The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

[Gord_in_Toronto]

And not a single equation or calculation?

 

[catsmate]

And not a single equation or calculation?

Mathematics is a common weakness of cranks.

 

[JJwolynski]

I haven't read all of the preceding 36 pages. Perhaps you could explain why planets are typically found in systems with lots of planets rotating in the same direction in a plane, whereas stars are more often found just in pairs, and rarely more than four, and they are not in a plane.

In stellar metamorphosis, planetary systems are flat and ordered because planets are old stars that have settled over time, while stellar systems are chaotic because stars are young and still dynamically unstable.

Sorry about Rule 6. I see catsmate isn't interested in learning anything. That stinks.

 

[JJwolynski]

And not a single equation or calculation?

Have you read Origin of Species by Charles Darwin? Not a single equation or calculation in sight. Some reflection in how science happens maybe is required.

 

[JJwolynski]

Mathematics is a common weakness of cranks.

Did you just make that up or is it an actual argument?

Edit: I just deleted what I was going to say. Damn. I'll see yall tomorrow.

 

[JJwolynski]

I just looked back at the first page of this thread and am reminded of that well known definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

You referring to me or to the people here?

 

[The Man]

Have you read Origin of Species by Charles Darwin? Not a single equation or calculation in sight. Some reflection in how science happens maybe is required.

Mathematical modeling has since been employed by biologists and mathematicians to describe evolutionary processes. It is how science happens.

Mathematics can often preclude merely speculative conjectures, as not being mathematically or even just physically possible.

Did you just make that up or is it an actual argument?

Edit: I just deleted what I was going to say. Damn. I'll see yall tomorrow.

Not made up, merely a general observation (again, how science happens) from decades of experience. While not preclusive in and of itself it denotes the tendency to deliberately avoid any mathematical analysis due to its potentially preclusive nature, as noted above

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Have you read Origin of Species by Charles Darwin? Not a single equation or calculation in sight. Some reflection in how science happens maybe is required.

But lots of examples. You have any?

 

[Pixel42]

You referring to me or to the people here?

You. But it's a fair point. Patiently pointing out elementary errors to a crank over and over again, in the hope that he will one day start paying the slightest bit of attention, also fits the definition.

 

[catsmate]

You. But it's a fair point. Patiently pointing out elementary errors to a crank over and over again, in the hope that he will one day start paying the slightest bit of attention, also fits the definition.

Number 2422 is not likely to engage constructively.

#2422: Jeffrey Wolynski

Jeffrey Wolynski is a physics crank who, despite being obscure to most people (especially scientists, his claims to be a “ top dog in astron...

americanloons.blogspot.com

 

[steenkh]

In stellar metamorphosis, planetary systems are flat and ordered because planets are old stars that have settled over time, while stellar systems are chaotic because stars are young and still dynamically unstable.

I thought that as time goes, systems with more than two stars will tend to eject the others. Do you have an explanation why your systems retain several stars until they burn out, and how some of them become moons and settle into orbits around the bigger stars, still without being ejected?

 

[EHocking]

But lots of observed examples. You have any?

Just to emphasise your point.

 

[Mojo]

Have you read Origin of Species by Charles Darwin? Not a single equation or calculation in sight. Some reflection in how science happens maybe is required.

 

[Lukraak_Sisser]

Oh gosh, I'd completely forgotten this delusion. Blast from the past.
Speaking of past, has the OP ever answered where Stars come from in his fantasy?
Or why we do not measure the loss of mass which should be happening in his world?
Or where all that mass goes?
And by what mechanism it is lost?