne lære hinanden om sundhed? (Sep 1, 2026, Videnskab.dk)
New series: What can Brits and Danes learn from each other about health?

The comparison is interesting since the two countries are very much alike, the health-care systems are pretty similar, and so are the genetics of Brits and Danes, so what may account for the differences in health and obesity?

It's in Danish, but ...

Introducing our new collaboration: Health Gap – Sundhedskløften (The Conversation, Sep 1, 2026)

A New series from the Conversation UK and our Danish partner Videnskab.dk, exploring what Denmark and the UK can learn from each other about health and wellbeing.

Articles in English so far:

Denmark versus UK: which country gets more health for their money? (The Conversation, Sep 1, 2026)

Both countries offer universal healthcare, but Danes live nearly two years longer than Britons. Here’s why.

The pastry paradox: why are the Danes slimmer than Britons? (The Conversation, Sep 4, 2026)

Denmark eats more sugar than Britain and invented the Danish pastry, yet far fewer Danes are obese. What are they doing differently?

Denmark is a cycling nation, but our research shows rates are declining – here’s why (The Conversation, Sep 8, 2026)

Denmark built the bike lanes – but people are still getting in cars.

A day in the life: a look at the Danish way versus the British way (The Conversation, Sep 11, 2026)

A typical weekday in Denmark and the UK looks similar on the surface, but hour by hour, the differences tell an interesting story.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom