The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

[jeffreyw]

For those interested, I will continue working on theory. My plan is to crush the dogma and place humanity where it belongs, the 21st century.

 

[jeffreyw]

Since when are black holes zero dimensional?

The field equations are set equal to zero. A more elaborate explanation of the mess is here:


http://vixra.org/pdf/1409.0072v9.pdf


Following all of this has lead me to the belief that Mr. Hawking and Susskind were engaged in trying to accomplish anatomical impossibilities.

 

[jeffreyw]

A misconception or ignorance - Venus has no intrinsic magnetic field like Earth. Venus has a weak magnetic field induced by the solar wind.

The solar wind interacting with the outer atmosphere and extracting water is another reason that Venus as no "water oceans" - a lack of water!.

Exactly. So what explains why the surface is quiet? Venus and Earth are the same age correct? Why does one have active volcanoes and the other a geologically dead world?

One should expect they would be the same geologically speaking? How would their current orbits cause one to cool down faster... Esp since the dead world is closer to the Sun?

It is answered in the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT-_bR1k_AU

 

[jeffreyw]

27 January 2017 jeffreyw: Delusions about planets being stars cannot explain anything.
Just observing planets says nothing abut the age of the planets. Your ignorance is not an explanation of anything.

Delusions without actual evidence does explain the idiocy of "science" by YouTube video rather than publishing !

It is clear you have not read anything concerning the development of the theory. I will ignore your comments from now on and answer others. BTW I'm on the timeframe of many decades of work. Your work is striving to be quick and easy. Mine is striving to be world changing and long term. Big difference. You are no match for me. I guarantee that.

 

[jeffreyw]

Exactly what is it with youtube pundits that makes them think their car is the place to shoot a video?

Sound quality for when voice overs are made. You want echos and white noise when trying to watch vids? Exactly. I plan to make all my videos apply to the graphics vids Baz is making for me.

 

[jeffreyw]

A laudable video. Ooops!, I misspelled. It's laughable.

Laugh all you want. You'll delete your own account to cover the tracks when the time comes.

 

[jeffreyw]

Maybe for better lighting than in mom's basement?

Stay classy international skeptics!

 

[jeffreyw]

Task number 1: connect any part of it to reality.

Task number 1: connect any comment to theory

Just so you know the title of the thread is:

"The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis"

In case you missed it.

 

[jeffreyw]

Well, it's related to the average speed of the gas molecules. But you could have a very cold gas moving at a high bulk velocity.

Anyway, jefferyw, someone earlier indicated you don't accept that radioactivity is real. Is that true? I searched te thread but didn't see anything about this.

It is cherry picking on part of "Realitycheck" I assume.

As a fact it was Kelvin himself who rejected radioactivity. I was just pointing out that the greatest of scientists have rejected facts based on facts. It happens. Maybe the statement was taken out of context as are many of realitycheck's "updates".

 

[jeffreyw]

Ummmm...what?

No mass or energy loss for blackholes? None?! Have you heard of LIGO?

I have heard of LIGO. I also heard it was a large amount of something I would not hold in my hand.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1603.0127v4.pdf

FYI I am friends with Mr. Crothers. We have not been in contact for sometime now. I assume he is busy with his own internal workings. I cannot judge that, for I am not worthy.

 

[jeffreyw]

2D model gives a general idea how things happen. Looks a lot like ordinary star formation and not the idea that planets are stars.

http://www.nowykurier.com/toys/gravity/gravity.html

Well, planets are ancient stars

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 12.

 

[jeffreyw]

Please can you explain this?

How can there be 1 planet orbiting every star? Your post above shows that there's 1 star that becomes 1 planet - so a total of 1, not 2?

And without a star, how could anything be life-hosting, Earth-like and ocean covered - the planet would be frozen solid.

I've noticed that myself. It can be cleared up with the idea that stars ARE the young planets. No disks are required. The young star radiates, loses mass over billions of years, leaves the heavy material in its center...

Not going to lie I assumed this would have been obvious. If the Sun gets bombarded with iron meteorites... where does the iron go? It stays on the surface?

No way. It goes directly to the interior.

This is an enormous issue with the theory though. I've noticed that if the majority of the iron enters, it will become ionized (vaporized, then ionized) and then the ionized iron will sort based on its ionization energy. That then lead me to marklund convection... then I lost it. I was like. wow. I cannot believe astronomers have ignored this! Yet they did. Ignore. The Sun is a fusion reactor and all others are pseudoscientists! lol

I have so much work to do. Wow. Atomic age scientists have really screwed up. Bad.

 

[jeffreyw]

I doubt anything that scientific really. He just claims it doesn't exist because it contradicts his theory.
Like all his other claims his evidence is so far lacking.

My theory? This thing is referenced back to Alexander Oparin, the Soviet biologist back in 1920 when he wrote "The Origin of Life".

100 year old theory having it spot in the light, ridiculed. Figures. Stay classy and scientific "International Skeptics"! Way to progress the brand.

 

[jeffreyw]

Metamorphosis.
Kafka.
What if a man awoke one day transformed into an insect?
What if planets were really stars?

3:30 a.m.
Probably best to get more sleep.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What is this?

 

[jeffreyw]

Holy carp



That's eye-watering.

Coming from a person... who has a profile with a cartoon character.

Should I take you seriously or ignore?

 

[jeffreyw]

Holy carp



That's eye-watering.

.. is... is he just talking with himself?

This is so ridiculous, I can't even mock it anymore.

Go somewhere else then. Yet another fictional character. Your opinion is zero. Nobody even knows who you are! A prime example of someone with no courage.

 

[jeffreyw]

It makes me feel exactly how I did for the 50 years I had never heard your silly claims. Keep on plugging away with your silly ramblings, it will never amount to anything except extremely boring and fact free videos on you tube.

I would call you out, but I do not know who you are. Another shining example of the exemplary courage on this forum!

 

[jeffreyw]

I thought coming back to this forum would amount to actual work, but it has been a disappointment. Wow.

 

[jeffreyw]

Reality check is <SNIP> isn't it? Good thing. Then I'm assured to outlast him. I plan on lasting 60 more years... at his age I don't think that will be possible.

Edited by Locknar: 

Edited, breach of rule 8.

 

[MikeG]

Thought better of it........