And now( In this thread at least!) it's getting it's arse kicked by a dole-ite!
The Disclosure Project
- Thread starter star.logic
- Start date
And now( In this thread at least!) it's getting it's arse kicked by a dole-ite!
8den
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 1,293
Yes and Yes, an do you have proof of the third statement?
I call this "CJs Theory of Inferred Logic". Do you think it's a catchy label , or what?
Yes, but for all you, or anybody else knows...you could be right. Statistically.
For anyone who has come in late , can I just clarify something? I am not a "twoofer conspiracist", I am a "9/11 Hobbyist" like most of you. I have no ulterior motive than a genuine concern for the future safety of my brothers, little nephew, mum and dad, my dog...etc. And it's not terrorists that I worry about. I am from Manchester, a city familiar with terrorism, although not on the scale you were unlucky enough to go through. So, be careful with any insults you are thinking of aiming at me.
same city as Pdoherty76...interesting...you two should meet up...share a beer.TAM
It might be interesting to you TAM, but it means nothing to me. For one...I'm not a big fan of beer( I must be strange, eh?). And two, I'm not interested in making alliances, just having my views expressed!
Just in case you missed this earlier!Well guys and gals, I'm back and guess what...I've got no 'facts' whatsoever. But I don't think the majority of punters I have met on this forum thus far , would deserve something as precious as a 'fact' anyway. All you do with them is mold and twist them into whatever shape suits your purpose. I am only stating my experience up to this time. I'm not saying everyone on here does it, but the ones that do will know who I mean, and anyway, let's just see who turns up to debunk me.l
So, the Disclosure Project! I only came across this video very recently, and checking through this thread, no-one seems to think there is anything at all significant about this event. I can't believe you all really have that little imagination to connect the dots between this and the events of 9/11.
On May the 9th, 2001 , a press event is staged indicating there may be sufficient evidence to gain a Congressional Hearing in front of...just how many press agencies were involved? Whatever your personal opinions may be, as the guy out of "Knott's Landing" said, if only one of the thousands of recorded cases turns out to be genuine , the whole debunking community will be left with egg on it's face , and how keen are you lot on that happening? And don't kid me this is an "educational" forum at heart. There is far too much of a personal slant taken in some of the attacks I have seen on a persons views. Your overall credibility as suppliers of informative answers doesn't look good from where I am sat and I am giving you a chance to rectify that by answering two questions without your personal bias being brought into it.
1. If the claims in this video were proven to be true, would you accept that as possible motivation for a 'shadow government agency' (And don't say where's the facts. That's the whole ****ing point of them!) to set up the stage for 9/11. Because if you don't think it looked like a blockbuster disaster movie, then I'm not listening to another word you say. Give us a shout when you've got something interesting, intelligent and pertinent to my query to add!
BTW. My comments above do not include Dave in the previous post!
well your demeanor is very similar to his...must be a Manchester thing.
TAM
I can't even be bothered checking to see what you mean. You know what my research skills are like!
I did miss it, and will continue to do so, until someone else here, someone I trust, announces that you actually have something new and/or valid to bring to the discussion table.
TAM
Oh, it's like that then , is it? So, it is valid for members to cast doubt on the veracity of witnesses, but another member cannot attempt to cast doubt on the doubter, if you get my drift? Do you want to try giving a honest, sincere AND considered reply to this question, or are you just going to continue to waffle?
If the claims in this video were proven to be true, would you accept that as possible motivation for a 'shadow government agency' (And don't say where's the facts. That's the whole ****ing point of them!) to set up the stage for 9/11.
8den
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 1,293
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Are you asking for a hypothetical answer to a hypothetical situation?
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
How does being a skeptic make me insincere? You want to know if it's possible for me to believe something that I don't believe to be possible (shadow gov.).
Well, according to this definition - Skepticism (British spelling: Scepticism) can mean:* Philosophical skepticism - a philosophical position in which people choose to critically examine whether the knowledge and perceptions that they have are actually true, and whether or not one can ever be said to have absolutely true knowledge; or * Scientific skepticism - a scientific, or practical, position in which one questions the veracity of claims, and seeks to prove or disprove them using the scientific method.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism ...it seems you already doubt you have the necessary qualities for this -"Sincerity is the virtue of speaking truly about one's feelings, thoughts, desires. Sincere expression carries risks to the speaker, since the ordinary screens used in everyday life are opened to the outside world. At the same time, we expect our friends, our lovers, our leaders "to be sincere.""[/B]
I was going to say that!