• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Disclosure Project

So, the members of this forum are supposed to do your research for you?

Look into it yourself, and come back with what you discover. Present you findings in a straight forward manner. Cite your sources and those who care will look at it.

Otherwise you come across as just another cut and paste close-minded "Twoof" movement sheeple. Which is not new here and very boring. If you continue to just post links to google videos, you will probably be ignored by most of the forum, since members get bored with typing information over and over again to someone who can't take the time to search the forum (which you seem to have no problem doing) to see if the topic has been discussed before.

Don't let others do your thinking for you, at the sites you posted or here. Look into it for yourself.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Well, here's a blast from the past!

Whatever happened to good ol' star dot logic?
Click to expand...
I think a UFO from the OP took him away and sent back CJ!? What do you think.?

The UFO video is worthless and the product of idiots.
 
Last edited:
Beachnut said:
Reason: maybe star.logic forgot his name and password and had to come back as cj
Click to expand...

That's an interesting explanation, Beachnut. Certainly more interesting than my musing that Pdoh had forgotten the password of a sock puppet.
 
So, I've been wondering. If Fantasia were true - now just hypothetically, of course. If it was true, would this shake your beliefs in your own logic and might you have to re-examine the events surrounding the sinking of the General Belgrano? Hmm? It is well known (in a conspiracy I just pulled out of my nether regions, but which Rense will cover any day, now, I'm certain) that the Belgrano was actually piloted by Eva Peron because a local indian tribe had found a cure for cancer and the giant pharmas controlled by the Illuminati paid the British to sink it. Many have said this theory is nonsense.... but if it proved that hippos could actually dance in tutus, wouldn't that make you rethink your position on the complicity of the NWO in the sinking of the Belgrano?

If... I say. Just "if". The fact that none of you supposed sceptics will address this speaks volumes as to your own misgivings. I'm sure Kraft-Ebbing would have something interesting to say on the topic. If....
 
Foolmewunz said:
So, I've been wondering. If Fantasia were true - now just hypothetically, of course. If it was true, would this shake your beliefs in your own logic and might you have to re-examine the events surrounding the sinking of the General Belgrano? Hmm? It is well known (in a conspiracy I just pulled out of my nether regions, but which Rense will cover any day, now, I'm certain) that the Belgrano was actually piloted by Eva Peron because a local indian tribe had found a cure for cancer and the giant pharmas controlled by the Illuminati paid the British to sink it. Many have said this theory is nonsense.... but if it proved that hippos could actually dance in tutus, wouldn't that make you rethink your position on the complicity of the NWO in the sinking of the Belgrano?

If... I say. Just "if". The fact that none of you supposed sceptics will address this speaks volumes as to your own misgivings. I'm sure Kraft-Ebbing would have something interesting to say on the topic. If....
Click to expand...

That's right Foolmewonze, "IF", one of the smallest but most important words in any dictionary you care to mention.
I'm glad you've noticed the significance of it, because "IF" any of the 'cast iron assertions' you make on this forum "are" wrong, the implications are terrifying. But, you all seem happy with the way things are being done, so hey, we all must be wrong! "FALSE!";)
 
In fact, who's the site statistician? What "are" the chances that "you" are ALL right, and "we" are ALL wrong? Anybody know that one?

p.s. Explanations in layman's terms, please!
 
Last edited:
CJOKUSAP said:
In fact, who's the site statistician? What "are" the chances that "you" are ALL right, and "we" are ALL wrong? Anybody know that one?

p.s. Explanations in layman's terms, please!
Click to expand...
One gazillion to zero.

In laymen's terms: You are all wrong. Completely, unequivocally wrong.











Oh wait, I forgot the carry the one in my equation:

One gazillion and ten to zero. :p
 
Drudgewire said:
One gazillion to zero.

In laymen's terms: You are all wrong. Completely, unequivocally wrong.
Oh wait, I forgot the carry the one in my equation:
One gazillion and ten to zero. :p
Click to expand...

Now can I see the 'working out' you did? I'm sure it will be very detailed and full of intricate little figures that my primitive brain would not fathom, but I can pass it on to my 'expert' who'll see if you're talking crap, or not!;)
 
I spotted your reluctance to use the #1. Can you have a to zero set of odds? I'm very dubious.
 
Hmm? No kittens allowed. No recipes allowed.

May I propose, then, a boycott of this ridiculous thread and the trollish JAQing of CJOK. CJOK had his/her chance over in the questions thread, struck out mightily, so has reverted to this jabberwocky.

I'm outta here!
 
Coward!

p.s. Don't call me a hi-JAQ-er!

Please remember to attack the argument not the arguer.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yet another truther who’s become overwhelmingly upset.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom