I don't look at links that demand me to accept a Pop up...
I don't look at links that demand me to accept a Pop up...![]()
The Bible does, I was making a refrence to Revelation.
I don't look at links that demand me to accept a Pop up...![]()
I may be a little out of step at this point, so forgive the question: Are you saying that we should expect 2/3 of the world's population to die by January 2013?
No... using that and science the closest time line would be...2029-2035.


No... using that and science the closest time line would be...2029-2035.
The Pictures are amazing!
Science, where???
Using a word doesn't mean you did science.
Paul
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, very pretty. Isn't nature amazing?
Post more if you have them!
You have no idea what I study, so stop making presumptions.
Off the top of your head I will give you two minutes what moon has a surface texture like pudding?
Lets see how much studying you do.
Pretty simple you should get this.
More than a minute means you cheated...
10:53 here
You have no idea what I study, so stop making presumptions.
Off the top of your head I will give you two minutes what moon has a surface texture like pudding?
Lets see how much studying you do.
Pretty simple you should get this.
More than a minute means you cheated...
10:53 here
It is not a presumption. It doesn't make a difference what you are studying - if you are claiming that 2/3 of the world's population will die 20-ish years from now, you are not practicing science at all. Not even a little bit.
Another non sequitur. So was this another joke or did you really think this was relevant in any way?
All we have to do is go by your post, and you show nothing that anyone would call science.
Paul
![]()
![]()
Now, how many ergs of energy does a body weighting 10 kilogram going at 50% of the speed of light have.
It is not a presumption. It doesn't make a difference what you are studying - if you are claiming that 2/3 of the world's population will die 20-ish years from now, you are not practicing science at all. Not even a little bit.
Another non sequitur. So was this another joke or did you really think this was relevant in any way?
Much as with Venus prior to the Space Age, the dense, opaque atmosphere prevented understanding of Titan's surface until new information accumulated with the arrival of the Cassini–Huygens mission in 2004, including the discovery of liquid hydrocarbon lakes in the satellite's polar regions. These are the only large, stable bodies of surface liquid known to exist anywhere other than Earth. The surface is geologically young; although mountains and several possible cryovolcanoes have been
It was a moon around Saturn.
Titan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(moon)
I came up with a good joke but I thought better of it.![]()
So it was a non sequitur. Knowing a few or even a lot of facts about astronomy does not make one knowledgeable about how and when to apply the scientific method.