The "Carlos Swett affair"

[Pyrrho]

Ahem. Carlos, at this time I would guess that Randi no longer gives a damn.

http://www.creakyjoints.com/graphics/

 

[Guest]

THE ABC IS ON ACTION

Ahem. Carlos, at this time I would guess that Randi no longer gives a damn.

http://www.creakyjoints.com/graphics/

Hi member of ABC:

Is he afraid?Can be man enough to put that in words with his sign on it?

I Carlos Swett , I am not afraid, I told him FIRST directly to HIM that HE is a CHICKEN and a LOSER(in my case), that he has a poor - liar researcher like Andrew Harter, that they (both) used the most stupid method to analize the tape, THAT THEY NEVER TOLD ME THAT MY APPLICATION WAS NOT VALID, and that don't be worry for the MONEY, that the main reason is to find the TRUTH.

See the difference? I AM FRONTAL.

If all Randi's commentaries at SWIFT are about charlatans, IDIOTS, trolls and similars, WHY I am not there?

Randi : When are you going to put my notarized application and the poor answer you gave me, with your sign on it?
What are you afraid of?

Thanks.
S&S (Carlos Swett)

 

[Hellbound]

Let the record show that S&S aka Carlos Swett has again refused to make use of the address I provided, has asserted that it is not his responsibility to prove the claim he put forth or to provide evidence of it, and has resorted to simple name-calling and stalling tactics.

At this point, I will edit my previous post to remove my address. It is still available to him should he choose to use it.

 

[RichardR]

Does S&S stand for Stubborn & Stupid? Simple & Shitforbrains? You have NOTHING. Repeating the same old crap ad infinitum doesn't make it valid. Go away you moron - it's over.

 

[Guest]

Read and understand

Let the record show that S&S aka Carlos Swett has again refused to make use of the address I provided, has asserted that it is not his responsibility to prove the claim he put forth or to provide evidence of it, and has resorted to simple name-calling and stalling tactics.

At this point, I will edit my previous post to remove my address. It is still available to him should he choose to use it.

Hi Huntman:

I already answered you. Is not my fault if you did not understand, my email is : [email protected] . I don´t have nothing to hide. I am really glad of your curiosity, is one of the few persons of this thread who is not worried if my application was valid or not.
That's the key of the question: see the complete unedited shot(the same that was transmmited live)

But I am going to remind you what I told you before:

"Who are you ? an initial? a nick name?
I gave you a tip: ask JREF FOR MY TAPE, is mine and I am giving you my permission(CARLOS SWETT) to receive it in my name, besides the "amazing duo" are in silence about my application.


But that's not the big point : you are correct, THAT IS THE WAY or the correct method to analize the image: PROFFESIONAL EQUIPMENTS.
I did it that way, HARTER DID NOT See now the difference?

But you are still failing in one point: "digitize the tape".
Is that a proof? I did it , too.
Rwald did it too ,BUT INSERT ON IT "HIS GALLOW HUMOR", so a digitize tape can be tricked.
The ONLY (unlest you recomend another)way is to go to your nearest tv station, ask for THEIR TAPE of the same shot and analize it with their own tv equipments. My tape is just a reference of the COMPLETE SEQUENCE, as I told JREF.

Who are you?Are you afraid of what?"

You have my private e-mail now

Thanks (and I mean it)
S&S

 

[rwald]

Why should the JREF send Huntsman a copy of the tape? It's your claim. You need to prove it. The JREF has no responsibility in this matter.

And for the upteenth time, I agree that my "gallows humor" proved that a digital version of the tape can be corrupted. But still, if Huntsman had a full, 30-frame-per-second copy of the tape we could all look at, we could make some general assumptions from it. You could tell us if it were corrupted in any major way.

rwald
Corresponding Secretary of the Association of Brilliant Chaps

 

[Guest]

RANDI'S VOICE again

Why should the JREF send Huntsman a copy of the tape? It's your claim. You need to prove it. The JREF has no responsibility in this matter.

And for the upteenth time, I agree that my "gallows humor" proved that a digital version of the tape can be corrupted. But still, if Huntsman had a full, 30-frame-per-second copy of the tape we could all look at, we could make some general assumptions from it. You could tell us if it were corrupted in any major way.

rwald
Corresponding Secretary of the Association of Brilliant Chaps

Hi Rwald(again):

Are You the official voice of Randi or the JREF?

You are just the secretary of ABC(ASSIOCIATION of Brainless Clowns).

Randi and Harter's answer ARE ALREADY CORRUPTED.

They used the incomplete INTERNET video to make a study and gave me a CORRUPTED ANSWER.
Is a fact.

Let Huntsman make his own decissions, he is smarter than you.
You are just a Randi's beleiver.

Thanks,
S&S

 

[RichardR]

Re: RANDI'S VOICE again

Hi Rwald(again):

Are You the official voice of Randi or the JREF?

You are just the secretary of ABC(ASSIOCIATION of Brainless Clowns).

Randi and Harter's answer ARE ALREADY CORRUPTED.

They used the incomplete INTERNET video to make a study and gave me a CORRUPTED ANSWER.
Is a fact.

Let Huntsman make his own decissions, he is smarter than you.
You are just a Randi's beleiver.

Thanks,
S&S

(Chews carrot.) What a maroon.

 

[Guest]

Now, "THE RABBIT"

(Chews carrot.) What a maroon.

Hi RichardR:

Joining the ABC? ......That's all ? insults?

I have seen some kinds of animals talking at this thread.The rabbit was missing.

I saw also Randi speaking through or using your secretary Rwald.

I am still waiting for HIM. I am not hurry.
Time is on my side.

Don't waste your time here , you are missing "the Looneytoons".

Thanks,
S&S

 

[Shaun from Scotland]

Re: Now, "THE RABBIT"

Hi RichardR:

Joining the ABC? ......That's all ? insults?

I have seen some kinds of animals talking at this thread.The rabbit was missing.

I saw also Randi speaking through or using your secretary Rwald.

I am still waiting for HIM. I am not hurry.
Time is on my side.

Don't waste your time here , you are missing "the Looneytoons".

Thanks,
S&S

Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn...................

Wheres my lapel badge by the way?

 

[Pyrrho]

To All Skeptics On This Thread

Folks, it is clear that Carlos will continue with the same arguments, insults, etc.

I suggest that we all abandon this thread. It serves no purpose other than to provide a platform for Carlos to spew endlessly.

As a Brilliant Chap, I'm smart enought to know when I'm dealing with the impossible.

So, I'm done with this jerk.

Don't feed the troll...

 

[Shaun from Scotland]

Re: To All Skeptics On This Thread

Folks, it is clear that Carlos will continue with the same arguments, insults, etc.

I suggest that we all abandon this thread. It serves no purpose other than to provide a platform for Carlos to spew endlessly.

As a Brilliant Chap, I'm smart enought to know when I'm dealing with the impossible.

So, I'm done with this jerk.

Don't feed the troll...

Does that mean we are going to disband?

Sniff, its the end of an era...its been great guys......sob

 

[Guest]

Re: NO COMMENTS ABOUT SWETT, WHY???

Randi`s comments on the forum: Friday 27, September

Please read.... This is Randi (09-27-2002 until 10-28-2002)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys, this is Randi - on Linda's nickel.

I don't get the time to check in here, but when I do, I'm pretty annoyed at some of what's going on. I refer to matters of good taste and consideration.

One example is "Franko." I've read posts in which half of his modifiers are vulgar and obscene. This doesn't shock me, because I take it as an indication that Franko just doesn't have the ability to express himself in more acceptable language, but it does annoy me, especially when I realize that others may be shocked and may resent it.

The LAST thing we want to do is to censor this forum. We also want to avoid the necessity of throwing anyone off. However, we may have to do some housekeeping if the situation continues as it is presently. PLEASE don't make this necessary.

We're about to post (or is it already up?) a set of guidelines that we believe to be very reasonable and acceptable. It's common sense: you're welcome here, to exchange ideas and thoughts --- but good manners and thoughtfulness count. Arguing can be done reasonably and soberly, without being nasty or cruel. We must do just that.

An added thought, while I have the floor: it seems to me that if someone avers that he or she simply "believes" something to be true or false, why should you spin your wheels carrying on that there's no "proof" for the belief? Blind belief, in my opinion, is dangerous and illogical, but that's one of the things we stand for: freedom of thought and belief. Disagree as much as we might, anyone can believe that God is a cabbage, lives in Duluth, and speaks French. We have to accept that statement of belief, though we may not endorse it. BUT: if that person states that he or she can PROVE it, let the fur fly.

Let's try to remember: "I believe this to be true, as a matter of faith, without any supporting evidence" is a statement that just can't be argued with; yes, you can argue with the logic of HAVING this kind of belief, but if it's "blind," it's unassailable.

That's just a suggestion to those who enter into fruitless harangues with persons who are satisfied and content with their beliefs. Wheel-spinning is a waste of intellect and time, in my opinion.

Oops. Been on too long. Just haven't the time to spend here, and I'm sorry that I won't be able to answer responses or comments on the above. Just not enough time. And you might consider sparing Jeff much of the avalanche of comments....?

I assume that EVERYONE here is going to be with us in January for the Amazing Meeting.....?

Make nice, folks.

James Randi.

Rwald and Patricio Elicer about Randi`s comments on the radio: Thursday 26, September:

Speaking of the "amazing silence"...

Last night, I emailed Randi's radio show about Carlos Swett. Randi mocked Carlos, and said, "Carlos, you're wrong, you're an idiot." He also commented that if Carlos had above a 3rd grade reading level, he might have been able to understand the rules. Now, I agree that Randi was insulting Carlos. There's no question about that. The key point is, Randi certainly was not silent about Carlos. So, all of Carlos's arguments about Randi's silence are completely unfounded.

Just like all the rest of Carlos's arguments.

rwald
Corresponding Secretary of the Association of Brilliant Chaps


Thanks rwald for clarifying that point. I heard Randi's response, but I kept wondering about who sent the e-mail

Patricio Elicer


Who are the liars and the chickens??????????????????????????????????????????????

 

[Skeptoid]

Awww shucks. I came late to the game and Carlos hasn't called me a clown yet. But it would be an interesting experiment to see if a troll in the wild begins to talk to himself when abandoned. That'll be the working hypothesis. The only control this little experiment needs is self-control. In the interest of science, don't feed the troll and let's sit back and see what happens.

 

[Guest]

Is this true, or another liar??

Randi`s page:



The Foundation is committed to providing reliable information about paranormal claims. It both supports and conducts original research into such claims.

 

[CSSMariner]

I ran into Senor Carlos_Swett in the Chat Room this week, and he claimed he was coming to the Amazing Meeting. With such nuts around we may have to look into beefing up security, which is the reason I will be there all three days in order to deal with nut cases if the need arises.

 

[Shaun from Scotland]

Re: Is this true, or another liar??

Randi`s page:



The Foundation is committed to providing reliable information about paranormal claims. It both supports and conducts original research into such claims.

My page:


STFU

 

[CSSMariner]

Is what true?

My post, or the quote about the JREF? I was sparring with no sweat with Swett. He split.

I will be there all three days, and watching for the Swett geek. I know you from the Emails you send in to the Radio Show, I'm Ken, sometimes "The Arm," and sometimes at the forum table when one of the prime movers is missing.

 

[Guest]

RANDI'S BODYGUARD

I ran into Senor Carlos_Swett in the Chat Room this week, and he claimed he was coming to the Amazing Meeting. With such nuts around we may have to look into beefing up security, which is the reason I will be there all three days in order to deal with nut cases if the need arises.

Hi CSS Mariner :

Asking for help?
Are you also afraid of me?
are you Randi's bodyguard ?
Are you a wrestler of WWA?
Are you a mafia's member?
Does the CSS in your nick stands for Carlos Swett Salas (CSS) ?
Do you have a brain or are you just a "gorilla"? Sorry for the reals gorillas.

I am still waiting .I am not afraid: losers.

Thanks,
S&S

 

[CWL]

Re: RANDI'S BODYGUARD

Hi CSS Mariner :

Asking for help?
Are you also afraid of me?
are you Randi's bodyguard ?
Are you a wrestler of WWA?
Are you a mafia's member?
Does the CSS in your nick stands for Carlos Swett Salas (CSS) ?
Do you have a brain or are you just a "gorilla"? Sorry for the reals gorillas.

I am still waiting .I am not afraid: losers.

Thanks,
S&S

No, no, no! Not "Thanks"! You're doing it all wrong. You are getting the "haiku style" right, but you should always end with "Thank you". Otherwise you are doing fine I would say.