• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Disclosure Project

CJOKUSAP said:
Great to see the usual rational, bias-free, totally objective, free-thinking and highly imaginative thought processes that go on around here guys.
Click to expand...

This is not a subject dealing with art where one gets to see whatever their imagination will allow. This is a subject dealing in fact and evidence.

And I've still not had one sincere reply. Do you people really want to learn new things in life, or are you just trying to keep a monopoly on the "How It All Works" manuals?
Click to expand...

And the entire truth movement has still not put together a significant march/demonstration to demand the truth. What's your point?
 
Are you happy with a government that has a "Plausible Denial" get-out clause in it's rule-book?
 
Post#6

CJOK (banned) said:
Well, I may not have made up the quote steronz, but I must have imagined the
"Googling it to no avail" bit! I`ve just tried it[again?], and I am amazed how many
references there are to it. Honest, I could have swore when I tried it, nothing
came up! Saying that, when I was trying to access this post earlier, my laptop
switched itself off 3 times while I was trying to type a reply!! Now, what`s that
all about, eh? Spooky or not, it`s not half as scary as the implications of that
Directive. If they were thinking like that back in `48, how much more devious
are they going to be now?
Click to expand...

Post #7

CJOK (banned) said:
Answer. Lots!
Click to expand...

answering your own messages and paranoid rants?

what did you get banned for?

wasting people times with inane and cryptic questions?

The CIA are very sneaky bad men, was this a shock to you? is it a shock the goivt would not want to be blamed for their failures?
 
So you don't think that little section has been revised and updated since then? "It was suitable to use at that particular time, but it's served it's purpose and we don't use it or even need it any more."
I don't believe you are that dumb to accept the "reply" in bold, so what really is your ****ing game then? Or maybe you just are that ****ing dumb! Convince me otherwise.

Stop using personal attacks. You will be suspended again, or banned, if you cannot.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Keep in mind that conjecture can be a tool to help formulate the best line of an investigation also!
 
Have you people not realized that there is a chance here to push for real transparency in the forces that dictate the way our lives are governed?
 
CJOKUSAP said:
Have you people not realized that there is a chance here to push for real transparency in the forces that dictate the way our lives are governed?
Click to expand...
Ahem. I know you'd like to be addressing a small amphitheater of attentive debunkers, but it's just me here. Have you not realized that the opportunity to push for transparency has always existed?
 
CJOKUSAP said:
Is that it my funky friend? Your measured, fully considered response?

Typical D'uh Bunker's, if you can't attack the fact , attack the person! It's getting very old hat now, guys. Still no honest, off-the-record answer to my question though, I notice.
Click to expand...

It does not bother me one bit, cause I am not American - On the record

Govts do sneaky things, all governments, they do not want to get caught doing it if the people carrying out the ops are discovered.

Now what was your fact and what was the point in it?

Have you had a drink tonight?
 
funk de fino said:
It does not bother me one bit, cause I am not American - On the record
Click to expand...
Well, it should bother you. What they do affects the world. If it was just American's at risk, I wouldn't give a **** either.
funk de fino said:
Govts do sneaky things, all governments, they do not want to get caught doing it if the people carrying out the ops are discovered.
Click to expand...
And you're happy with that then , are you? Well I'm not.
funk de fino said:
Now what was your fact and what was the point in it?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't have thought you'd be that interested.
funk de fino said:
Have you had a drink tonight?
Click to expand...
Not a one. Have you?
 
CJOKUSAP said:
Well, it should bother you. What they do affects the world. If it was just American's at risk, I wouldn't give a **** either.
Click to expand...
How very nationalistic of you.

And you're happy with that then , are you? Well I'm not.
Click to expand...
That's incredibly naive and paranoid.

CJOKUSAP said:
Next!
Click to expand...
Next what? You've made no point, and keep asking a poorly worded question that you believe will score some kind of points, if answered, in a game that only you are playing.

Try to break the question down in such a way that:
1. Watching the video is unnecessary.
2. It's not only a "yes" or "no" answer. You learn more that way.
3. If you wish to cover multiple topics, ask multiple questions. The answers will be more precise that way.
4. Avoid asking for an answer to a question that can only exist in a hypothetical situation, especially an improbable one. People are often unwiling to concede a point that could only happen in a fantasy.

Don't assume that a non-answer is a concession. It may be that your question is poorly worded and not understood, or people are formulating a response that will answer it more clearly. Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
 
Last edited:
CJOKUSAP said:
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. Go away, ostrich!

p.s. You are not worthy of Columbo's name. Hand it back.
Click to expand...
You do know that Columbo is a fictional character. Right?

Columbo asked questions and gathered evidence before he made blind accusations. The one time he did, he turned out to be wrong.

Since you are unable to put your point in your own words and produce sources to prove that you've done any independent research, I see little reason to be interested in anything you write. You're just another cut-and-paste "twoofer" sheeple, who can't form a thought on his/her own, and not a very good one. You are boring.
 
CptColumbo said:
How very nationalistic of you.

That's incredibly naive and paranoid.


Next what? You've made no point, and keep asking a poorly worded question that you believe will score some kind of points, if answered, in a game that only you are playing.

Try to break the question down in such a way that:
1. Watching the video is unnecessary.
2. It's not only a "yes" or "no" answer. You learn more that way.
3. If you wish to cover multiple topics, ask multiple questions. The answers will be more precise that way.
4. Avoid asking for an answer to a question that can only exist in a hypothetical situation, especially an improbable one. People are often unwiling to concede a point that could only happen in a fantasy.

Don't assume that a non-answer is a consession. It may be that your question is poorly worded and not understood, or people are formulating a response that will answer it more clearly. Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
Click to expand...

It's concession actually.
 
Gravy said:
Ahem. I know you'd like to be addressing a small amphitheater of attentive debunkers*, but it's just me here. Have you not realized that the opportunity to push for transparency has always existed?**
Click to expand...

*No I wouldn't , I'm very shy! ** You mean since the FOIA was created? You are far too trusting, my no-friend.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom