Cont: The behaviour of US police officers - part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
It surprises me that the cops still seem unaware that lots of people carry video cameras with a direct link to the internet these days.

They still seem to think they can make stuff up when they know it will be filmed and that people will swallow it.

It's not that, it's more to do with the fact that they are, whether we like it or not, unassailable and don't give a **** who see's what. Their backs are covered.
 
It's not that, it's more to do with the fact that they are, whether we like it or not, unassailable and don't give a **** who see's what. Their backs are covered.

And the worst part is that we are the ones covering their backs, each time a different shiny tweet distracts us. Just wait it out and it blows over. Which is why it's so important to back the protesters and upset the table once in a while.
 
Or they don't care. The Chauvin conviction was an exception to the normal course of events. Cops not even being charged, much less convicted. No matter how stark or compelling the evidence against them may be.

It's probably worth pointing out again that the only reason Chauvin's crime wasn't swept under the rug is because of the massive media coverage and mass protests.
 
Twitter thread links are weird. It should be the last video in the thread that corresponds with the PPB version of events.



https://twitter.com/gravemorgan/status/1408313568299130880

The video shows a protestor approach the riot line and yell at a cop and point their finger. The cops apparently doesn't like being talked to this way, takes a couple swats at the person's pointed finger, then starts charging with his nightstick. All the fellow riot cops charge in and start spraying pepperspray everywhere. If any cop was sprayed, it was friendly fire.

The video is unambiguous in showing that the cops initiated the violence, but you wouldn't get that impression from how the police describe events.

Is it not this video?

https://twitter.com/running_50/status/1408299689783435264
 
So it seems some US police are trying to enlist YouTube to stop their misconduct being made public:

US officer plays Taylor Swift song to try to stop video

Last year, Nick Simmons and Adam Holland of Harvard University's Lumen project, which studies copyright content removal, noted that a number of videos linked to Black Lives Matter protests had been removed because they contained copyrighted music.

The researchers suggested that "law enforcement", or anyone else who wanted to stop videos being shared, "need only make sure that copyrighted audio is present with sufficiently recognisable clarity and volume in the background of a protest or other event".

The pair called it: "A chilling prospect indeed."
 
Ohio police chief forced to resign over KKK "prank" on black officer

Anthony Campo, the chief of police for the city of Sheffield Lake, Ohio, was effectively fired by the mayor after a complaint by the police union on behalf of the black officer who was targeted by the "joke", who is not named in any the reports.

Security video shows Campo printing out the sign in his office, and then bringing it out to the black officer's desk while that officer is out of the room. Campo takes the officer's yellow rain slicker which is laying folded on the desk, and carefully arranges the slicker's hood to be pointed - like a Klan hood - before covering up the POLICE label on the slicker with his printed sign, which read "Ku Klux Klan". He then goes back into the office. The video does not appear to show anybody witnessing Campo's actions directly. The black officer is seen soon afterwards returning to his desk and noticing the sign. There is no audio, but the officer seems to be immediately asking who was responsible as everyone appears to deny knowledge, including Campo.

According to the mayor, Campo was indignant at being dismissed (he was allowed to retire on the spot rather than be fired) and has insisted to news reporters that it was "just a joke" and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal.
 
Last edited:
Ohio police chief forced to resign over KKK "prank" on black officer

Anthony Campo, the chief of police for the city of Sheffield Lake, Ohio, was effectively fired by the mayor after a complaint by the police union on behalf of the black officer who was targeted by the "joke", who is not named in any the reports.

Security video shows Campo printing out the sign in his office, and then bringing it out to the black officer's desk while that officer is out of the room. Campo takes the officer's yellow rain slicker which is laying folded on the desk, and carefully arranges the slicker's hood to be pointed - like a Klan hood - before covering up the POLICE label on the slicker with his printed sign, which read "Ku Klux Klan". He then goes back into the office. The video does not appear to show anybody witnessing Campo's actions directly. The black officer is seen soon afterwards returning to his desk and noticing the sign. There is no audio, but the officer seems to be immediately asking who was responsible as everyone appears to deny knowledge, including Campo.

According to the mayor, Campo was indignant at being dismissed (he was allowed to retire on the spot rather than be fired) and has insisted to news reporters that it was "just a joke" and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal.

I came here to post that.

Because obviously it's just harmless banter for the boss to do that to a subordinate.
 
I came here to post that.

Because obviously it's just harmless banter for the boss to do that to a subordinate.

What really cements it as a classic goof is denying it when the...fun recipient...asks who did it.
 
I came here to post that.

Because obviously it's just harmless banter for the boss to do that to a subordinate.

What really cements it as a classic goof is denying it when the...fun recipient...asks who did it.

I've heard OF this kind of situation before a couple of times, where black police officers are seemingly subjected to racist "jokes" and statements from white officers. It's almost as if white cops who are racist have a perception or expectation that black colleagues, by virtue of being cops themselves and occasionally interacting with black suspects, must "get it" (i.e., understand the "truth" about black people) and ought to have no problem with casual racism.

But I can't say I know how prevalent this sort of thing is. It's not uncommon to hear about white cops being dismissed for racist actions and statements but those actions usually aren't directed toward black colleagues.
 
Speaking of termination, the cop that killed Hunter Brittain has been fired. Apparently he didn't activate his body cam until after the shooting, which is a bit of a no-no.

So far no charges, though.
 
Speaking of termination, the cop that killed Hunter Brittain has been fired. Apparently he didn't activate his body cam until after the shooting, which is a bit of a no-no.

So far no charges, though.

Don't worry. He'll find a job in the next precinct over.
 
What the cops say happened:

A crowd has formed at the officer involved shooting scene. Some participants have thrown objects and tried to enter the closed area. An officer’s baton was grabbed by someone and when another officer intervened, the officer was sprayed with a chemical.

https://twitter.com/PortlandPolice/status/1408303481962655744

Video of what actually happened.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1408313568299130880

Technically, the police version is true. A crowd had formed. Some participants did throw objects (after the police started advancing). An Officer's baton was grabbed by someone (the Officer), the Officer was sprayed with a chemical (by another officer). It is only the impression that they wish to leave that is false. The individual sentences are quite true.
 
Technically, the police version is true. A crowd had formed. Some participants did throw objects (after the police started advancing). An Officer's baton was grabbed by someone (the Officer), the Officer was sprayed with a chemical (by another officer). It is only the impression that they wish to leave that is false. The individual sentences are quite true.

In this Tweet: https://twitter.com/gravemorgan/status/1408313568299130880?s=20 the police officer assaults a member of the public who at the worst could have been haranguing a police officer and then the police act like a mob.

Who on earth has trained these police?
 
In this Tweet: https://twitter.com/gravemorgan/status/1408313568299130880?s=20 the police officer assaults a member of the public who at the worst could have been haranguing a police officer and then the police act like a mob.

Who on earth has trained these police?

In some cases, the IDF, which are probably among the world's most effective abusers of human rights and masters of using brutality to pacify social unrest.

https://www.amnestyusa.org/with-whom-are-many-u-s-police-departments-training-with-a-chronic-human-rights-violator-israel/
 
Last edited:
In this Tweet: https://twitter.com/gravemorgan/status/1408313568299130880?s=20 the police officer assaults a member of the public who at the worst could have been haranguing a police officer and then the police act like a mob.

Who on earth has trained these police?

Other police.

Americans. They are trained exactly the way the majority of Americans want them to be trained. To use violence as the prime means of dealing with a problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom