The Bible is a Human Artifice!!!

[Leumas]

The evidence for Loki is lacking and it's irrational to believe in him based on the information available.

That does not prove the Loki does not exist. He could just be having a laugh with the elf stealing my socks in the laundry room.

Yes... so you are admitting that all you are doing is derailing this thread... thanks for admitting it.

 

[Steve]

You are the one who made a claim that there are magic elves who stole your sock and want me to prove that they did not...
If you do not believe magic elves exist then you have proven your claim to be false by your own belief.

And if you believe they did then you need to prove it ... not I disprove it.

And that Shifting Of the Burden Of Proof illogic is a fallacious illogic.

And of course ... that is on top of the Unfalsifiability Fallacy to boot...

Your entire argument is arrant illogic.

And you know that... but you are doing it anyway because you are doing what that guy admitted you are all doing... if you are not then refute him.... that you have not done so so far is testimonial of you agreement with him.

Since you are so big on logic - There is no evidence that Craig4 wants you to prove anything. He merely asked if you could. Maybe stop twisting the words of other posters and applying motives not in evidence.

 

[Leumas]

(Sigh) No. I have been taking this entirely seriously.

So tell that guy that he has misrepresented you and was lying about your intentions... tell him that... not me... if you do not the that means you agree with him.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

So tell that guy that he has misrepresented you and was lying about your intentions... tell him that... not me... if you do not the that means you agree with him.

Your attempt at logic, as usual, is terrible.

 

[Leumas]

Your attempt at logic, as usual, is terrible.

Only because you have no idea what it is.... as proven by you claiming that an omnipotent deity wrote the fictive work called the Bible and you shift the burden of proof to disproving it.... fallacious illogic... and that is on top of the unfalsifiability of your statement in the first place... which is yet another fallacious illogic....


If you cannot see how irrational your argument is then no wonder you think FACTUAL LOGIC is a failure.

But... so far I have not seen you refuting the egregious misrepresentation that guy did on your and the "us" behalf with what he said....

Unless of course you admit that he was right ... which proves that all this incessant and indefatigable relentless deployment of illogical fallacies... is just a ruse to derail the thread and do what that guy admitted you are all doing.

Refute that guy and tell him off for misrepresenting you... or you are agreeing that he told the truth about what you all ... the "us" are doing....

 

[Craig4]

Yes... so you are admitting that all you are doing is derailing this thread... thanks for admitting it.

You don't perhaps see any parallels between your claim about the bible and the elf in my laundry room?

 

[Leumas]

Since you are so big on logic - There is no evidence that Craig4 wants you to prove anything. He merely asked if you could. Maybe stop twisting the words of other posters and applying motives not in evidence.

Thanks for yet another demonstration proving that what that guy admitted you are doing is true and that you are in agreement with him...

Thanks for admitting your relentless derailment of this thread.... because all it proves is the extent of problems the OP pauses... so QED!!!

Thanks for admitting it.!!

 

[Leumas]

You don't perhaps see any parallels between your claim about the bible and the elf in my laundry room?

No... because I can utilize correct logic not fallacious irrationality that you are doing... or else you are doing what that guy admitted you are all doing which is to derail this thread... and you are admitting it every post you make that is not directed at that guy telling him off for misrepresenting you, which means he is definitely representing you... thanks for admitting it...

All I can conclude is that all that tsunami of "us" doing every thing possible in their powers to derail and ridicule the OP is because of not wanting to admit the facts of it... so QED!!!

Thanks for admitting your derailment uses.

 

[Craig4]

No... (flawed, twisted logic and willful ignorance snipped).

That is why you fail.


For best results, read the above in Yoda's voice. It's really more impactful that way.

 

[Steve]

Thanks for yet another demonstration proving that what that guy admitted you are doing is true and that you are in agreement with him...

Thanks for admitting your relentless derailment of this thread.... because all it proves is the extent of problems the OP pauses... so QED!!!

Thanks for admitting it.!!

Perhaps I should be making allowance for the fact that English is not your first language? You certainly seem to be having problems with definitions and/or context of English words. Go to your reference material and look up the meaning of admitted, admitting, and pauses. If I am wrong about this, the alternative is that you could just stop lying.

 

[Leumas]

That is why you fail. <snip derailing of the thread>

<snip derailing of the thread>

Every single post you make without having refuted the claim that all you are doing is derailing this thread.... is admitting that you are derailing this thread...

So anything you say is nothing but disingenuous pretenses and dissimulations in order to do what you are admitting that you are doing... namely ... derailing this thread....

And the motivation for this can only ... a testament to the effect of the OP... so ... QED!!!



And every single post you do is further ... proof of the effect of the OP... so I really appreciate you and the "us" letting me know that you find the OP so troubling that you all had to "us" together to derail this thread which is what that guy freely admitted you are doing.

QED!!!

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Only because you have no idea what it is.... as proven by you claiming that an omnipotent deity wrote the fictive work called the Bible and you shift the burden of proof to disproving it.... fallacious illogic... and that is on top of the unfalsifiability of your statement in the first place... which is yet another fallacious illogic....


If you cannot see how irrational your argument is then no wonder you think FACTUAL LOGIC is a failure.

But... so far I have not seen you refuting the egregious misrepresentation that guy did on your and the "us" behalf with what he said....

Unless of course you admit that he was right ... which proves that all this incessant and indefatigable relentless deployment of illogical fallacies... is just a ruse to derail the thread and do what that guy admitted you are all doing.

Refute that guy and tell him off for misrepresenting you... or you are agreeing that he told the truth about what you all ... the "us" are doing....

Hopeless.

I did not claim a God wrote the bible; I pointed out that you had failed to prove that could not have happened. Your attention to detail is woeful.

I have already told you I am treating this thread seriously. I'm not responsible for whatever anyone else posts so stop demanding I do stuff about it.

 

[junkshop]

Leumas; fellow member of this forum, and my brother in atheism,

Let us consider your OP for a moment:

Another proof of the bible being an artifice of human making is the fact that it was written in the language of the Canaanites, a people the deity of the bible execrated and tried to extirpate but failed because they had iron chariots.

And it was scripted using the flowed and incomplete Abjad of the Arameans, yet another peoples the deity of the bible execrated.

And it was allegedly given to an Egyptian courtier descended from Sumerians to give to runaway slaves descended from 70 Sumerian men with their mothers and sister after having been slaves in Egypt for 430 years


QED!!!

Now let us discuss it.

Another proof of the bible being an artifice of human making...

This opening implies that this is a continuation of, or addendum to, a prior thread where you have proved that the bible is 'an artifice of human making'. Yet it is not.

In addition, you are using a non-standard definition of 'the bible' (although at this point no-one else is aware of this) I may return to this point later.

...it was written in the language of the Canaanites, a people the deity of the bible execrated and tried to extirpate...

There has been considerable back and forth regarding whether the Hebrews and the Canaanites spoke and/or wrote in different languages, the same language, or related yet distinct dialects of the same language...

This is irrelevant. You cannot show me the original manuscript of the bible. You cannot show me what language it was written in, and with which script. Your claim is unsupported, and thus it proves nothing about who did or didn't write the bible.

...it was allegedly given to an Egyptian courtier descended from Sumerians to give to runaway slaves descended from 70 Sumerian men with their mothers and sister after having been slaves in Egypt for 430 years...

This is just a (somewhat inaccurate*) summary of the narrative of part of one of the books that makes up what is commonly called the bible. It does nothing to prove anything about who did or didn't author any of it.

...QED!!!

Nisi quod probatum est!!!


_{*as has been previously mentioned, you would appear to have conflated 'Ur', and 'Ur of the Chaldees'. Understandable, but a mistake, nonetheless.}

 

[Craig4]

Every single post you make without having refuted the claim that all you are doing is derailing this thread.... is admitting that you are derailing this thread...

So anything you say is nothing but disingenuous pretenses and dissimulations in order to do what you are admitting that you are doing... namely ... derailing this thread....

And the motivation for this can only ... a testament to the effect of the OP... so ... QED!!!



And every single post you do is further ... proof of the effect of the OP... so I really appreciate you and the "us" letting me know that you find the OP so troubling that you all had to "us" together to derail this thread which is what that guy freely admitted you are doing.

QED!!!

If everyone is derailing the thread, it's probably a problem with your premise. If the whole world is out to get you, it's probably onto something.

 

[Thermal]

Leumas; fellow member of this forum, and my brother in atheism,

Let us consider your OP for a moment:

Where did you find that post? I hadn't seen it before.

 

[junkshop]

Where did you find that post? I hadn't seen it before.

It has ever been there, for those that have eyes to see....

 

[Steve]

Where did you find that post? I hadn't seen it before.

What! You mean the post that contains zero evidence, never mind actual proof, that the bible is a human artifice (!!!)? The post that contains nothing but speculation? The post that started this very thread? That post? Seems the author of that post would like for it to not exist.


There is very likely much truth in the title of the thread. It is rather unfortunate the OP could not have just left it at that.

 

[junkshop]

Apropos of nothing, "bafflegab" is a fun word.

I've no idea why that thought bubbled up in my brain, I'm sure.

So it goes.

 

[jrhowell]

Thread recap:

Leumas: Here is my proof that the Bible could not possibly have been written by God: ...

Everyone Else: That proof does not make logical sense.

Leumas: If you disagree with my proof you must be a Bible toting God botherer.

Everyone Else: Huh? What?

 

[Craig4]

Thread recap:

Leumas: Here is my proof that the Bible could not possibly have been written by God: ...

Everyone Else: That proof does not make logical sense.

Leumas: If you disagree with my proof you must be a Bible toting God botherer.

Everyone Else: Huh? What?

You're supposed to add a QED at the end. That does...something.