The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis

jeffreyw: The delusion that white dwarfs are 100,000 K and at the end of evolution

Your delusion is that white dwarfs are 100,000 kelvin and at the end of stellar evolution..
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that white dwarfs are 100,000 kelvin and at the end of stellar evolution.
White dwarfs have a low surface temperatures of a few 1000 K. Their interiors are much hotter.
The next stage of stellar evolution is black dwarf stars which are not expected to exist because the universe is not old enough.
 
jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"

Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"
The temperatures and pressures needed for fusion and the neutrino flux matching this happen at the cores of stars.
 
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"
The temperatures and pressures needed for fusion and the neutrino flux matching this happen at the cores of stars.

Repeating stuff doesn't make it true. Birthing galaxies are billions of times more energetic than all the mass-energy of a single star. You know why? Because birthing galaxies create billions of stars. You can see that in the lobes of Hercules A. Plus it doesn't require miracles as per Big Bang, when the universe was a watermelon, formed in absentia time and space.

Fact is, you are probably a creationist in disguise. A wolf in sheep clothing. You believe the universe was created by god in a big bang universe.

Present a challenge or else I won't respond anymore. This is getting old.
 
Last edited:
jeffreyw: A delusion about some "Eddington's 1920's delusion" existing

Eddington's 1920's delusion can suck it compared to radio observations.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about some "Eddington's 1920's delusion" existing.

Without you explaining your delusion more fully I can only guess at it, jeffreyw. It sounds like the delusion that Eddington was the one who worked out that stars were fusion powered. That is wrong - Arthur Eddingtonspeculated that stars were fusion powered. The details were worked out by several other scientists.
 
jeffreyw: The delusion that Hercules A is a star when it is a galaxy!

Hercules A would be his worst nightmare, where the velocities for fusion are occurring.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Hercules A is a star when it is a galaxy :eek:!
Hercules A
Hercules A is a bright astronomical radio source within the vicinity of the constellation Hercules[1] corresponding to the galaxy 3C 348.
Galaxy
The galaxy, 3C 348, is a supergiant elliptical galaxy. It is classified as type E3 to E4 of the updated Hubble-de Vaucouleurs extended galaxy morphological classification scheme. Little else is known about the galaxy.
 
Last edited:
Repeating stuff doesn't make it true.
A delusion that galaxies are stars (the stars that Eddington speculated were heated by fusion and later scientists confirmed this) needs repeating:
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about some "Eddington's 1920's delusion" existing.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Hercules A is a star when it is a galaxy :eek:!

ETA: Things irrelevant to the topic at hand makes you look to be incapable of understanding English or physics, jeffreyw.
It is stars that we have worked out to be fusion powered.
All galaxies contain billions of stars and so are more energetic than single star :eye-poppi.
A star burst galaxies is a galaxy undergoing an exceptionally high rate of star formation. "Birthing galaxies" only exist in your imagination.
Hercules A is not a star burst galaxy. It is not known creating more stars than any other galaxy.


This has nothing to do your ignorance or delusion about the Big Bang being a watermelon :jaw-dropp!
 
Last edited:
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Hercules A is a star when it is a galaxy :eek:!
Hercules A

Birthing galaxies are where fusion is occuring, not stars. Jesus. Stars are the locations for exothermic chemical reactions, and the lower energy phase transitions on plasma to gas transitions. This is why they are the energy equivalent to steaming piles of **** for their surface areas.

Oh btw I see what you did there. Requote to make it seem like I was quoted as saying that. Smart, but still dumb.
 
Last edited:
You simply cannot be serious. This is so wrong it is impossible to explain how wrong it is.

Ditto about the universe forming in absentia time and space. Tell me, if the big bang created time and space, then how did the big bang happen absent time and space?

Checkmate.

Btw. Your nebular hypothesis is a giant failure. Just letting you know before SHTF with the Kepler data. I mean, 3000 exo-worlds doing stuff that defies your brain is kinda embarrassing.
 
That is wrong, jeffreyw: You have made a crank video about Kepler 78b being "impossible". One astronomer in that Wikipedia article is quoted saying he does not know how it formed.
The idea that planets are stars is physically impossible. It is a delusion that this idea explains Kepler 78b.

A star is a young hot exoplanet/planet. It is not rocket science. Look no hands ma!!!

1. Sequoia seed (the size of the X on this screen) = the largest living creature in all the Earth's existence

2. human beings smaller than the ball on a ball point pen.... who the hell thinks of this stuff? IMPOSSIBLE!!!!

3. human space flight? fu"ck that.


you clearly don't understand the majesty of nature. Go back to flipping burgers. You don't rate here.
 
jeffreyw: A delusion that something called "birthing galaxies" exist

Birthing galaxies are where fusion is occuring, not stars.
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion that something called "birthing galaxies" exist.
Added to the delusion that only these imaginary galaxies have fusion happening and it is not in their stars!
 
Uh-huh. I'm sure that impressionable minds will bite, but that wasn't my question.



Gallileo syndrome, I gather.



Three posts to answer a single sentence question... and now it's a conspiracy theory. No one dares recognize your genius.

Galileo. Spell it correctly. Oh and btw the name is Jeffrey Wolynski. Remember it. I am going to crush all you dogmatists. I am no genius. I am an average guy. That is actually worse because it means an average guy outclassed you. Ouch.
 
Last edited:
Oh btw I see what you did there.
BTW: The subject is fusion in stars, not your delusions about galaxies.
Thus I pointed out a galaxy (Hercules A) is not a star. But your are right - this is not the delusion that a galaxy is a star - it is 2 lies:
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Hercules A is a star when it is a galaxy :eek:! is actually 2 lies:
  1. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The lie that Hercules A is an imaginary "birthing galaxy".
    Hercules A
    The galaxy, 3C 348, is a supergiant elliptical galaxy. It is classified as type E3 to E4 of the updated Hubble-de Vaucouleurs extended galaxy morphological classification scheme. Little else is known about the galaxy.

    3C 348, the galaxy at the image center, appears to be a relatively normal elliptical galaxy in visible light. When imaged in radio waves, however, plasma jets over one million light years long appear. Detailed analyses indicate that the galaxy is actually over 1,000 times more massive (approx. 1015 solar masses) than our Milky Way Galaxy, and the central black hole is nearly 1,000 times more massive (approx. 4 billion solar masses) than the black hole at our Milky Way's center, one of the largest known. The physics that creates the jets is poorly understood, with a likely energy source being matter ejected perpendicular to the accretion disc of the central black hole.[2]
  2. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The lie that Hercules A is a class of galaxy undergoing fusion when all galaxies contains stars and so all galaxies undergo fusion.

  1. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that white dwarfs are 100,000 kelvin and at the end of stellar evolution.
  2. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A video about your delusion about "Stellar Evolution" is not science.
  3. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"
  4. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about some "Eddington's 1920's delusion" existing.
  5. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion that something called "birthing galaxies" exist.
 
jeffreyw: The delusion that star is a young hot exoplanet/planet

A star is a young hot exoplanet/planet. ....
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that star is a young hot exoplanet/planet.
This was debunked months ago.

27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that biology is astronomy (Sequoia seed, humans)
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: An inane insult about human space flight ending with more insults.
 
BTW: The subject is fusion in stars, not your delusions about galaxies.
Thus I pointed out a galaxy (Hercules A) is not a star. But your are right - this is not the delusion that a galaxy is a star - it is 2 lies:
27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that Hercules A is a star when it is a galaxy :eek:! is actually 2 lies:
  1. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The lie that Hercules A is an imaginary "birthing galaxy".
    Hercules A
  2. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The lie that Hercules A is a class of galaxy undergoing fusion when all galaxies contains stars and so all galaxies undergo fusion.

  1. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that white dwarfs are 100,000 kelvin and at the end of stellar evolution.
  2. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A video about your delusion about "Stellar Evolution" is not science.
  3. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"
  4. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about some "Eddington's 1920's delusion" existing.
  5. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion that something called "birthing galaxies" exist.

Fusion happens in birthing galaxies.

The energy difference between a birthing galaxy and an entire stars mass-energy:

1. A birthing galaxy: 1.8*10^47 Joules

2. Hercules A: 3*10^54 Joules (mechanical energy only)

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove breach of rule 0 and rule 12
A birthing galaxy has tens of millions of times of mechanical energy than an entire star if that same star disintegrated all of its atomic energy down to the lowest state.


You know what that means? You need to stop wasting your time. You and all your kin can take your big bang and shove it. You have been outclassed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jeffreyw: 58 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015

Read the pit of ignorance and delusion (and some lies) you have been digging yourself deeper into: 17 June 2016 jeffreyw: 37 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015
  1. 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion from 27 December 2014 - establishment science does not have life forming on comets.
  2. 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that plasma at temperatures of stars have "electrochemical" and "redox" reactions.
  3. 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that stars are not powered by fusion (we detect the neutrinos from that fusion from the Sun!)
  4. 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: The 27 December 2014 delusion that life forms on stars - the Earth is not a star now and was not a star when life originated here.
  5. 20 June 2016 jeffreyw: Conspiracy theory fantasy about peer review.
  6. 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that stars are "big hot and bright" by tradition - it is observations and measurements that establish this.
  7. 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that planets are "small, cold and dim" by tradition - it is observations and measurements that establish this.
  8. 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: A lie that " Nobody seems to have asked the question, "what happens when stars don't shine anymore?"".
  9. 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: New stars are observed to from collapsing gas clouds, not imaginary Bennett pinches.
  10. 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: It is not difficult to understand that stars are hundreds of thousands of times heavier than planets and remain that heavy when they cool down :eek:!
  11. 21 June 2016 jeffreyw: The idiocy of labeling astronomers as "creationists" :jaw-dropp!
  12. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Does not know an implied endorsement by the ignorant crank Bill Gaede is a bad idea!
  13. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusional YouTube Video "Earth is older than the Sun!"!
  14. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that something called "establishment dogma" exists.
  15. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The delusion that white dwarfs are 100,000 kelvin and at the end of stellar evolution.
  16. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A video about your delusion about "Stellar Evolution" is not science.
  17. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about "Fusion occurs in birthing galaxies"
  18. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion about some "Eddington's 1920's delusion" existing.
  19. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: A delusion that something called "birthing galaxies" exist.
  20. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The lie that Hercules A is an imaginary "birthing galaxy".
  21. 27 June 2016 jeffreyw: The lie that Hercules A is a class of galaxy undergoing fusion when all galaxies contains stars and so all galaxies undergo fusion.
 
Fusion happens in birthing galaxies.
....
jeffreyw: 58 items of ignorance and delusion since 15th January 2015 includes your delusion about "birthing galaxies" :jaw-dropp!

27 June 2016 jeffreyw: Unable to support his idea rationally with evidence so he has to resort to gibberish and insults.
Gibberish of random numbers.
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed response to moderated content


And implies again that Hercules A is a star (making 3 lies about it?) by an idiotic comparison of
1. an imaginary "birthing galaxy" energy to
2. an "entire stars mass-energy" (Hercules A?).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom