The All Purpose Hillary Clinton Thread

Black voters are turning from Clinton to Trump in new poll

Donald Trump is gaining support among African-American voters — whose enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton is eroding, a tracking poll released Saturday revealed.

Trump saw a 16.5 percentage-point increase in backing from African-American voters in a Los Angeles Times/University of Southern California tracking poll.

Meanwhile, the same poll showed Clinton’s support among that group plummeting from 90.4 percent on Sept. 10 to 71.4 percent.

Clinton’s nearly 20-point crash began Sunday, the day Clinton was recorded collapsing while entering a Secret Service van at a 9/11 event.

Read more:
http://nypost.com/2016/09/18/black-voters-are-turning-from-clinton-to-trump-in-new-poll/ (September 18, 2016)


Looks like it time to throw in the towel (or a diaper in Hillary's case), she's done.

Trump was right, Crooked Hillary is just another choke artist.
 

Attachments

  • Hillary10.jpg
    Hillary10.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Well, you are not alone Mr. Powell, "I would rather not vote for her" either; and definitely won't.
Has Powell said he won't be voting for Clinton?

I note you omit any mention of his comments on Trump.

Meanwhile, Crooked Hillary can't even handle the rigors of campaigning without collapsing -- she's a physical train wreck.
Lie.

And her unscrupulous, reprobate husband is still dropping his trousers every time a "bimbo" gets within a 10-foot range, as Powell tells it.
Evidence?

In other news, Crooked Hillary has requested that the upcoming debates be informal with the candidates sitting down -- she can't even stand up for an hour without collapsing.
Citation?
 
Looks like it time to throw in the towel (or a diaper in Hillary's case), she's done.

Trump was right, Crooked Hillary is just another choke artist.
I see you're still using cartoons from Garrison. Will you be
quoting his anti-GMO, anti-Federal Reserce, anti-vaccination, anti-fluoridation nonsense too?
 
Hillary Clinton, who tells dreadful lies

A recent NBC News poll found that just 11 percent of Americans say Clinton is honest and trustworthy. To put that in perspective, 14 percent of American voters believe in Bigfoot. In other words, more Americans believe that a large, hairy, hominoid creature inhabits the forest of North America than believe that Hillary Clinton tells the truth.

So if Clinton wonders why so many believe she is lying about her health, it is because she has lied so many times, about so many things, that most Americans no longer believe a word she says — even if she’s telling the truth.

Read more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...c4905bf40dc_story.html?utm_term=.5554e6109498 (September 19, 2016)


Only 11 percent of Americans believe Crooked Hillary?

Yeah, that sounds about right. And many of them frequent this forum.
 

Attachments

  • hillary13.jpg
    hillary13.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 5
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove reference to moderated content in another thread and Forum Management issues


I had said [snip] that Hillary could start WW3.

Here is some-one who put it succinctly

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/rfk-trump-2016-democratic-party-speechwriter-214270

...But today’s Democrats have become the Party of War: a home for arms merchants, mercenaries, academic war planners, lobbyists for every foreign intervention, promoters of color revolutions, failed generals, exploiters of the natural resources of corrupt governments.

...We have American military bases in 80 countries, and there are now American military personnel on the ground in about 130 countries, a remarkable achievement since there are only 192 recognized countries. Generals and admirals announce our national policies. Theater commanders are our principal ambassadors. Our first answer to trouble or opposition of any kind seems always to be a military movement or action.

...Nor has the Democratic Party candidate for president this year, Hillary Clinton, sought peace. Instead she has pushed America into successive invasions, successive efforts at “regime change.”

...She has sought to prevent Americans from seeking friendship or cooperation with President Vladimir Putin of Russia by characterizing him as “another Hitler.” She proclaims herself ready to invade Syria immediately after taking the oath of office.

...Her shadow War Cabinet brims with the architects of war and disaster for the past decades, the neocons who led us to our present pass, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen, in Ukraine, unrepentant of all past errors, ready to resume it all with fresh trillions and fresh blood.

...And the Democrats she leads seem intent on worsening relations with Russia, for example by sending American warships into the Black Sea, or by introducing nuclear weapons ever closer to Russia itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove reference to moderated content in another thread and Forum Management issues


I had said [snip] that Hillary could start WW3.

Here is some-one who put it succinctly

Yeah, Walinsky's turning eighty next year. For a younger point of view, let's try Peter Edelman who worked with Walinsky.

Robert Kennedy Would Have Hated Donald Trump
The GOP candidate is not the man of peace my former colleague makes him out to be.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...onald-trump-party-of-war-214274#ixzz4LBKEsCWY
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

His point is that anyone's entitle to their criticism and Walinsky's seems to be that the entire Democratic Party has become the party of war. If he was a little clearer that it has become a party of war, it might be a more sane position, but when you have two candidates, one being Trump, it's pretty hard to consider the one that's NOT TRUMP to be the party of war.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In early statements regarding the recent NY bombing Hillary and Donald both say the word 'bomb'

Then the media edits out her saying 'bomb'.

Then the media airs her criticizing Trump for using the word bomb too soon.

Why trust the same media for subsequent coverage of the candidates?
 
In early statements regarding the recent NY bombing Hillary and Donald both say the word 'bomb'

Then the media edits out her saying 'bomb'.

Then the media airs her criticizing Trump for using the word bomb too soon.

Why trust the same media for subsequent coverage of the candidates?

This is not true. Don't you realize that you are posting to people who watched the events unfold and who heard the two statements? Don't you realize that there's video available - with no editing out of "bombings" of Hillary's earliest statement?

Here - in the very first line.... "...bombings...". There's a full thread on this in SI/CE. By the time Hillary spoke, it was confirmed that it was a bomb.

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/polit...x-sot.cnn/video/playlists/new-york-explosion/

Where's the editing? Please try to limit your conspiracy theories to the appropriate sub-forums.
 
I suppose it comes as no surprise that the same people in this forum who would blame Clinton for the entire Middle East war zone are also the ones claiming Bush was not responsible for anything, it was multiple other factors.
 
Gennifer Flowers ‘agrees’ to sit front row at first debate

“Ms. Flowers has agreed to join Donald at the debate,” her personal assistant, Judy Stell, wrote in an e-mail to BuzzFeed, according to the Web site.

“If dopey Mark Cuban of failed Benefactor fame wants to sit in the front row, perhaps I will put Gennifer Flowers right alongside of him!” Trump tweeted.

It was a shot at Clinton’s decision to seat Mark Cuban, a frequent Trump critic, in the front row as her debate guest.

Read more:
http://nypost.com/2016/09/24/gennifer-flowers-will-be-sitting-front-row-at-first-debate/ (September 24, 2016)


Other potential guests include: Monica Lewinski, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Julie Tauber McMahon ("The Energizer"), just to name a few.

If all of Bill's "bimbos" show up en masse, their gonna need a much bigger stadium.
 
An anti-Trump person sent me this in an email about Presidents from JFK to present... These are the parts relevant to this thread.

Secrets of the Secret Service

Interesting snippets from Ronald Kessler's book about our presidents.

BILL & HILLARY CLINTON
Presidency was one giant party. Not trustworthy. He was nice mainly because he wanted everyone to like him but to him life is just one big game and party. Everyone knows about his sexuality.

She is another phony. Her personality would change the instant cameras were near. She hated, with open disdain the military and Secret Service. She was another who felt people were there to serve her. She was always trying to keep tabs on Bill Clinton.

BARACK & MICHELLE OBAMA
Clinton all over again - hates the military and looks down on the Secret Service. He is egotistical and cunning. He looks you in the eye and appears to agree with you but turns around and does the opposite. He has horrible temper tantrums which include childlike throwing of things and breaking things.

She is a complete bitch who basically hates anybody who is not black, hates the military and looks at the Secret Service as her personal servants. They are two of the phoniest people ever to set foot in the white house.

… he handed Obama his resignation. Not satisfied with accepting McChrystal's resignation, the President made a cheap parting shot:
"I bet when I die you'll be happy to piss on my grave."
The General saluted and said, "Mr. President, I always told myself after leaving the Army I'd never stand in line again."
 
Last edited:
Ah, more unsupported accusations - what a shock :jaw-dropp

Actually, the 2nd hand information I had was that the Secret Service loved Bill Clinton. He actually spent a lot of time hanging out with them during Lewinsky affair because she had kicked him out of the bedroom. And apparently they had a running card game on Marine 1, so every time they got on, they sat and played cards.
 
An anti-Trump person sent me this in an email about Presidents from JFK to present... These are the parts relevant to this thread.

A nutter email? You just offer it up without checking on it? A ten year old could probably debunk that nonsense. (The supposed author is a notorious liar. and he's not even the source for some of it.)


Tell us the one about the Marine and the Atheist college professor next. Then can we do "Colgate is secretly Satanist".
 

Back
Top Bottom