The case against Dr. Paul

Pardalis said:
There are dozens of threads about Ron Paul already, with many people giving their best opinions about him. Again, what's the point of this one?
Click to expand...


I see you really dislike parliaments ... :D
Anyway - the point of this one was the current
debate about economics. (Which Paul is pointing
out all of the time)

So far, we had racism, "nutism", homosexuality
and those rather unrelated issues some Americans
love to distract to rather than admitting that Paul
is right about the economy.

But I have all patience in the world to see how
the Dollar sinks even deeper until people will
wake up and see that Paul might not be the Nut
the Media tried to portray.

And if the UHC will come into policy, people will
wake up even sooner - so I hope that the Democrats
win to wake up America about the system they
live in and that no matter if you choose Apple or
Orange, it isn't going to get better.

But living in a UHC-Parliamentary system as well,
you surely know the struggle on those issues...
 
WildCat said:
That's only because Ron Paul supporters keep posting in them.
Click to expand...


Just out of curiosity - is there anything you could agree
with Paul? - Something that makes more sense than what
the other stances we hear from the other candidates?
 
I have to leave for the moment, but I trust Oliver will continue to easily crush your illogical hate-filled arguments while I'm away.
 
Richard Masters said:
Do you expect Ron Paul supporters to ignore a high-traffic thread full of lies?

And then you blame the existence of said threads on them?
Click to expand...


Funny thing is - many in here show much more
skills in the "Conspiracy Theories"-Subforum - but
somehow fall to the "Truthers" POV within the
politics-subforum.

Maybe an agenda-based thingy - but it's certainly
far away from the intention of Mr. James Randi.
 
Billdave2 said:
You mean like the truth of how Paul is against earmarks and how he votes against spending bills, yet he puts earmarks for his constituants in spending bills? But I guess it is OK since even though he put it there he votes against it, since it is going to pass anyway. That is some real straight talkin' there!
Click to expand...

The money will spent either way, we've already covered this. This is a defacto catch 22, a flaw in the system.
 
Billdave2 said:
So you see no problem with "playing the system" to get earmark money, and then taking a stand against it. Haveing his cake and eating it(and other peoples') too. Yeah, that is a real ethical, stand up guy. Forget President, lets make him King!
Click to expand...

It's called principle! Pray tell, what other options are there?

This should be interesting!
 
Drudgewire said:
Both Huck and RP have been campaigning since long before December. One got support from people that can actually vote, one got support from people who like to act like oafs in public and on the Internet and make his candidacy look crazier than his policies or newsletters do.

And regardless of how anyone else moved up or down the ladder, Paul has remained entrenched on the bottom rung. That's what happens in a "free country" to candidates who the vast majority of people don't want to vote for.
Click to expand...

Hello? Nevada!

$1.85 Million raised yesterday.

Plus the virtual media blackout against RP, I'd say he's doing quite well!
 
JEROME DA GNOME said:
This is not much of an argument. Primary school level if you ask anyone beyond the middle school level.
Click to expand...


pauladnovitatemsi0.jpg
 
Richard Masters said:
:dl:

Oliver keeps owning you and you can't raise any significant arguments.
Click to expand...

There must be hundreds of Ron Paul threads where, to varying degrees non-Paul supporters have made detailed arguments only to be rebutted by the same tired lines the Jerome-Oliver tag team uses in nearly every post. There's no incentive to argue with these two other than humor, which is exactly what the Ron Paul forum has become. Yes most of the anti-Paul post are frivolous but it reflects the quality of discussion the opposition has offered. In post #71 I offered proof of Paul's affiliation with known conspiracy theorist, neo-confederates and Christian fundies only to be rebutted with Paul is less worse than Bush!

There are a few intelligent, libertarian minded posters here but it's no surprise to me that they generally steer clear of the Paul babblers. In a larger sense this is also why libertarians at Reason and Cato have been quietly distancing themselves from Paul as well over the past few months, much to the dismay and frustration of his supporters. Once you start digging into Paul you quickly find the alleged pillar of ethics and constitutionality is little more than a paper tiger.
 
Oliver said:
You may have noticed that I started the thread out
of the current economic developments:
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter, that's not what you asked. People have answered your OP, and again you're trying to change the subject because you don't like contradictory opinions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom