The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont think even idiotic Yozhik can pull this one back
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=183284&page=3
I found this little 'gem' within the UCADIA Jucial Code:

http://globe-union.org/code_judicial/article_1000.htm

So according to the UCADIA 'Constitution' you have to lodge your appeal within 60 days of sentencing otherwise your' 'goose is cooked'. This wouldn't have helped poor old Mr Herrera as he came up with his 'new evidence' 8 years after he was sentenced. Seems to me Mr Herrera would have found himself in a similar predicament if his case had been dealt with in a UCADIA Court.

I suppose he could petition for mercy from the benevolent Frank O'Collins
Click to expand...

Sheer perfection :D
 
hes "mine quoted" a section of text which he no doubt picked up from another daft site and posted it without even reading the case.:rolleyes:

He actually believes in and promotes a philosophy(Ucadia) which is actually more restrictive and less lenient than the system he is critical of.

Now he seems to want to ignore everything and claim he's the victim, I find it unusual Merlincove is the one to police that thread, wheres weeman and infidelyork when you need them?
 
jargon buster said:
hes "mine quoted" a section of text which he no doubt picked up from another daft site and posted it without even reading the case.:rolleyes:

He actually believes in and promotes a philosophy(Ucadia) which is actually more restrictive and less lenient than the system he is critical of.

Now he seems to want to ignore everything and claim he's the victim, I find it unusual Merlincove is the one to police that thread, wheres weeman and infidelyork when you need them?
Click to expand...

Shame, his rant posts have disappeared.
He seemed to be a tad upset:D
 
Stacey Grove said:
Am I right in thinking that UCADIA have predicted some sort of event that will occur in December?
Click to expand...

I can field this one. I think in December 2012 Frank O'Collins 'treaty' sorting out that spot of unpleasantness between the devil & god comes into force. I'm surprised you haven't diarised it.
 
Well, unless God and the Devil contact Frank he has their silent asquiesence.
And as all good FMOTL know thats a binding contract.
Im afraid he has got them hook line and sinker.
 
I see Yozhik's backtracking now and hoping that no one will notice. He's moved from that case being an example of injustice caused by blindly following legal process to stating that legal procedure should be designed to arrive at the truth.

Urrr, yes Yozhik. So why the reference to Herrera?! Wally Badge No. 2, I think.

This could be a bumper season for badge makers.
 
I see Yozhik's backtracking now and hoping that no one will notice. He's moved from that case being an example of injustice caused by blindly following legal process to stating that legal procedure should be designed to arrive at the truth.
Click to expand...
Yozhik wrote
I embrace procedure and consistent process.
That is wholly consistent with "equality".
My 'beef' is the artificial elevation of process to a point where in extreme situations, it becomes the primary focus: where form is regarded as superior to substance.My point - the purpose of starting this thread - is that consistent procedure or "administrative process" is absolutely required, but it should never be the primary goal of a legal system. The 'truth' and justice which include what is morally right, incorporating the conscience, should ALWAYS be the primary focus.
Click to expand...
I hope someone asks him for evidence that its the case, apart from his cherrypicked quote which when taken in its true context actually poo poos his point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom